On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 8:05 AM, Tony Houghton wrote:
Could debexpo be updated to fill those in? The old mentors template
generator used to.
If there was someone willing to submit a patch for it, I guess so.
The upstream URL would be easy, but I don't see how the license and
upstream author
On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 11:47 AM, Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
However you failed to clearly articulate the requirements you imposed on me
before taking action, neither were you willing to discuss the possible
solutions.
I suppose that was unfair of me, my apologies.
How about the following
2012/1/17 Björn Esser:
- huge modifactions
Get those included upstream.
- scripts to be replaced by 'debianized' ones
Make those scripts generic but configurable, send the required changes
upstream and drop in a second configuration file overriding the
defaults.
- to be extended
2012/1/17 Björn Esser:
I just wanted to ask how mature Package-format 3.0 (git) became until now.
It is not currently accepted by the Debian archive:
http://bugs.debian.org/642801
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 6:10 AM, Emilien Klein wrote:
I've worked with upstream Shaarli to fix the issue with the inclusion
of the minified jQuery files. Upstream has released a tarball that
uses the jQuery CDN instead of the local minified files (which have
been removed from the archive)
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 6:19 AM, Stephen Kitt wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package oss-compat. The updated package
adds a Multi-Arch declaration (#651335) and handles its configuration file
according to policy (#649507, which is RC).
The dsc is available at
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 8:28 AM, Alexey Eromenko wrote:
Yes, you should replace inside sources, and call it ~dfsg.
In general it should be +dfsg not ~dfsg.
~dfsg/+dfsg should only be added when repacking for DFSG-related
reasons, so not in this case.
--
bye,
pabs
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 8:05 AM, Paul Wise wrote:
I note that the package is installable on hurd-*. AFAICT Hurd doesn't
support sound or Alsa so maybe it should not depend on 'hurd' or
should switch to architecture linux-any (or linux-all if that
existed)?
The kind folks on #debian-hurd
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 6:37 AM, Martin Erik Werner wrote:
Hello again, upstream has now released Red Eclipse 1.2 and hence this is
partly a RFS, partly a re-review request.
...
[1]
Is this motivation good enough for not using stand-alone Enet?
Hmm, I don't have a good answer for that.
[2]
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 5:37 PM, Alexey Eromenko wrote:
Standard lintian gives me no errors, but only few warnings:
...
Why so huge diff ?
pabs@chianamo ~ $ cat ~/.lintianrc
info=yes
display-info=yes
display-experimental=yes
pedantic=yes
show-overrides=yes
color=auto
--
bye,
pabs
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 5:48 PM, Alexey Eromenko wrote:
I have copied your file, but now I get this:
user@xrig:/vm/tmp/vpcs-0.3$ lintian ../vpcs_0.3-1_amd64.deb
syntax error in configuration file: info=yes
I get no such error, hmmm.
Also, you should run lintian on the .changes file so that
On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 1:27 AM, Jasem Mutlaq wrote:
Ok, I got a confirmation from QSI that the source code for libqsi is
proprietary. They grant you the right to distribute source and binary
forms of the library, but not to modify the source itself. Can this be
added to Debian 'non-free' ?
On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 3:38 PM, Jasem Mutlaq wrote:
The driver that requires this library (INDI QSI driver) is released
under the LGPL v2.1. However, the library itself (QSI) is proprietary
and there is no open source alternative as this is a very special
purpose library for controlling
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 8:49 PM, Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
My apologies, I didn't mean to be rude for not replyng - I only noticed this
email of yours just now. Sorry for missing it.
No probs.
I reckon we can always talk first, before engaging the punishment actions. :)
My action was definitely
2012/1/18 Dmitry Smirnov :
I'm still looking for a sponsor for package tupi.
#
Tupi: 2D Magic is a design and authoring tool for digital artists interested
in 2D Animation, offering an interface experience focused on 8-100 years old
kids. It's source code is based on the KTooN
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 5:12 AM, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 08:54:57PM +0100, David Paleino wrote:
Uploaded, thanks for your contribution to Debian!
Whoa, looks like I was right: it really was a quick job for a
Debian Member ;)
Thank you for the upload!
I always get
Here is a review of your package:
I filed #657110 on lintian to check for commented out Vcs-* fields
pointing at collab-maint (which is created by dh_make). Please
consider implementing a patch for it so that others don't make the
same mistake.
You might want to run wrap-and-sort -s so diffs on
I don't intend to sponsor this, but here is a review:
Patch stuff is fugly.
The package FTBFS in pbuilder, I think you want dh --buildsystem=qmake
and a build-dep on libxtst-dev.
debian/README.source doesn't appear to be true.
Please ask upstream to remove the bogus configure file or fix it so
There was a mail about this on debian-devel-announce (which all Debian
folk should be subscribed to) just today:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2012/01/msg6.html
Then just create a new directory in the existing collab-maint svn
repository (probably under ext-maint).
--
bye,
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 6:47 PM, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
Yeah, I should probably have mentioned it, but mostly due to the fact
that I’ve added Vcs-* fields — or is collab-maint considered special
in this regard?
Right, collab-maint isn't special here.
Do you suggest mentioning the addition
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Godfrey Chung wrote:
Why do you duplicate src/92_pcscd_acsccid.rules as
debian/libacsccid1.udev? I would suggest deleting
debian/libacsccid1.udev and just using the upstream file.
Done. I created a symbolic link to upstream file.
Why? Isn't the existing file
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 6:02 PM, Godfrey Chung wrote:
I think the upstream will use it if openct exports this useful internal
function from the library and the upstream author did not want to reinvent
the wheel.
Please contact the openct upstream about that.
acsccid is a fork of ccid but it
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 7:24 AM, Joseph R. Justice wrote:
wouldn't it be more reasonable to use 3.0.y as the next Debian stable
release's kernel?
I mean, sure, if many of the other major Linux distributions, the ones
which can be considered as peers to Debian in terms of importance,
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 11:33 PM, Godfrey Chung wrote:
I sent the e-mail to Secure Testing Team at home tonight. Hope that they can
receive my e-mail. Thanks!
I've added your changes to SVN.
If yourself or anyone else wants to get involved in tracking security
issues in Debian, please take a
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 8:38 PM, Christian Welzel wrote:
what are the chances to get packages into debian main that contain
(mainly) Flash code? Its mostly ActionScript 3 code which cannot
compiled with tools from debian main (mtasc is only capable of AS2),
flex-sdk is not in debian at all.
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 3:45 PM, Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
By the way, do you think SVG worth attention?
Definitely, historically it wasn't well supported in web browsers,
that seems to be improving though.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
[Not sure if you are subscribed, so I am CCing you. I'm subscribed, no
need for a CC]
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 5:25 PM, Mathew Eis wrote:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libi/libicns/libicns_0.8.0-1.dsc
You are missing the debian/changelog entry (and probably the other
changes) from
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 8:02 PM, Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
Does anyone know if using dh-buildinfo is still recommended practice or
is it obsolete?
When dh-buildinfo is useful and what could be a typical use case?
For packages destined for the Debian archive it doesn't have much use
since we have
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 4:35 AM, Bas van den Dikkenberg wrote:
libapr-memcache0-dev - apr_memcache developer package is a client for
memcache
The dev package should be named libapr-memcache-dev instead.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 8:14 PM, Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/git2cl/git2cl_2.0+git200808271242-1.dsc
Apologies for not getting to this sooner.
The source package you uploaded does not have a ChangeLog file in it,
IIRC you were going to add that. I took
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 12:00 AM, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
I’ve patched the source quite a bit, and I believe I’ve addressed all of
your concerns. I’ve also improved integration with window managers by
setting the WM_CLASS, so that pagers and the like show “Rhinote” instead
of “Tk” now.
...
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 6:33 PM, Marco Balmer ma...@balmer.name wrote:
RFS: jabber-querybot [QA] -- Modular xmpp/jabber bot
This isn't a QA upload since the package is not orphaned.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 8:30 PM, Olе Streicher wrote:
I need create a package from a git repository (specifically
libraries/sla from http://starlink.jach.hawaii.edu/starlink.git).
What are the best options to do this?
One of the following in decreasing preference:
Ask upstream to perform
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 1:13 AM, Nikolai Lusan wrote:
Last year I packaged cluebringer (version 2.0 of policyd for doing
greylisting and other anti spam controls) as postfix-cluebringer. In my
initial packaging I used dbconfig-common to handle the database
installation and configuration,
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 9:48 AM, Toni Mueller wrote:
Of course I can. I have just forwarded you (Paul) the mail exchange
pertaining to that case that should shed some light on the initial
problems, but the gist of it is that I could not get the dbconfig-common
stuff to run reliably, while the
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 10:28 AM, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
I understand that it can take some time to get a package sponsored.
To say the least.
Nevertheless, when the involved package is orphaned,
it would be a good idea to change its status to reflect the fact
it is indeed orphaned, but also
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 8:45 PM, Gergely Nagy wrote:
Aha, I see. In this case... well, I don't think there's a solution
that's entirely satisfactory.
The closest thing I can think of, is that one is called libfooN, while
the other libfooN-nonfree, they conflict replace each other, and both
The --as-needed flag is a workaround for buggy upstream build systems,
IMO it should not be used unless the relevant build systems will not
be fixed any time soon.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 2:40 PM, Bartosz Feński wrote:
Reviewed and uploaded. Thanks for fixing all problems!
Here is my post-upload review for packages uploaded without any comment:
The patches seem to include copies of parts of debian/changelog, I
would suggest dropping those.
In the
I don't think that will work, since you need to be in a project to get
SSH access to alioth:
http://wiki.debian.org/Alioth/SSH#I.27m_unable_to_Connect_via_SSH.2C_...
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 12:00 PM, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
I would like to compress my .debian.tar tarballs with xz :
is there a way to set up that for debuild and pbuilder ?
There usually isn't any reason to do that since debian/ is usually
very small anyway.
If you really want to do that, the
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 1:45 AM, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote:
I should probably resign from Debian... but I don't feel ready for this.
Once it was not easy to become a DD. And I still hope for some changes
that will allow me to give more time to Debian. As for now, I hope my
@debian.org
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 9:01 AM, Paul Elliott wrote:
I have successfully uploaded to debian mentors, it has been more than 30 min.
package has not appeared on list, no email message about it of any kind.
From the logs it seems to have been rejected because it wasn't
directed at one of the
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 8:40 AM, David Roguin wrote:
I'm making some changes to the evolution package and every time I want
to test a tiny change I build a deb, install and run it. As you can
imagine that takes a lot of time.
That's why I'm asking if there's a faster way to iterate over
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 10:57 AM, David Roguin wrote:
Ok, but ./debian/rules binary takes a lot of time. Generating .deb
files for evolution takes a couple of minutes. It'd be great if I
could ./debian/rules build and run the whole thing from ./debian/tmp
(libs included)
Do you know any way
Here is another review of manaplus:
If you contact upstream as a result of this review, please point them
at these two pages:
http://wiki.debian.org/UpstreamGuide
http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Games/Upstream
Did you intend for this to be maintained as part of the Debian games team?
Do you
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 8:46 AM, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
Three days ago I uploaded for sponsoring my package with version
2.54+cvs20120219 which obviously cvs version.
You should have used 2.54~cvs20120219 instead, since that sorts before
2.54 (note the special ~ character).
Meanwhile, more
On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 9:02 AM, Paul Elliott wrote:
The new standard allows any all in the Architecture field.
Please explain this new feature. What does it do and under what circumstances
should it be used?
Please read the policy section that was changed (5.6.8):
See section 7.1 of debian-policy for examples on how to do that (you
probably want linux-any for the arch):
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
Uploaded.
There are some warnings from fontlint, run:
apt-get install fontforge-nox
find -iname *.ttf -o -iname *.otf -o -iname *.sfd -o -iname *.pfa -o
-iname *.pfb -o -iname *.bdf -o -iname *.pk -o -iname *.ttc -o -iname
*.pcf | xargs --no-run-if-empty fontlint
The one lintian complaint
In your situation I would ask upstream to remove those convenience copies.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 12:57 PM, Paul Elliott wrote:
The fact that a package is architecture independent is no guarantee that the
package will build under all architectures. The package can build depend on
packages that don't exist for some architectures.
But if the package once built under
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 3:36 AM, Paul Elliott wrote:
When that plan goes into place, will the Architecture: all be built under all
the different architectures? I have a package that fails to build under some
archetectures, because of the heavy duty dependancies necessary to build an
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 5:22 AM, Jakub Wilk wrote:
I have just unsubscribed from debian-mentors. In the unlikely event that I
started reviewing your package AND you feel I should be obliged to continue
the review, please Cc me.
I for one am sad to see you go :(
Good luck in whatever you are
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 4:15 AM, Fernando Lemos wrote:
[1]:
http://standards.freedesktop.org/icon-theme-spec/icon-theme-spec-latest.html
I think you want this spec instead since it specifies icon names:
http://standards.freedesktop.org/icon-naming-spec/icon-naming-spec-latest.html
If your
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 2:29 AM, Andreas Moog wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package trophy
Uploaded.
I note that clanlib FTBFS on Hurd due to PATH_MAX missing there. It
shouldn't be too hard to fix that.
BTW: the games team usually uses the wiki page instead:
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 6:31 PM, Vasudev Kamath wrote:
Just forwarding the RFS to here. I've kept the source of the package
in collab-maint as I'm more comfortable with git than svn. Please
review and let me know if any changes are required.
Please use X-Debbugs-CC next time.
--
bye,
pabs
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 1:46 AM, Fernando Lemos wrote:
That would be perfect. Any tips on how to get this started? Should
this be discussed in debian-devel, or perhaps debian-desktop?
The procedure is listed here:
http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/virtual-package-names-list.txt
Your
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 6:33 PM, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
What happened to this service?
I changed all my googlecode watch files to it and now it is broken:
$ dig A googlecode.debian.net +short
googlecode.debianit.it.
$ dig googlecode.debianit.it +short
$
There is no reason to use the
Here is an example:
version=3
http://code.google.com/p/bullet/downloads/list?can=1 \
.*/bullet-(\d[\d\.]+)\.(?:tgz|tbz|txz|(?:tar\.(?:gz|bz2|xz))|zip)
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 8:43 AM, andrei karas wrote:
Now i not sure. For me now task add manaplus to debian, after we will see.
Ok, I would encourage you to join the team and help out with other games too.
For now no, but in future yes.
Now server not in state for packaging, need many work
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 5:14 PM, Johannes Ring wrote:
One of my packages, syfi, has not migrated to testing, but I fail to
see why. According to the excuses page [1], it won't migrate because
Updating syfi introduces new bugs: #628243, but that bug was closed
a long time ago. The excuses page
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 7:42 AM, Nathan Owens wrote:
If I could vote, I would vote yes for this idea. It would probably make
adding new software to Debian faster/easier.
You can vote on that just like everyone else; with code:
http://alioth.debian.org/projects/debexpo/
The package FTBFS in a clean chroot:
make[2]: Entering directory `/tmp/buildd/z80dasm-1.1.3/test'
../src/z80dasm -at ./test.bin -o test.asm
Warning: Code might not be 8080 compatible!
z80asm test.asm -o test.bin-generated
make[2]: z80asm: Command not found
make[2]: *** [test.asm] Error 127
--
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 6:42 PM, Michael Wild wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package viennacl
The package has DMUA on it, you should not need a sponsor.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 8:38 PM, Michael Wild wrote:
Oops, that's my mistake. No idea how that crept in, I'm pretty certain I
don't have DMUA rights... Must have misunderstood the description of
that field when I first created the control file.
I will update the package at m.d.n ASAP.
Both
On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 8:46 AM, Yury Bulka wrote:
* Non-maintainer upload.
* New upstream release
* Fix lack of odt export styles (Closes: #655652)
These are not appropriate changes for an NMU:
http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/pkgs.html#nmu
--
bye,
pabs
Please refer to the diagrams on this wiki page and the relevant
sections of Debian policy:
http://wiki.debian.org/MaintainerScripts
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-binary.html#s-maintscripts
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-maintainerscripts.html
--
bye,
pabs
On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 9:53 PM, Innocent De Marchi wrote:
- Add en_US locale (closes a Ubuntu bug
#873958).
To close a Launchpad bug when the package reaches Ubuntu, you want this instead:
- Add en_US locale (LP: #873958).
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To
On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 9:53 PM, Innocent De Marchi wrote:
- Add en_US locale (closes a Ubuntu bug
#873958).
To close a Launchpad bug when the package reaches Ubuntu, you want this instead:
- Add en_US locale (LP: #873958).
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To
In general, we like it if upstreams follow our guide:
http://wiki.debian.org/UpstreamGuide
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 5:25 PM, Daniel Pocock wrote:
I am involved in several projects where I am either the founder of the
project (e.g. dynalogin) or a contributor with full access to the repository
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 4:29 PM, Vsevolod Velichko wrote:
This header makes me think about public domain or WTFPL. However it's
not strictly expressed, and neither me nor the upstream author (he's
not the author of that code) is sure, how to express the copyright
information in COPYING and
On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 1:44 PM, Vasudev Kamath wrote:
Friendica modifies the php library it is depending on heavily so it
ships the embedded php library source along with it. Also it
uses tinymce which is also highly modified version so If I symlink
debian's version of tinymce it will render
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 7:48 AM, Christopher Howard wrote:
Thank you everyone for the help. Hopefully I can get away with asking
two questions in one day: I was able to successfully package a game
inside a .deb; however, lintian is giving me the error:
The SGML/XML team are looking for a new maintainer for expat, if you
were willing to join the team you would probably find sponsors there:
http://bugs.debian.org/660681
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 8:14 AM, Christopher Howard wrote:
Hi. I have source code that comes with a freedesktop-style .desktop file
and svg icon. I know they need to go in /usr/share/applications and
/usr/share/pixmaps (respectively). In the deb package which I am making,
what should I put in
I would suggest working with BLT upstream to get version 3.0 released
so that you can depend on it. Please don't do embedded code copies or
static linking (which is almost as bad).
http://wiki.debian.org/EmbeddedCodeCopies
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
The FTP importer was stuck for some reason, I've restarted it, it is
back now and your package was imported:
http://mentors.debian.net/package/libreoffice-converter
Please consider using HTTP to upload since it results in immediate feedback.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 2:40 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
The first question is: Why does it not find a new version at all:
uscan relies solely on links and since there are no links to the
tarballs, it cannot find any tarballs.
you don't know a reasonable solution I might need to negotiate
with
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 12:35 PM, Silvio Cesare wrote:
The Debian Package clonewise-core (currently in the mentors archive)
http://mentors.debian.net/package/clonewise-core
http://www.foocodechu.com/downloads/clonewise
Here is a review of the package:
You should file an ITP bug:
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 5:53 PM, Mike Dupont wrote:
This is interesting. is this related
to http://www.fossology.org/projects/fossology fosology in any way?
Unrelated. IIRC Fossology is mainly about looking at copyright and
license information. Clonewise is for automatically detecting
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 5:26 AM, Martin Erik Werner wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my new package lierolibre
A review, since you are upstream too, I'm including some advice
related to that too.
I would suggest using git2cl or 'git log' upstream to create the ChangeLog file.
I note many
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 10:13 AM, Christopher Howard wrote:
* I make binary deb packages available for my projects from my Web site,
but I also wanted to make the deb source files available, so that people
can wrap their own binary debs for other architectures. I know that they
need the
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 7:50 AM, Martin Erik Werner wrote:
Via autoreconf you mean? I'll look into that.
Yep
Well the zlib is unused, (and now deleted). I was not aware of libpcl
and libtut, I'll have a look at ripping those out as well.
...
Hmm, I though I removed that since I found it
One more thing, the WM close button doesn't close the game (at least
in GNOME 3).
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
What would be the best practice to adopt the package in such case?
http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/beyond-pkging.html#mia-qa
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 11:40 AM, Ryan Tandy wrote:
To sum up: any system that has had version 3.4-1 of micro-evtd
installed is likely to contain a status file in /usr/sbin that dpkg
doesn't know about, and I'm not sure what the best way to resolve this
is.
Sounds like a serious bug.
The
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 9:41 PM, Olе Streicher wrote:
I am the maintainer of the package cpl. Upstream just released a new
version 6.0 and changed the SONAME for the built libraries from 12 to
20. So, the source now builds a package libcplcore20 instead of
libcplcore12. There are a few
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 4:34 AM, Mélodie wrote:
The link to a tarball containing the package inside a copy of the builddir:
http://meets.free.fr/debian/openbox-menu-deb-package.tar.bz2
Please link to the source package instead. You might also want to use
mentors.debian.net for uploading it,
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 8:48 AM, Vincent Cheng wrote:
I'm looking for a sponsor for my package logisim.
I don't intend to sponsor this but here is a review:
src/com/cburch/logisim/file/ReaderInputStream.java is Apache 2.0
licensed, not GPL. That isn't compatible with GPLv2 but since the rest
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 5:57 PM, Daniel Pocock wrote:
I notice that packages have not been taken from the queue for 3 weeks:
http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html
Freezes and NEW are mostly unrelated.
Is wheezy now frozen already?
No
Are people just wasting their time preparing
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 6:33 PM, Daniel Pocock wrote:
Can you elaborate on that a little? The link you provided below doesn't
explain the status of NEW - but Google found various things suggesting
that Debian stopped accepting new packages before squeeze was released.
NEW is not managed by
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 5:57 PM, Daniel Pocock wrote:
Is wheezy now frozen already? Are people just wasting their time
preparing packages that are going to be passed over?
FYI the release team just narrowed the freeze date to the second half of June:
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 1:24 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
Calling it +ds doesn't express anything.
+ds stands for Debian Source and is commonly used when dropping say
vast quantities of embedded code copies from upstream tarballs.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 7:58 AM, KURASHIKI Satoru wrote:
I want to adopt this package because I'm planning to ITP
the package (rt-extension-calendar) which depends on this
library.
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=653301
I'm unsure that this RM means we remove this from
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 5:57 AM, Bas van den Dikkenberg wrote:
Is it posebol to specify a depency voor a specific architechture ?
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#s-depsyntax
For example I want voor hppa and powerpcspe that debhelper (= 9.20120513) is
and all
My preference is for a plain mailing list, at least until debbugs
#645974/#485697 is fixed to unbreak threading.
Back to the topic, I don't mind either way since I mostly ignore
debian-mentors these days.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 4:27 PM, Gerber van der Graaf wrote:
As I will have to remove an entire directory, containing a module, its
parent directory contains a CMakeLists.txt file containing
'add_subdirectory(subdir_containing_non_free_files)'
My question is: do I have to provide a patch in
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 11:42 AM, David Lindelöf wrote:
I'm trying to build my first cross-distribution package, but I run
into the following problem.
The source of my project includes symbolic links to other source trees
(notably, the CppUTest framework and a library used by several of our
Thanks, I see what you are doing now.
Looks like you instead should build-dep on libcpputest-dev and use
#include CppUTest/Utest.h and -llibCppUTest to build against it.
Weird that it only provides static libraries though :/
Tarballs should be built by the upstream build system (`make
distcheck`
701 - 800 of 2536 matches
Mail list logo
