Hi,
I've run into a technical issue with packaging CCL, which I describe
below. I don't know whether debian-mentors or debian-devel is a more
appropriate forum to post this - please advise if mentors is
inappropriate.
CCL was once in Debian, but under a different name, namely openmcl. I
Hello List:
I am package a library from scratch.
The upstream source package contains no changelog file,
but the library website provides matter to extract one for it.
I guess that I may have to extract the changelog file from the website:
may I forget it ?
is there any tool to do so ?
Any
Quoting Jerome BENOIT (2012-07-17 10:11:16)
Hello List:
Hi,
I am package a library from scratch.
The upstream source package contains no changelog file,
but the library website provides matter to extract one for it.
I guess that I may have to extract the changelog file from the website:
Hi !
On 17/07/12 10:24, Simon Chopin wrote:
Quoting Jerome BENOIT (2012-07-17 10:11:16)
Hello List:
Hi,
I am package a library from scratch.
The upstream source package contains no changelog file,
but the library website provides matter to extract one for it.
I guess that I may have to
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 10:24:07AM +0200, Simon Chopin wrote:
Quoting Jerome BENOIT (2012-07-17 10:11:16)
The upstream source package contains no changelog file,
but the library website provides matter to extract one for it.
I guess that I may have to extract the changelog file from the
Hi all!
I have made a few days ago a RFS. I'm wondering would will be the right
behavior to refresh my RFS petition looking for an sponsor.
I think that the better way is to reply to the same RFS, updating the
state of the package (if it has changed) and mentioning that I don't
have still an
On 2012-07-17 11:38:32 +0530 (+0530), Faheem Mitha wrote:
[...]
CCL requires itself to build. Since it is not currently in the
Debian archive, that raises the question of how this should
happen.
[...]
Having not done this myself, I've seen it discussed ad nauseum on
debian-devel over the
On 17/07/12 13:28, The Fungi wrote:
On 2012-07-17 11:38:32 +0530 (+0530), Faheem Mitha wrote:
[...]
CCL requires itself to build. Since it is not currently in the
Debian archive, that raises the question of how this should
happen.
[...]
I'm not sure how much closer that's gotten to being
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 11:44:52AM +0200, José Luis Segura Lucas wrote:
Hi all!
I have made a few days ago a RFS. I'm wondering would will be the right
behavior to refresh my RFS petition looking for an sponsor.
I think that the better way is to reply to the same RFS, updating the
state
Hello Andreas,
On 16/07/12 16:15, Andreas Tille wrote:
Could you try to implement this to enable me building with
git-buildpackage easily?
git-buildpackage should be fixed now, but I didn't import the pristine
tar, since it is exactly the same as tag v0.9.1 in master.
Is the branch
Daniele E. Domenichelli daniele.domeniche...@gmail.com writes:
Hello Andreas,
On 16/07/12 16:15, Andreas Tille wrote:
Could you try to implement this to enable me building with
git-buildpackage easily?
git-buildpackage should be fixed now, but I didn't import the pristine
tar, since it is
On 17/07/12 16:20, Gergely Nagy wrote:
The difference between pristine-tar and a tag is that pristine-tar is
the tarball, gzipped and all that. If you want to recreate the *exact*
same thing from a tag, that is considerably harder, as you need to have
just the right timestamps and various other
On 17/07/12 16:50, Daniele E. Domenichelli wrote:
Anyway I just realized that I made some mess, with the original tarball
and the tarball created by git-buildpackage...
I'll try to fix it...
Ok, it should be fixed now.
But I left the debian branch so now there are 4 branches:
- master
Hi all
Yesterday Bart Martens filed a 'serious' bug against the package kstars-data-
extra-tycho2 that I maintain. The seriousness of the bug was related to the
possibility of copyright infringement.
I've cleared the doubt with a change to the Copyright file that now explicites
the terms under
On 11/07/12 14:45, Andrew Miller wrote:
Package: sponsorship-requests
CC: debian-scie...@lists.debian.org
CC: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
The CellML API (upstream website: http://cellml-api.sf.net/) is an
application programming interface, along with a complete reference
implementation,
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package boogiewoogie
* Package name: boogiewoogie
Version : 0.9-1
Upstream Author : Joerg Richter deb...@fuyosoft.com
* URL :
I am looking for a sponsor for a new version of Jampal. The previous
sponsor of Jampal was Kilian Krause
* Package name: jampal
Version : 02.01.06+dfsg1-1
Upstream Author : Peter Bennett pgbenn...@comcast.net
* URL : http://jampal.sf.net
* License :
Hello Nikolai,
The package at mentors is no longer there. What happened ?
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
block 681728 by 681933
Bug #681728 [wnpp] ITP: boogiewoogie -- Reads and stores graphics from iMPROV's
Boogie Board
681728 was not blocked by any bugs.
681728 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 681728: 681933
stop
Stopping
Your message dated Wed, 18 Jul 2012 04:29:21 +
with message-id e1srlt3-0003da...@quantz.debian.org
and subject line closing RFS: liblastfm/0.4.0~git20090710-2 [RC]
has caused the Debian Bug report #680141,
regarding RFS: liblastfm/0.4.0~git20090710-2 [RC]
to be marked as done.
This means that
20 matches
Mail list logo
