On Nov 14, 2007 8:06 AM, Chris Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/daemonlogger/daemonlogger_1.0-1.dsc
That doesn't exist, here are some comments on the one that does:
Be sure to send the manual page upstream, and maybe the patch is also
appropriate.
On Nov 14, 2007 8:50 AM, Robin Cornelius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package libllmozlib.
Some comments on your package:
lots of commented out stuff in debian/rules that doesn't need to be there
copyright file looks like a good candidate for reformatting as per
On Nov 14, 2007 9:40 PM, Chris Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I added lintian overrides for those errors as they are false positives.
No, they are not:
Change
Disable logging, instead mirror traffic from -i interface to -o interface.
to
Disable logging, instead mirror traffic from \-i
On Nov 14, 2007 6:50 PM, Robin Cornelius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Where did the orig.tar.gz really come from? I can only find tarballs
and zip files that use dates as version numbers instead of 1.1.1-2.
This is where the problems start, because upstream is a mess and I have
made the
On Nov 15, 2007 12:32 AM, Clint Burfoot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
liberror-perl is a Perl module for error/exception handling in an OO-
ish way. It has been in debian since 1999.
You might want to join the debian perl team, maintain it in their SVN
and benefit from the pool of sponsors and
On Nov 16, 2007 11:44 AM, Manuel García [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
might want to use the special syntax for sf.net in your watch file
(see uscan manual page)
Where should i add this variables?
debian/watch is the watch file. If you read the uscan manual page,
you'll see this:
# If
On Nov 16, 2007 11:45 AM, Paul Wise [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
debian/docs should have one file per line
I forgot to say that the README file doesn't need to be installed
since it is duplicated in the package description. You might also want
to install the THANKS file.
--
bye,
pabs
http
On Nov 13, 2007 10:09 PM, Francesco Cecconi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package kopete-otr.
A review of your package:
Any reason you use automake1.9 instead of the default version of
automake (1.10)?
extra blank lines at the end of debian/control debian/watch
On Nov 16, 2007 1:50 AM, Manuel Garcia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2.9.0-1
of my package gnomad2.
A review of your package:
Might want to add a Homepage: http://wiki.debian.org/HomepageFieldHOWTO
why not remove this line from debian/rules?
#
On Oct 15, 2007 8:13 PM, Peter Collingbourne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my packages ladr and prover9-manual
(I am packaging the documentation separately because upstream distributes
it in a separate tarball).
a review of the ladr package:
you might want to use
On Nov 16, 2007 5:45 PM, Neil Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Paul, please take care recommending that syntax. What should be used is:
Apologies, I pasted the stuff that dh_make recommends, assumed it was
correct. Is there a bug filed about this?
--
bye,
pabs
On Nov 16, 2007 4:53 PM, Andres Mejia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package mediatomb.
Another review, minor issues:
Homepage doesn't need to be duplicated in the descriptions
Vcs-* are official, no need for the XS-
Encoding key in the .desktop file is
On Nov 11, 2007 8:05 AM, LI Daobing [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package yac163.
A review of your package:
Might want to ask upstream to remove their debian/ dir, makes things a
lot easier for Debian sponsors and maintainers too.
first 2 lines in the watch file
On Oct 15, 2007 8:13 PM, Peter Collingbourne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my packages ladr and prover9-manual
(I am packaging the documentation separately because upstream distributes
it in a separate tarball).
a review of the ladr package:
you might want to use
On Nov 16, 2007 7:45 PM, Francesco Cecconi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hmm, I'm not sure about those lintian overrides, perhaps the library
should be either made into a private library or split out into a
separate package?
the package is very small, and the libraries not important for
On Nov 12, 2007 7:18 PM, Thomas de Grivel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 4.3.0-1
of my package stk.
You seem to be adopting the package, but you don't close an O or ITA.
stk doesn't seem to be orphaned either, so this would be a package
hijack. The
On Nov 12, 2007 1:51 AM, Alexander Rodin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package qstardict.
A review of your package:
debian/docs should have one file per line
move the homepage to a proper field: http://wiki.debian.org/HomepageFieldHOWTO
in the description, either
On Nov 18, 2007 8:44 AM, Diego Fdez. Durán [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been using Debian for a few years and now I would help. I've read
the Debian Developer's Reference but I don't know any interesting (and
little) software that I can package to get involved.
I maintain a list of
On Nov 19, 2007 5:53 AM, Robin Cornelius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package libcares.
Awww, Debian definitely needs more caring, here is a review of your package.
Upstream source package is c-ares rather than libcares, any reason for
the change?
No Homepage
On Nov 19, 2007 9:28 PM, Kobayashi Noritada
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
However, this is due to a temporary rename of debian/menu to
debian/menu.ex and I'd love to rename that file again in the next
version in which I'm planning to enable the Debian menu. So, this is
a temporary issue.
You
On Nov 19, 2007 6:53 PM, Robin Cornelius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Which way do you suggest I should go with the naming? I can recreate a
c-ares package if required or stick with the libcares name.
I suggest:
source package: c-ares: because the upstream tarball is named this way
lib binary
On Nov 21, 2007 4:32 AM, Eriberto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I need a sponsor for my package iceweasel-firegpg (GPL 2).
Can or does it work with other gecko-based browsers like Epiphany?
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
On Nov 23, 2007 7:10 PM, Robin Cornelius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So it think that is now all the issues you raised with the package dealt with.
Some minor issues (only the first is a show-stopper):
inet_ntop.c isn't under the MIT licence as debian/copyright suggests.
Change:
/---
On Nov 19, 2007 3:40 AM, Eriberto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.eriberto.pro.br/debian/pacotes/album-4.02-debian.tar.gz
Please link to the .dsc file, preferably uploaded to mentors.debian.net
The new changelog:
* New upstream release.
* New maintainer (Closes: #430982, #338696).
On Nov 18, 2007 4:50 PM, Simo Kauppi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would appreciate if somebody could take a look at the package and point out
any packaging mistakes in it.
A review of your package:
Don't forget to send your patches upstream.
Might want to ask upstream to split FAQ 2-6 out into
On Nov 19, 2007 2:34 AM, Bradley Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package atheme-services.
A review of your package:
Why do you copy config.sub/config.guess in the clean target instead of
the configure target?
Don't forget to send patches upstream to fix their
On Nov 24, 2007 9:35 AM, Francesco Namuri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
common-install-arch::
chrpath --delete
debian/gnome-phone-manager/usr/bin/gnome-phone-manager
Precisely, this did the trick. Just add 'chrpath' to the build-deps too.
Update it in the SVN and I'll upload it.
On Nov 25, 2007 12:17 PM, Giuseppe Benigno
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package konq-pdf.
Any reason these files couldn't be part of konqueror and show up only
when the required packages are installed?
Alternatively expand the scope of the package to general
On Nov 25, 2007 1:29 PM, Giuseppe Benigno
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any reason these files couldn't be part of konqueror and show up only
when the required packages are installed?
No, there is no reason, I will be very happy if this little project
could be integrated in konqueror/d3lphin,
On Nov 4, 2007 3:38 PM, Thomas Goirand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's my second try to search for a sponsor for these 2 packages
(libdbi 0.8.2-1 and libdbi-drivers 0.8.2-1-1). They are lintian clean,
and the upstream make check is running ok.
A review of your packages:
Please don't ship
On Nov 26, 2007 10:01 AM, Paul Wise [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A review of your packages:
Woops, that was just libdbi, here is one for libdbi-drivers:
Same issue with config.sub/guess.
drivers/firebird/dbd_firebird.loT needs to be removed on clean
Homepage: field should not have around
On Nov 26, 2007 8:30 AM, JackTheDipper
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just uploaded the newest upstream version and tried to fulfill the
debian policy.
It's now pbuilder and lintian clean.
E, I guess the diff.gz is empty because you are upstream? Can I
suggest that you put the debian/
On Nov 25, 2007 10:01 PM, David Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package, envctrl. I previously posted asking
for a sponsor and got some useful feedback, but nobody was able to sponsor
it. It is a somewhat difficult package to sponsor since it contain kernel
On Nov 24, 2007 9:37 PM, Eriberto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After my little mistake about multiple licenses, I am trying to put my
package in Debian once more (I need a sponsor).
Please post the URL to the .dsc next time and preferrably use
mentors.debian.net.
A review of your package:
You
On Nov 24, 2007 10:39 AM, Erick Mattos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package codeblocks.
Why is your diff.gz empty?
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
On Nov 26, 2007 10:54 AM, Paul Wise [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A review of your package:
I forgot to say that the source package name should probably be
firegpg rather than iceweasel-firegpg since that is what the upstream
SVN uses.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
The best way to deal with this is to write a new patch (or many) that
makes the upstream build system or code configurable enough that the
Debian-specific patch isn't needed, get that new patch integrated
upstream and then make those Debian-specific changes using options to
./configure (or its
On Nov 26, 2007 3:36 PM, Andres Mejia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package mediatomb.
A more thorough review of your package:
doc/mediatomb.1 is generated from docbook xml, but that source code
isn't available in the source package. This means the package cannot
, and
preferrable to some.
Paul Wise wrote:
You might want to support noopt too.
What's that?
Like nostrip, but ensures that the package is build with no
optimisation (gcc -O0). Useful for people debugging crashes.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
On Nov 26, 2007 6:20 PM, Thomas Goirand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Most of the time, I see people using -O2 instead. I'd find using a poor
optimization level only for some that needs debugging quite frustrating.
Can't people wishing to do debugging recompile the package (and even
remove the
On Nov 27, 2007 1:03 AM, JackTheDipper
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Again, thank you very much for your help! A new version has just been
uploaded to debian mentors and is waiting for reviewing. ;-)
Jack
[please reply directly to the list]
More review:
please spell-check your package
Awesome fan art btw :)
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Nov 27, 2007 9:34 PM, Robin Cornelius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This has all become unneeded work
http://packages.debian.org/sid/libc-ares1
/me sighs and smiles at the same time
:) I guess you'll be more careful when opening WNPP bugs in future.
My final version was upload to mentors,
On Nov 28, 2007 4:12 AM, David Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While getting merged upstream is the ultimate goal, we'd like to wait until
the driver is more feature complete and better tested.
If we can get this package into Debian's experimental repository, it'll make
it much easier for
On Jul 20, 2007 4:55 PM, Luis Uribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2.3-1
of my package mxml.
Is the version 2.4-1 on mentors ready to be uploaded?
If so, I think it should be uploaded since overall it improves apon
the package already in Debian.
That
On Nov 26, 2007 4:36 PM, Thomas Goirand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I suspect (didn't check) that you are missing some copyright info
since there are lots of upstream authors, but only one copyright
holder.
Yes, my copyright file was really wrong, and the package was rejected by
[I'm on the list no need to CC me]
On Nov 28, 2007 6:15 PM, Bart Martens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As far as I know, it has not yet been decided that the debian/copyright
files must be formatted as described on the wiki page quoted above. Or
did I miss some decision ?
You didn't miss
On Nov 28, 2007 8:28 PM, Bas Wijnen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IMO there's nothing wrong with suggesting to do things in a certain way,
even if there is no consensus about that (yet). Perhaps this suggestion
looked a bit too much like this is how it should be done and not
enough like you could
On Dec 11, 2007 1:31 AM, Carlos Silombria (Silverdog)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You don't include a debian/watch file and a debian/rules
get-orig-source target that knows how to recreate your .orig.tar.gz
from the files that upstream provides
How can i do in this case for the watch file?
On Dec 22, 2007 9:38 AM, Joerg Jaspert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
tim wrote:
Has anyone pinged Eduardo recently? This is an important package, which
needs proper maintainance. The upload should probably be sponsored via
debian-multimedia rather than QA. Opinions, Offers? :)
Its in no way
On Dec 15, 2007 4:56 AM, Keith Stribley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package kmfl-keyboards-mywin.
---| Stuff that should be fixed before this gets uploaded:
scim-kmfl-imengine needs to enter Debian:
On Dec 28, 2007 1:34 PM, Paul Wise [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 15, 2007 4:56 AM, Keith Stribley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package kmfl-keyboards-mywin.
I forgot to say that you may want to register for an account on
alioth, request to join pkg-ime
On Dec 23, 2007 2:00 AM, chaica [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package yougrabber.
In addition to Raphael's comments;
I tried yougrabber and youtube-dl on these URLs and none of them
worked in yougrabber, but they did in youtube-dl:
On Dec 28, 2007 1:12 PM, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.4.0-3
of my package thailatex.
Uploaded, please contact this list for future sponsoring.
Question:
Where does debian/babel.sty come from? Shouldn't it be generated at
On Dec 28, 2007 4:12 PM, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Dec 28, 2007 at 03:28:15PM +0930, Paul Wise wrote:
Question:
Where does debian/babel.sty come from? Shouldn't it be generated at
build time or something?
It was taken from tetex (now texlive) package
comments from my side ...
Seems it has now passed through http://incoming.debian.org/ and is now
at http://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/t/thailatex/thailatex_0.4.0-3.dsc
On Fr, 28 Dez 2007, Paul Wise wrote:
Ah. Perhaps it would be appropriate to ask the upstream texlive people
to add the patch
On Dec 29, 2007 8:04 AM, CaStarCo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package freetube.
I don't think such a small script (wrapper around youtube-dl and
ffmpeg2theora) should be uploaded to Debian, except as part of another
package. Perhaps it could be added to
On Jan 14, 2008 5:27 AM, Mel Gorman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor/reviewer for my package libhugetlbfs.
Since this is a new library package, it would be good if you used the
new symbols stuff:
http://wiki.debian.org/Projects/ImprovedDpkgShlibdeps
On Jan 18, 2008 8:08 AM, Matthias Julius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I could file an RC bug myself to prevent it from migrating into
testing and to let people know that it is going to be flaky on 64bit
archs.
Better to run a test suite or otherwise cause an FTBFS on
architectures where it is
On Jan 20, 2008 8:25 PM, Thomas Viehmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also, the upstream URL seems to have changed to
http://na.mirror.garr.it/mirrors/appuntilinux/
there also seems to be a new upstream version.
Is there any indication that anyone is actually using this except for the
On Jan 27, 2008 4:37 PM, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.4.2-1
of my package thailatex.
cttex is no longer in Debian because it was orphaned and had no
users[1]. Please remove the recommends or re-introduce the package to
On Jan 30, 2008 4:59 PM, picca [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2:0.1.2-1
of my package lisaac.
Please use a proper subject line next time.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
On Jan 31, 2008 3:16 AM, Wen-Yen Chuang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package xf86-input-tslib.
You may think it as xserver-xorg-input-tslib, a tslib based X server
input device driver.
I'd suggest that you join the X Strike Force:
On Feb 2, 2008 7:55 AM, Prach Pongpanich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.23-2
of my package cttex. This package has been removed from debian package
repository, because it was orphaned.
Your orig.tar.gz is different from the 1.23-1 one on
On Feb 2, 2008 1:20 PM, Paul Wise [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Your orig.tar.gz is different from the 1.23-1 one on snapshot.debian.net, why?
Looking at the code, it seems you checked it out of CVS again, best
just to use the old tarball.
In addition, it seems there is a new upstream version
On Feb 2, 2008 3:48 PM, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In addition, it seems there is a new upstream version, or a fork or
something (I don't read Thai):
http://vuthi.blogspot.com/2004/07/cttex.html
You might want to figure out what the deal is there.
It's the
On Jan 31, 2008 11:19 AM, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.1.9-2
of my package libthai.
A review:
Maybe libthai0/libthai-data shouldn't have any docs (README/TODO/etc)
in them since those are mostly automatically installed,
On Jan 27, 2008 4:37 PM, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.4.2-1
of my package thailatex.
lintian -I:
I: thailatex source: build-depends-without-arch-dep dpkg-dev
debian/control:
...based on _the_ babel package...
s/Thai
A review of your package:
debian/control:
s/insert/inserting/
debian/copyright:
files-in-licence
commas-missing-in-copyright
blurbs-missing-in-licence
debian/rules:
nostrip is handled by dh_strip now
CFLAGS doesn't seem to be passed to configure
h, not sure about make -j2 - isn't there
On Feb 5, 2008 9:44 PM, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
blurbs-missing-in-licence
Done, although thinking equally not-a-bug.
Please revert that, sorry for the noise.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
On Feb 5, 2008 7:21 PM, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If it's to be changed, I'd rather bump the versions in the
symbols file to 0.1.7 and ignore etch completely. Would
there be any drawback in doing so?
Sounds fine given the private symbols stuff.
For the standard This
On Feb 5, 2008 9:44 PM, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
blurbs-missing-in-licence
Done, although thinking equally not-a-bug.
Please revert that, sorry for the noise.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
On Feb 6, 2008 8:30 PM, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
warzone2100/warzone2100-data is one example of such a pair of descriptions.
Thanks. I hope my similar modification is fine.
Yep, it is.
So, I'll upload once you remove the licence blurb I wrongly asked you to
On Feb 6, 2008 4:15 PM, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I got another idea to solve this: just drop babel.sty from
thailatex, and copy it from texlive-latex-base with edition
on postinst. Also remove it on prerm.
Done, and updated with version unchanged:
On Feb 6, 2008 8:41 PM, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Done and uploaded:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/swath/swath_0.3.2-1.dsc
Uploaded, please contact this list for future uploads.
Other changes left?
For next time:
Well, I just checked the Vcs-*
On Feb 7, 2008 11:03 PM, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A minor follow-up, please. My debian/rules appeared to fail
on arch builds, for example:
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=libthaiver=0.1.9-2arch=amd64stamp=1202305145file=log
So, I have moved libdatrie-bin
On Feb 7, 2008 3:00 PM, Kartik Mistry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
chmlib
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/chmlib/chmlib_0.39-7.dsc
Uploaded.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
Feb 13, 2008 3:53 AM, Giancarlo Niccolai [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The checks performed by Ubuntu maintainers have been quite extensive
and deep, and the package should be ready as is; so, I am requesting a
sponsor to forward the package in Debian too.
I was intrigued by this claim, so here is
On Feb 13, 2008 7:58 PM, Thibaut Paumard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
how can you find out the position in the queue?
Here for one:
http://buildd.debian.org/~jeroen/status/package.php?p=yorick
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
On Feb 14, 2008 4:28 AM, Giancarlo Niccolai [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
License proliferation is bad, but it's a lesser evil with respect to
license fuzziness.
FPL license is derived from Apache2. Among OSI accepted license,
Apache2 was the one covering exactly the needs of Falcon project
On Feb 14, 2008 1:20 PM, Charles Plessy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is a minor new upstream release for a package I maintain, but on
the other hand the current build will enter testing tomorrow. I
therefore tried a delayed upload, but as I am a DM, I have no access to
gluck. Is there a
On Feb 16, 2008 11:13 AM, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there any equivalent to 'apt-get autoclean' to remove unnecessary
packages installed by pbuilder? I looked in
http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/software/pbuilder-doc/pbuilder-doc.html
but could not find anything.
You
On Feb 18, 2008 9:28 PM, Patrick Schoenfeld
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- dget
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/n/nettee/nettee_0.1.8-3.dsc
Some additional comments:
Now to your package:
- debian/changelog
s/rewrited/rewritten/
- debian/copyright
Please move Copyright (C)
On Feb 20, 2008 6:27 AM, Mauro Lizaur [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It builds these binary packages:
ee - An easy editor for novices and compuphobics
What are compuphobics? Sounds like a word that should not be in a
short description.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To
On Feb 19, 2008 2:44 AM, Neutron Soutmun [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- - dget
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xiterm+thai/xiterm+thai_1.07-1.dsc
Some comments:
Unless you need new features of debhelper compat 6, please leave it at
the latest compat level available in stable.
On Feb 20, 2008 8:53 AM, Francisco García [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have made the changes that you suggest me. I think
the package is better now.
Uploaded, thanks for your contribution to Debian.
Please take care of the lintian -I messages about unescaped hyphens in
the manual page in the
On Feb 20, 2008 11:08 PM, Toby Smithe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you check the fluid-soundfont package, you will find it only has
four files outside of the Debian directory. There has to be an
authoritative original source that we trust, and in this case the
original source is at [0]. I'm
On Feb 21, 2008 12:01 AM, Toby Smithe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are the two binary files in there prebuilt, or are they what you would
edit if you wanted to change the soundfont? I'm thinking of DFSG #2
here. Which package would I edit them with?
No, the sf2 format is the preferred
On Feb 21, 2008 12:28 AM, Toby Smithe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 3:22 PM, Paul Wise [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What made you choose /usr/share/sounds/sf2 for installing the
soundfont? I notice that freepats uses /usr/share/midi for this.
This is the directory
On Feb 21, 2008 12:04 AM, Paul Wise [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please leave a note about this in debian/changelog or debian/copyright
for the ftpmasters.
What made you choose /usr/share/sounds/sf2 for installing the
soundfont? I notice that freepats uses /usr/share/midi for this.
debian
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 1:46 PM, Neutron Soutmun [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- - dget
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xiterm+thai/xiterm+thai_1.07-1.dsc
To whom may download this package before, please re-download for the
update by the comments below:
Description
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 2:11 PM, Paul Wise [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Description suggestion:
Description: X terminal program with Thai languague support
xiterm+thai is an X terminal emulator program with Thai language
support. It has built-in Thai keyboard input support
Woops, forwarding to the list.
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 11:13 PM, Paul Wise [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Uploaded the package. Please contact this list for future uploads.
Please investigate and fix these warnings for the next upload:
There are lots of GCC warnings.
dpkg-shlibdeps
On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 8:54 PM, Amaya [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Justin Pryzby wrote:
Does there exist a list of public usertags in use? I'd like to see
a big list of these, probably a good use of the wiki.
It's funny, I was wondering this myself just now :)
Any pointers?
From #debbugs
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 4:25 AM, Neutron Soutmun [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joerg Jaspert wrote:
Hi Maintainer,
rejected, your debian/copyright file is incomplete and misses
(C)holders/license data. You have to include all such differences.
Like that of the grkelot code.
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 12:10 PM, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 9:15 AM, Paul Wise [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, now there is a real problem, most of the licences mentioned are
non-free and cannot be put into main. Essentially all the files
Hi all,
[Please CC me in all replies, or reply only to me]
We've had bits from the DPL[1][2], bits from the release team[3], bits
from the listmasters[4] and bits from other people and groups within
Debian[5][6][7][8][9].
Since new contributors are important for Debian (or any free software
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 2:57 PM, Barry deFreese [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here is another one of my way too intrusive NMUs that closes RC bug
#465633 and bug #400257 as well as quite a bit of package cleanup,
standards update, etc.
If someone has time to review and/or upload I would
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 8:20 AM, Neil Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Neither orange in the archive nor the result of your NMU even work for
zip files (with unzip installed) nor other files where it should work.
From strace, it looks like it is acually extracting stuff, but then
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 2:52 PM, Bart Martens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2008-03-04 at 23:37 +, Neil Williams wrote:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/rcalc/rcalc_0.5.0-1.3.dsc
http://packages.qa.debian.org/r/rcalc/news/20080303T143226Z.html
This NMU seems to
401 - 500 of 2536 matches
Mail list logo
