Re: would like review of my polipo-tor packaging

2011-01-18 Thread travis+ml-debian-mentors
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 11:20:29PM -0500, Scott Howard wrote: Hello- non-DD review. I haven't built it yet but there are some quick cosmetic things to do first: Thanks so much for the feedback! I'll look into doing these next time I get some spare brain cycles. Standards-Version: 3.8.4

Re: would like review of my polipo-tor packaging

2011-01-18 Thread Scott Howard
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 3:12 PM, travis+ml-debian-ment...@subspacefield.org wrote: Standards-Version: 3.8.4 should be 3.9.1 I used the dh tools to make this, and I've seen debuild complain about this, but really didn't know what I should be doing in this case - funny thing is, both tools were

Re: would like review of my polipo-tor packaging

2011-01-18 Thread Scott Howard
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 4:34 PM, Scott Howard showard...@gmail.com wrote: TOR not having their act together - does that mean that they haven't released a stable version yet or that no stable package is in Debian? Would you be interested in packaging and maintaining TOR in Debian? Sorry, just

Re: would like review of my polipo-tor packaging

2011-01-17 Thread travis+ml-debian-mentors
Hey all, http://www.subspacefield.org/packages/ubuntu/ I've made that polipo-tor package available in the above repo. I tried to reach the Ubuntu packagers who made the ubuntu package, but was told to ask here. I haven't received any feedback since posting here on the package itself, and am

Re: would like review of my polipo-tor packaging

2011-01-17 Thread travis+ml-debian-mentors
http://mentors.debian.net/cgi-bin/maintainer-packages?action=details;package=polipo-tor;seeksponsor=0 Not asking for a sponsor right now since it depends on pkgs not in deb/ubu repos. But would like constructive criticism on packaging. Version upped to 1.4 with various minor packaging fixes.

Re: would like review of my polipo-tor packaging

2011-01-17 Thread Scott Howard
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 6:42 PM, travis+ml-debian-ment...@subspacefield.org wrote: http://mentors.debian.net/cgi-bin/maintainer-packages?action=details;package=polipo-tor;seeksponsor=0 Not asking for a sponsor right now since it depends on pkgs not in deb/ubu repos. But would like

Re: would like review of my polipo-tor packaging

2011-01-08 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
On Fri, Jan 07, 2011 at 03:37:24PM -0800, tra...@subspacefield.org wrote: My emails do not have attachments; it's a digital signature that your mail program doesn't understand. | http://www.subspacefield.org/~travis/ Unfortunately not only is this false, you have also only attached the binary

would like review of my polipo-tor packaging

2011-01-07 Thread travis
polipo-tor-1.3 is attached. Ideally, using tor should be as simple as setting up repos, apt-get installing this package, and then boom, you got polipo, tor, and a polipo on TCP/8118 that forwards to tor. Then all you need is to install firefox torbutton and you're ready to rock. Copied a few