On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 3:23 PM, Miguelangel Jose Freitas Loreto
miguelangel.frei...@gmail.com wrote:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/u/usepackage/usepackage_1.8-2.dsc
Switching to cdbs is not appropriate during the testing release freeze
and the other change isn't something the
On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 12:41 PM, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso
jord...@gmail.com wrote:
I think you missed my debhelper 7 comment?
I'm actually using version 7, since dh_prep needs it.
Ok.
There are no header files in the -dev package, does fortran not need
external headers to be able to link to
On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 6:20 PM, Rafael Laboissiere raf...@debian.org wrote:
Otherwise, the package builds and installs fine here. I would just follow
the suggestion from Paul Wise and put README and function-reference only in
the -dev package.
Well, this is a fortran library, you don't
On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 6:35 AM, Elías A. M. eal...@gmail.com wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.6.1-1
of my package jigzo.
Too late, Bart Martens already uploaded his version:
http://packages.qa.debian.org/j/jigzo/news/20090207T205024Z.html
The upload would fix these
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 4:04 AM, Antonio Radici anto...@dyne.org wrote:
as part of ITP #497701 I'm packaging libv8, a high-performance
java script library written by Google and used in Chrominum, the
open source version of the Chrome browser.
If you are also packaging Chromium, please note
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 4:11 AM, ERSEK Laszlo la...@elte.hu wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package lbzip2.
How is this different to or better than pbzip2?
Perhaps you could get the two upstreams to collaborate and merge the
two implementations of the same thing?
--
bye,
pabs
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 5:29 AM, Martin Meredith m...@debian.org wrote:
Hi there, I think that you should get the description proof read.
Please link to debian-l10n-english when giving such (good) advice:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-l10n-english/
Not everyone knows about every single one
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 11:51 AM, Érsek László la...@chello.hu wrote:
How is this different to or better than pbzip2?
As I've written in the hot spice paragraph of my RFS, lbzip2 can
decompress
- with multiple threads
pbzip2 too.
- a bz2 file consisting of a single bzip2 stream (eg.
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 9:59 PM, ERSEK Laszlo la...@elte.hu wrote:
I believe I wasn't exact enough. If your compressed input has *any* of the
following characterists, pbzip2 won't use multiple worker threads to
decompress it, while lbzip2 will:
(1) The compressed input is read from a pipe.
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 11:01 AM, ERSEK Laszlo la...@elte.hu wrote:
One such thing would be the set of paths I'd to put under an install:
rule. This has clearly no place in Makefile.dev which is my personal
playground, or Makefile.portable, which is what it is called. (The
default Makefile,
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 4:12 AM, ERSEK Laszlo la...@elte.hu wrote:
I uploaded a new build of the package:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/lbzip2
Apologies for the delay, uploaded, should end up in NEW soon.
Please contact this list for future versions and I will upload if I am
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 1:00 AM, ERSEK Laszlo la...@elte.hu wrote:
1. Can you please enlighten me how the amd64 package was built (maybe you
built it?)
I built it in a clean chroot using cowbuilder (there is also sbuild,
pdbuilder, lvmbuilder, qemubuilder).
Is it usual that amd64 packages
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 6:53 PM, Arne Wichmann ar...@rasentrimmer.org wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package spacehero.
...
It builds these binary packages:
spacehero - Space game to let you simulate Galaxies.
Do you plan to join the Debian Games Team and maintain this there? We
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 2:46 AM, Andrew Gee and...@andrewgee.org wrote:
* Package name: osm-gps-map
Version : 0.2-1
Upstream Author : John Stowers john.stow...@gmail.com
* URL : http://nzjrs.github.com/osm-gps-map/
You might want to get upstream to join
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 9:23 PM, Andrew Gee and...@webspot.co.uk wrote:
I understand that libchamplain doesn't have python bindings, and has a
dependency on clutter.
OK.
Would it still be able to package this for Debian?
I wasn't suggesting that you can't package it for Debian, just that
On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 2:11 AM, Sjors Gielen mailingl...@dazjorz.com wrote:
I'm working on a Debian port to Cygwin called Debian GNU/kCygwin.
Have you considered basing it on ReactOS (GPLed, binary-compatible
Windows clone) so that proprietary software isn't needed to run your
port?
--
bye,
On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 9:47 AM, Noel David Torres Taño
env...@rolamasao.org wrote:
Does somebody know if 3.0 (Quilt) format packages are actually accepted in
the archive? My mentor tried before Lenny frozen and the package get rejected
then.
They will be rejected until the ftp-masters have
On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 8:11 PM, Sjors Gielen mailingl...@dazjorz.com wrote:
If the binary compatibility is complete, Cygwin should run fine on ReactOS
and so will the port, right? :-)
Probably, will you include the ReactOS kernel then?
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To
On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 8:45 PM, Sjors Gielen mailingl...@dazjorz.com wrote:
As I understand it, ReactOS is an operating system you can run Cygwin on.
Why would I include the kernel? I'd say users of ReactOS can fetch Cygwin or
Debian-kCygwin in the same way as Win32 users would. Right?
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 9:16 PM, Jonathan Wiltshire
deb...@jwiltshire.org.uk wrote:
On Mon, Mar 02, 2009 at 11:41:04AM +0100, Thomas Koch wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2.7.0b-1+nmu
of my package yui.
Why the +nmu? If this is an NMU upload, it should be -1.1.
Also, you
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 12:50 AM, Francisco M. García Claramonte
fgclaramo...@yahoo.es wrote:
- dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/lynis/lynis_1.2.3-1.dsc
Upstream changed their copyright info (+2009), debian/copyright needs
to change too.
There is one pedantic lintian complaint:
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 8:04 PM, Francisco M. García Claramonte
fgclaramo...@yahoo.es wrote:
First of all Thanks for your revision.
I have fixed the points you tell me.
Uploaded to Debian, thanks for your contribution.
Please mail this list for future uploads and I'll sponsor it if I am able.
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 6:31 AM, mezgani ali hand...@gmail.com wrote:
greyfix - Greylisting policy daemon for Postfix.
We have several similar packages in Debian, could you explain why this
one should be added?
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 8:07 PM, Felix Zielcke fziel...@z-51.de wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package reiserfsprogs.
I'm now a DM so only a one time upload is needed.
You shouldn't add DM-Upload-Allowed to your packages, that is for
sponsors to do when they are comfortable with your
On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 9:36 AM, Daniel Moerner dmoer...@gmail.com wrote:
In general, it's pretty similar to a normal make setup. Instead of
calling $(MAKE), just define SCONS (e.g., SCONS = scons, at the top of
the file) and then call $(SCONS). The upstream SConstruct file should
support
On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 7:58 PM, Grammostola Rosea
rosea.grammost...@gmail.com wrote:
sudo apt-get install devscripts ; build-rdeps scons
Sorry, but how can I check it? Where can I find the rules files?
E. something like this should do it:
apt-get source foo
cd foo*/
less debian/rules
On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 11:22 PM, Chow Loong Jin hyper...@gmail.com wrote:
You'll have to ask the maintainer of the debs on that server. Or the
server admin.
While you are at it, please suggest to them that they should join
Debian and upload their packages here instead.
--
bye,
pabs
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 4:35 AM, Karl Ferdinand Ebert kfeb...@gmail.com wrote:
tmux - terminal multiplexer
This sounds very much like 'screen', what advantages does it have over 'screen'?
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 5:56 AM, Loïc Fejoz l...@fejoz.net wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package crrcsim.
* Package name : crrcsim
...
Section : contrib/games
It builds these binary packages:
crrcsim - Model-Airplane Flight Simulator
You might want to join the
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 5:56 AM, Loïc Fejoz l...@fejoz.net wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package crrcsim.
* Package name : crrcsim
...
Section : contrib/games
...
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/contrib/c/crrcsim/crrcsim_0.9.10-1.dsc
According to debian-policy,
On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 3:16 AM, M G Berberich
berbe...@fmi.uni-passau.de wrote:
Upstream Author : [fill in name and email of upstream]
* URL : [fill in URL of upstreams web site]
* License : [fill in]
Section : libs
Surely you could fill these in before sending
n Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 10:58 AM, Ben Finney ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au wrote:
The description for Lintian warning old-fsf-address-in-copyright-file
says:
The /usr/share/doc/pkg/copyright file refers to the old postal
address of the Free Software Foundation (FSF). The new address is:
2009/3/16 Jaromír Mikeš mira.mi...@seznam.cz:
I am running ubuntu based distro reportbug wnpp not working on it can I use
ubuntu-bug?
Or some other way?
You need a Debian sid install to build and test your packages in
before uploading them to Debian, so you could use that to report the
bug.
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 8:12 AM, ERSEK Laszlo la...@elte.hu wrote:
I released a new upstream version (0.14, changes should become shortly
visible under http://freshmeat.net/projects/lbzip2) and made available a new
build of the corresponding Debian package; the URL is the same as above.
...
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 5:55 AM, ERSEK Laszlo la...@elte.hu wrote:
Oops. The nocheck build option needed a change. I apologize for rushing it.
I uploaded the package to
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/lbzip2
Uploaded.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 10:40 PM, Anthony Gasperin
anthony.gaspe...@gmail.com wrote:
My problem is that I do not know how to process with library packaging,
I am wondering if somebody would know where I could find relative
documentation.
http://packages.debian.org/libpkg-guide
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 7:26 AM, Vincent MAUGE vma...@gmail.com wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package flvtool++.
It is my first package so any comment will be really appreciate.
We already have flvtool2 in the archive, please compare and contrast the two.
It might be a good idea
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 5:46 PM, Vincent MAUGE vma...@gmail.com wrote:
As it's write on the official website of flvtool++, it's write with
performance in mind.
Seems like a useful characteristic, would you say that flvtool2 should
be removed in favour of flvtool++?
flvtool2 doesn't have a
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 7:14 AM, Sage Weil s...@newdream.net wrote:
Upstream Author : Sage Weil s...@newdream.net
ceph-kclient-source - source for kernel client module
Do you plan to get the kernel module merged into Linux at some point?
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 11:34 AM, Muammar El Khatib
muammarelkha...@gmail.com wrote:
Could somebody help me with this? I'll appreciate any argument and
thoughts from all of you.
This is usually due to GTK+ and friends using Requires instead of
Requires.private in /usr/lib/pkgconfig/*.pc:
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 12:03 AM, Miguel Landaeta mig...@miguel.cc wrote:
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 11:58 PM, Paul Wise p...@debian.org wrote:
A workaround is to add -Wl,--as-needed to LDFLAGS, Gentoo has a
document about that here:
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/qa/asneeded.xml
Please note
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 9:42 AM, Ryan Niebur ryanrya...@gmail.com wrote:
remove it in your clean target. since you're regenerating it, it'll be
fine if it's not there already. and removed files don't show up in the
.diff.gz.
you should use dh_clean t(1)o remove it. (just add it to
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 11:04 AM, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
Thanks for any advice
I didn't see any problem/question in your message. If any problem
exists, I suggest reading the dh_install and dh_installdirs manual
pages to solve it.
This is good general advice for all people asking questions here,
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 11:46 AM, Jaromír Mikeš mira.mi...@seznam.cz wrote:
Is it allowed to solve this by editing-patching makefile?
As the maintainer of the package, you can do as you please.
As a sponsor of packages, I would consider your solution to be appropriate.
I suggest you convince
2009/3/24 Stefanos Harhalakis v...@v13.gr:
The package consists of an init script, two initramfs scripts and two helper
scripts, so I consider it to be 100% tied to debian and debian-based
distributions. I cannot provide a set of scripts for other OSes and this is
not an program that one can
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 2:06 PM, Jaromír Mikeš mira.mi...@seznam.cz wrote:
There is outdated link in maintainers guide for menu.ex.
http://www.debian.org/doc/maint-guide/ch-dother.en.html
/usr/share/doc/debian-policy/menu-policy.html/
apt-file search menu-policy.html
Can I ask where I can
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 11:37 PM, Luca Niccoli wrote:
Actually I'm not running automake, do I need to?
Not unless you are patching Makefile.am
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe.
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 12:25 AM, David García Garzón
dgar...@iua.upf.edu wrote:
* Should I split this RFS thread into several as i did for the ITP bugs?
No need to.
* The only lintian warning i get is:
W: libclam13: package-name-doesnt-match-sonames libclam-audioio13 libclam-
core13
Hi all,
At [1] we have a fairly comprehensive list of possible metrics
(quality and otherwise) sponsors may want to prioritise packages to be
reviewed/uploaded on. I'm wondering if there is anything obvious
missing from the list.
Also, if you have documented your criteria for sponsorship, please
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 4:41 AM, David García Garzón
dgar...@iua.upf.edu wrote:
So, by discarding joining the libs, what are remaining the options? splitting
packages? ignoring warnings?
Either, I would split them. IIRC the lintian warning may be disabled
when the number in the SONAME is the
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 8:31 AM, Luca Niccoli lultimou...@gmail.com wrote:
After I'm done with packaging this version I'll take some time to
understand well how the whole localization stuff is dealt with in the
build infrastructure and I'll write upstream.
Do you have pointers?
Nothing other
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 8:28 PM, Peter Pentchev r...@ringlet.net wrote:
Now... I know about - and use, and love - the Vcs-Svn and Vcs-Browser
control fields. However, I would like to have the unstable package contain
some kind of pointers to my own Lenny and Etch ports to avoid duplication
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 5:17 PM, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
I would be glad if someone uploaded these packages for me. This
fixes #498369 and will allow eog-plugins to be packaged.
You seem to have done the WNPP stuff wrong:
Why are you hijacking this ITP without notifying the bug?
Why does
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 11:42 PM, Paul Wise wrote:
Why are you hijacking this ITP without notifying the bug?
Sorry, I missed that #498369 is an RFP.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
2009/3/30 Francisco García wrote:
- dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/lynis/lynis_1.2.5-1.dsc
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Uploaded, thanks for your contribution to Debian.
Please mail this list as usual for the next upload.
--
bye,
pabs
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 3:43 AM, Adam Ziaja azi...@gmail.com wrote:
Do you have any signs that upstream is still alive? It looks like a bit
dead project from quick look.
No, I just made this package, because of
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=469088 where this
program is
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 9:13 AM, Jaromír Mikeš mira.mi...@seznam.cz wrote:
dpkg-source: cannot represent change to autowaf.pyc: binary file contents
changed
...
dpkg-source: unrepresentable changes to source
...
Can somebody check this file and advise me please?
I am not familiar with
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 10:33 AM, Daniel Moerner dmoer...@gmail.com wrote:
It can be worthwhile to look at openSUSE, Gentoo, Fedora, etc.
packaging to see if there are patches upstream hasn't applied, etc.
apt-get install whohas
whohas mixer
click click click
wish for #516572 to be fixed
--
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 1:35 PM, Jaromír Mikeš mira.mi...@seznam.cz wrote:
I tried change ./configure to $(WAF) configure on line 34 in my debian/rules,
but I got same result.
debian/rules is a makefile, I suggest reading the make documentation
to figure this one out.
--
bye,
pabs
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 1:27 AM, Tristan Greaves tris...@extricate.org wrote:
I'm wondering if there is a simple way when running pbuilder to 'see' if it
has put any files in $HOME ?
If it completes successfully, it clears its staging area, so I can't go
in afterwards to see what it did.
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 3:06 PM, Jaromír Mikeš mira.mi...@seznam.cz wrote:
xargs: xargs.c:443: main: Assertion `bc_ctl.arg_max = (131072-2048)' failed.
...
Can somebody advise me please what does it mean?
Seems fairly obvious from Google:
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 11:09 PM, Alex Hermosilla wrote:
Yes. You can do it by reportbug
Specifically 'reportbug wnpp' and follow the prompts.
You may also want to read these:
http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/
http://people.debian.org/~mpalmer/debian-mentors_FAQ.html
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 3:00 AM, Grammostola Rosea wrote:
O, I've uploaded an packages and requested for an sponsor, also mailed it to
the list. What is next? Wait and see? But what if potential sponsors are not
satisfied with my package? Can I get some comments, or does this mean I sit
and
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 10:48 PM, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
Please have a look again.
I'm not sponsoring new packages at the moment, but here is a review:
If you haven't read libpkg-guide (and its two bugs), please do so.
Please add symbols files.
sed -i -e 's/documentary of/documentation
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 6:46 AM, Sjoerd Simons sjo...@luon.net wrote:
On Wed, Apr 01, 2009 at 11:19:53PM +0200, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
I didn't know about them / their plan of packaging libchamplain so
far. There was no ITP, but just an RFP. But perhaps you guys want
to sponsor my package? :)
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 1:27 AM, Tiago Bortoletto Vaz
ti...@debian-ba.org wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package rakarrack.
...
- dget
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/rakarrack/rakarrack_0.3.0-1.dsc
I'm not sponsoring new packages at the moment, but here is a review of
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 7:46 AM, Ben Finney ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au wrote:
Paul Wise p...@debian.org writes:
s/maintained/debianized/ debian/control
Can this neologism “debianized” be replaced instead with “packaged”?
Please file bugs on dh-make, dh-make-perl, dh-make-php and dh-make
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 8:30 AM, Ben Finney wrote:
Perhaps. In the meantime, can we agree that it should not be
exacerbated in the case of this package?
That is up to the maintainer, I am happy to recommend the wording
change for this package.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 10:50 AM, Peter Pentchev r...@ringlet.net wrote:
- dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/h/hexer/hexer_0.1.4c-3.dsc
I'm unable to sponsor at the moment, but I took a look at the diff.gz.
Please remove the lintian overrides, you should only override lintian
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 5:13 AM, ERSEK Laszlo wrote:
I kindly request you to put the package in NEW for me.
Packages only go through NEW when they are introduced to Debian or
when they add new binary packages.
I'll have another look later today.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 6:38 AM, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
how-to sign .dsc and .changes files?
Just running debsign is usually enough.
I tried $ debsing -sgpg file.changes
and have error: secret key not available
Perhaps debsign is unable to find out which key you want to use,
please use -k or
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 8:49 AM, Jaromír Mikeš mira.mi...@seznam.cz wrote:
I have lintian 1.23.46 installed here, I am working on 8.04 Ubuntu based
distro.
You should be building, installing and testing on a Debian sid system.
Please install a chroot or VM with Debian sid on it for the
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 7:16 PM, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
X: slv2: spelling-error-in-binary ./usr/bin/lv2_jack_host succesfully
successfully
X: slv2: spelling-error-in-binary ./usr/bin/lv2_simple_jack_host succesfully
successfully
These two you need to tell upstream about their spelling error.
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 8:54 PM, Bobyr Raisa Efimovna wrote:
Me'm the maintainer of this project but don't have access right to put
updates.
Torsten Werner mail.twer...@googlemail.com and Mazen Neifer
ma...@freepascal.org helped me to join then with the COMMIT stuff but
currently don't
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 3:32 AM, Grammostola Rosea wrote:
pkg-shlibdeps: warning: symbol sqrt used by
debian/jack-mixer/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/_jack_mixer_c.so found in
none of the libraries.
According to the sqrt manual page you need to link with -lm
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning:
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 9:27 PM, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
I put this line to my debian/rules:
dpkg-gensymbols -plibslv2-9 -Olibslv2-9.symbols
You should only run that manually to create the initial symbols file,
dh_makeshlibs should take care of running the right dpkg-gensymbols
call during the
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 9:34 PM, Grammostola Rosea
rosea.grammost...@gmail.com wrote:
How do I link with -lm?
Add it to the link command. How that is done depends on the upstream
build system.
you mean in jack_mixer.c? Can't find it in that file.
No, in the upstream build system.
Another
On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 5:10 AM, Andrew a.star...@gmail.com wrote:
This is the one suggestion I didn't follow. As the VSC is bzr and it
is hosted on Launchpad, the two fields become a bit redundant. The
same url can be used to both bring you to the Vcs-Browser web-page as
well as checkout the
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 5:09 AM, Reijo Tomperi
aggr...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
Thanks again, but the question is more about whether we should use git logs,
or ticket list (of closed tickets), or just the short summary we put in
sourceforge news page. Not really sure what people would
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 3:45 AM, Kristina Chodorow krist...@10gen.com wrote:
.deb available at http://downloads.mongodb.org/linux/mongodb_0.9.1-1_i386.deb
Binary packages are useless for sponsors, please link to the .dsc
instead. The RFS template on mentors.d.n is useful even for packages
not
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 7:21 AM, Iustin Pop iu...@k1024.org wrote:
So I stumbled upon a maybe-failed buildd log after a new upload, and I was
wondering if I could get automatically the logs by email.
The best you can do is run getbuildlog from devscripts or visit here:
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 11:38 AM, Ben Finney wrote:
While that template is useful for prompting some of the information
needed in an RFS, it is still sadly deficient in some ways. How should
we report bugs and patches against it?
Send a patch for debexpo to debexpo-devel:
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 6:56 PM, Grammostola Rosea wrote:
Stephan Peijnik wrote:
An RFP is not an ITP. Change that to an ITP if you Intend To
Package (actually you already did that).
How do you change this?
http://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control#retitle
--
bye,
pabs
2009/4/15 Laurent Léonard laur...@open-minds.org:
* Shouldn't the package has a versioning indicating that it was modified
from upstream, with a dfsg suffix?
I'm not sure about that, if a DD could give an opinion on this...
I can't find any reference for this but yes, add +dfsg1 to the
2009/4/15 Laurent Léonard laur...@open-minds.org:
So the final version number for the package should be 0.2+dfsg-2 (0.2-1
already exists in Sid) ?
Yep.
What is the difference between .dfsg, -dfsg and +dfsg suffixes ? With or
without the - character after dfsg ?
Sorting. 1.2.dfsg sorts
2009/4/16 Laurent Léonard laur...@open-minds.org:
So .dfsg is a bad suffix ? And +dfsg should be used in priority ? If
1.2+dfsg/1.2-dfsg/1.2dfsg sort before 1.2.1 why are there different
suffixes ? I don't find clear informations about that on the Debian policy...
Yes (but not very), yes (or
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 9:54 AM, Jaromír Mikeš mira.mi...@seznam.cz wrote:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
libpango1.0-0: Depends: libdatrie0 (= 0.1.2) but it is not installable
The following actions will resolve these dependencies:
This looks like a question for debian-user.
2009/4/18 Laurent Léonard laur...@open-minds.org:
Correct me if I'm wrong, but the licensing problem only concerns 1
documentation file in the package, other ones are under GPL-2+, so I think
dfsg versioning isn't needed...
The upstream tarball isn't fully DFSG-free so we remove the bad bits,
2009/4/18 Laurent Léonard laur...@open-minds.org:
Is there a standard or a recommendation for the content of the changelog
file ?
You'll find all of Debian's policies and best practices WRT
debian/changelog in debian-policy and developers-reference.
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 5:49 AM, Benjamin Drung
benjamin.dr...@gmail.com wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2.1.6-0.1
of my package easytag.
It isn't appropriate to NMU new upstream versions.
The other changes certainly aren't appropriate in an NMU, please read
the
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 10:54 PM, Brent Clark brentgclarkl...@gmail.com wrote:
Would anyone be interested in packaging I2P.
The right way to request packages is to file an RFP bug against the
wnpp pseudo-package, not mail this list.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 8:30 AM, Elías A. M. eal...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok, I will take it into account. But first I would like first, the upstream
author's opinion or some mentor.
I think may be: popular command-line mp3 player
(according to: http://mpg321.sourceforge.net/)
Since upstream
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 10:33 PM, Jaromír Mikeš mira.mi...@seznam.cz wrote:
Problem creating account:
...
Having error:
global name 'name' is not defined
Woops, my fault (typo). Should be fixed now.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
2009/4/21 Stefanos Harhalakis v...@v13.gr:
fsprotect needs a directory under the root filesystem to preexist. Most
probably it won't be used by normal users, so this won't be common. In IRC it
was mentioned that it could should use /lib/fsprotect, but this directory is
already used to store a
2009/4/22 Laurent Léonard laur...@open-minds.org:
Is there a naming recommendation for patches when using quilt in a Debian
package ?
patch-name.diff ?
I don't use this because of the extension.
patch-name.patch ?
I personally prefer this.
0X-patch-name.diff ?
0X-patch-name.patch ?
On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 3:02 AM, Jonas Meurer jo...@freesources.org wrote:
I intend to maintain libmimelib1 as a seperate source package now that
kdepim 3.5.9 has been removed from debian/unstable.
What does lurker link against on other distros that have moved to KDE4?
--
bye,
pabs
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 6:10 AM, Sandro Tosi mo...@debian.org wrote:
A part from some minor things on debian/changelog (not worthing a new
upload or be fixed in the next one), there is a lintian tag you want
to address:
I: smplayer-themes source: dfsg-version-with-period 0.1.19.dfsg-1
(run
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 1:05 AM, Neil Williams codeh...@debian.org wrote:
Well, maybe. OTOH sometimes it is better to explain why RFS emails get
ignored, otherwise the ping requests get more and more pointless.
I'm hoping the debexpo codebase for mentors.d.n will help here. One of
the proposed
2009/4/27 Laurent Léonard laur...@open-minds.org:
I didn't found any standard template for DFSG and various files removing for
README.source, so can I use the following generic sentence ?
I personally prefer to write a get-orig-source target that shows
exactly how the orig.tar.gz was
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 11:01 PM, Resul Cetin resul-ce...@gmx.net wrote:
Will (as you can read above) only create a file called 'download'. Inside is a
html file with the link hidden somewhere. Does anyone has experience or an
idea how to write a working debian/watch file for such a project?
101 - 200 of 2536 matches
Mail list logo