Packaging debian-obly package (no upstream)

2012-08-01 Thread Tomasz Buchert
Hello mentors, I am working on one bug of mine (http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=664457) and I've noticed that, technically, my new package will have no upstream. What is the packaging workflow in this case? All tutorials/manuals I've read assume that you work with upstream tarball

Re: Packaging debian-obly package (no upstream)

2012-08-01 Thread Tomasz Buchert
Le 01/08/2012 18:48, Bart Martens a écrit : On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 11:24:20AM +0200, Tomasz Buchert wrote: Hello mentors, I am working on one bug of mine (http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=664457) and I've noticed that, technically, my new package will have no upstream

Re: Packaging debian-obly package (no upstream)

2012-08-02 Thread Tomasz Buchert
Le 01/08/2012 20:01, Bart Martens a écrit : On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 07:48:01PM +0200, Tomasz Buchert wrote: Le 01/08/2012 18:48, Bart Martens a écrit : On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 11:24:20AM +0200, Tomasz Buchert wrote: Hello mentors, I am working on one bug of mine (http://bugs.debian.org/cgi

Sponsor for miredo 1.2.6-1 (which is ITA)

2013-07-30 Thread Tomasz Buchert
Hi Mentors, would somebody be able to sponsor an upload of my work on miredo to Debian? I'm already a Debian maintainer and I intend to adopt miredo as well. I did some work on miredo, more details here: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=713005 The result of my work is here:

Re: Sponsor for miredo 1.2.6-1 (which is ITA)

2013-07-30 Thread Tomasz Buchert
. - Bug #661983 workaround (again) entry is irrelevant. CDBS is not used any more. - #635749 has a patch. Consider applying it. - Try to fix pedantic and info-warnings of lintian. - Use -parallel option in dh. Cheers, Anton 2013/7/30 Tomasz Buchert tomasz.buch...@inria.fr: Hi

Re: Sponsor for miredo 1.2.6-1 (which is ITA)

2013-07-30 Thread Tomasz Buchert
it, as it was he who was involved in the original bug. Anton - thanks for you help and great review of the package. Cheers, Tomasz On 30/07/13 20:35, Axel Beckert wrote: Hi Tomasz, On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 07:57:01PM +0200, Tomasz Buchert wrote: you want to take a look at this: :D https

Two packages interdependency issue

2013-08-24 Thread Tomasz Buchert
with stellarium-stars-4.0 and requires, say, a version 5.0 of stars. How can I model this using package relationships? The closest one I see is Conflicts: stellarium-stars (= 4.0) in stellarium's 2.0 control file. Is there a better way? Cheers, Tomasz Buchert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian

Re: Gitorious and debian/watch file

2013-11-24 Thread Tomasz Buchert
Hi guys, any news for this problem with gitorious? Cheers, Tomasz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20131124170910.ga6...@piscopia.math

Re: Gitorious and debian/watch file

2013-11-25 Thread Tomasz Buchert
On 24/11/13 20:39, Mateusz Łukasik wrote: W dniu 24.11.2013 o 18:09 Tomasz Buchert tomasz.buch...@inria.fr pisze: Hi guys, any news for this problem with gitorious? Cheers, Tomasz Here is solution: https://wiki.debian.org/debian/watch/ Hi Mateusz, the whole point

miredo / upload or DM rights

2013-12-27 Thread Tomasz Buchert
Hi, I'm a de facto maintainer of miredo¹. I want to release a new version, however I'm not a DM so I can't do it myself. For that reason I'm looking for a sponsor to upload it, or, to make things easier, someone who would grant me DM rights. The new release is uploaded to mentors². Cheers,

Re: miredo / upload or DM rights

2013-12-27 Thread Tomasz Buchert
Hi, thanks! That will make the things easier. :) Tomasz On 27/12/13 15:13, Anton Gladky wrote: Hi Tomasz, It seems, your commits to miredo-VCS are OK. Thus I granted you permissions to upload miredo. Thanks for contribution, Anton 2013/12/27 Tomasz Buchert tomasz.buch

Bug#733578: hwinfo/21.0-1 needs updates / FTBFS of libx86emu

2014-02-01 Thread Tomasz Buchert
On 29/01/14 02:34, Sebastien Badia wrote: On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 02:46:33AM (+0100), Johann Felix Soden wrote: Hi Sebastien, hi Tomasz, I have not yet completely reviewed hwinfo 21.0-1, but there is at least one thing which needs to be fixed: Hi Johann, Hi Seb, Hi Johann,

Bug#733578: hwinfo/21.0-1 needs updates / FTBFS of libx86emu

2014-02-03 Thread Tomasz Buchert
Hi all, [...] Hum, and it's not a missing dependency to libc6-dev ? (I'm maybe wrong) Yeah, seems to me as well. I'll try to test it out. We were both wrong - sys/io.h does not exist on the architectures in question, for example:

Rules for packaging forked software

2014-02-07 Thread Tomasz Buchert
Hi, tl;dr = What is the Debian Policy about packaging forked software? I couldn't find this problem discussed in Debian Policy nor with Google-helped search in mailing lists. If I missed something obvious or I'm posting to a wrong list, please let me know as bluntly as you wish. Recently,

Bug#742330: RFS: gravit/0.5.1-1 ITP -- visually stunning gravity simulator

2014-03-22 Thread Tomasz Buchert
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package gravit: * Package name: gravit Version : 0.5.1-1 Upstream Author : Gerald Kaszuba * URL : http://gravit.slowchop.com/ * License : GPL2 Section

Bug#742330: [supp...@mentors.debian.net: gravit uploaded to mentors.debian.net]

2014-03-22 Thread Tomasz Buchert
Here it is: - Forwarded message from mentors.debian.net supp...@mentors.debian.net - Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2014 14:54:36 + (UTC) From: mentors.debian.net supp...@mentors.debian.net To: tomasz.buch...@inria.fr Subject: gravit uploaded to mentors.debian.net Hi. Your upload of the

Bug#742330: git repository

2014-03-22 Thread Tomasz Buchert
Hi, one more thing; the git repository with the package is here: http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/gravit.git Tomasz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive:

Bug#744044: RFS: stellarium-stars/1.4.0 -- stellarium star catalogues

2014-04-09 Thread Tomasz Buchert
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package stellarium-stars * Package name: stellarium-stars Version : 1.4.0 Upstream Author : Tomasz Buchert tomasz.buch...@inria.fr * URL : http

Bug#753587: RFS: verbiste-mate-applet/0.1.41-2 -- verbiste MATE panel

2014-07-03 Thread Tomasz Buchert
: This package contains a MATE panel applet. To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/verbiste and http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/verbiste.git Regards, Tomasz Buchert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE

Bug#754962: RFS: tiptop/2.2 [ITP] -- performance monitoring for Linux via hardware counters

2014-07-16 Thread Tomasz Buchert
-x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/tiptop/tiptop_2.2-1.dsc The relevant bugs are: * http://bugs.debian.org/754932 (RFP) * http://bugs.debian.org/754947 (ITP) More information about hello can be obtained from http://tiptop.gforge.inria.fr/. Regards, Tomasz Buchert

Bug#754962: More info

2014-07-16 Thread Tomasz Buchert
Also collab-maint repo: http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/tiptop.git Tomasz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive:

Bug#754962: RFS: tiptop/2.2 [ITP] -- performance monitoring tool for Linux

2014-07-23 Thread Tomasz Buchert
On 18/07/14 15:38, Vincent Legout wrote: Hi Tomasz, Hi Vincent, how sponsors are able to spot all these things, amazes me. :) Tomasz Buchert tomasz.buch...@inria.fr writes: I am looking for a sponsor for my package tiptop: I'm interested in sponsoring tiptop, I just have some comments

Bug#742330: RFS: gravit/0.5.1-1 ITP -- visually stunning gravity simulator

2014-07-26 Thread Tomasz Buchert
On 16/04/14 10:58, Thibaut Paumard wrote: Control: owner -1 ! Control: tag -1 + pending Dear Tomasz, Hi Thibaut, I didn't miss your review - I didn't have time to work on it properly :). debian/copyright is incomplete. Use licensecheck, grep and less to find out the copyright and

Re: How to resolve circular build dependency?

2014-09-13 Thread Tomasz Buchert
On 13/09/14 15:01, Ole Streicher wrote: Dear mentors, in debian-astro, we have a problem with a circular dependency on two packages that are currently prepared [1], [2]: - the casacore needs the casacore-data package for unit tests - the casacore-data needs casacore to be build from the

Bug#742330: RFS: gravit/0.5.1-1 ITP -- visually stunning gravity simulator

2014-09-22 Thread Tomasz Buchert
Hi Thibaut, I' taking liberty to ping you about this RFS. Cheers, Tomasz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140922182944.ga8...@buchert.pl

Bug#742330: RFS: gravit/0.5.1-1 ITP -- visually stunning gravity simulator

2014-09-25 Thread Tomasz Buchert
On 24/09/14 17:29, Thibaut Paumard wrote: Le 24/09/2014 17:05, Thibaut Paumard a écrit : I'm building the package now, will let you know if there are other problems While you're at it, there's a new version of Policy, you should update Standards-Version:

Bug#742330: RFS: gravit/0.5.1-1 ITP -- visually stunning gravity simulator

2014-09-30 Thread Tomasz Buchert
On 25/09/14 17:27, Thibaut Paumard wrote: Le 25/09/2014 09:15, Tomasz Buchert a écrit : Hi Thibaut, I corrected these problems: http://mentors.debian.net/package/gravit (changes: http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/debian-astro/packages/gravit.git/) I also added cc-by-sa-3.0.txt to gravit

Mininet packaging for jessie

2014-10-20 Thread Tomasz Buchert
Hi all, me and Darek work on packaging of mininet [1,2] for jessie. Unfortunately, although the package is kind-of ready, we have problems: (1) the last release cannot be used in jessie as-it-is, because its dependency is not available (see [3]) (2) the development version of mininet

Bug#768487: RFS: fasm/1.71.22 -- fast assembler for the x86 and x86-64 architectures

2014-11-07 Thread Tomasz Buchert
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package fasm: * Package name: fasm Version : 1.71.22-1 Upstream Author : Tomasz Grysztar * URL : http://flatassembler.net * License : FASM license

Bug#775194: RFS: mininet/2.2.0 ITP - process-based network emulator

2015-01-17 Thread Tomasz Buchert
On 17/01/15 22:02, Vincent Bernat wrote: ❦ 12 janvier 2015 16:59 +0100, Vincent Bernat ber...@debian.org : I have not tested the result, but the package looks good otherwise. I've just reuploaded the package to mentors. It should be visible in few minutes. I'll try the package

Bug#775194: RFS: mininet/2.2.0 ITP - process-based network emulator

2015-01-17 Thread Tomasz Buchert
On 17/01/15 22:33, Vincent Bernat wrote: ❦ 17 janvier 2015 22:17 +0100, Tomasz Buchert tomasz.buch...@inria.fr : I am fine with the package as is. What do you think about what I said about debian/copyright and the MIT/Expat license? my only concern is that the text of the license

Bug#775194: RFS: mininet/2.2.0 ITP - process-based network emulator

2015-01-12 Thread Tomasz Buchert
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package mininet: * Package name: mininet Version : 2.2.0 Upstream Author : Bob Lantz et al. * URL : http://mininet.org/ * License : BSD-like

Bug#775194: RFS: mininet/2.2.0 ITP - process-based network emulator

2015-01-12 Thread Tomasz Buchert
On 12/01/15 15:03, Vincent Bernat wrote: ❦ 12 janvier 2015 14:30 +0100, Tomasz Buchert tomasz.buch...@inria.fr : It builds those binary packages: mininet - process-based network emulator To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL

Re: Bug#788844: RFS: gbutils/5.6.6-1 [ITP]

2015-06-30 Thread Tomasz Buchert
On 30/06/15 12:35, Pietro Battiston wrote: Dear mentors, I am again asking for a sponsor for the package gbutils - see description below. I tried to ask on the Debian science mailing list, but without success. I will be happy to provide any further info about the software/package. Thanks

Bug#793331: RFS: postsrsd/1.2-1 [ITP]

2015-08-17 Thread Tomasz Buchert
On 17/08/15 21:53, Oxan van Leeuwen wrote: Hi, On 15-08-15 12:21, Tomasz Buchert wrote: I've tested the AppArmor profile too, it looks fine, although I'm not sure if 'm' is needed in the profile for '/usr/sbin/postsrsd', since it seems to work just fine without it. I've a rather basic

Bug#793331: RFS: postsrsd/1.2-1 [ITP]

2015-08-20 Thread Tomasz Buchert
On 20/08/15 13:24, Oxan van Leeuwen wrote: Hi, Hi, On 18-08-15 01:01, Tomasz Buchert wrote: great! Just nit-picking here, really. And trying to understand AppArmor :). You seem to be right, I've committed a patch to remove the m flag. Ok. Yes, I tried without postconf present

Bug#793331: RFS: postsrsd/1.2-1 [ITP]

2015-08-15 Thread Tomasz Buchert
On 24/07/15 15:49, Oxan van Leeuwen wrote: Hi, On 24-07-15 02:43, Cameron Norman wrote: I see the prerm file is empty -- why not just delete it? Oops, that's a leftover from the switch to dh_apparmor. I've deleted it in the git repository. Also, why do you patch the sysv-redhat init script

Bug#793331: RFS: postsrsd/1.2-1 [ITP]

2015-07-23 Thread Tomasz Buchert
Hi Oxan, still looking for a sponsor? I've just wanted to implement SRS on my mail server! Tomasz signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Bug#788844: RFS: gbutils/5.6.6-1 [ITP]

2015-07-19 Thread Tomasz Buchert
On 15/07/15 15:11, Pietro Battiston wrote: Il giorno dom, 12/07/2015 alle 20.38 +0200, Tomasz Buchert ha scritto: On 11/07/15 00:37, Pietro Battiston wrote: Hi Tomasz, thank you very much for your careful review. Il giorno mar, 30/06/2015 alle 13.58 +0200, Tomasz Buchert ha

Bug#793331: RFS: postsrsd/1.2-1 [ITP]

2015-08-24 Thread Tomasz Buchert
On 22/08/15 15:06, Oxan van Leeuwen wrote: Hi, On 21-08-15 00:19, Tomasz Buchert wrote: I think that we either: * need hard dependency on postfix * need to have a debconf dialog that goes more or less like that: - if postconf exists, the domain is taken from

Bug#793331: RFS: postsrsd/1.2-1 [ITP]

2015-08-25 Thread Tomasz Buchert
On 25/08/15 17:59, Oxan van Leeuwen wrote: On 25-08-15 09:09, Tomasz Buchert wrote: Hi, do you understand this lintian warning about incomplete translation? It complains about the templates file, it looks strange to me. I believe it complains that there are no translations for the debconf

Bug#793331: RFS: postsrsd/1.2-1 [ITP]

2015-08-25 Thread Tomasz Buchert
On 25/08/15 17:59, Oxan van Leeuwen wrote: On 25-08-15 09:09, Tomasz Buchert wrote: Hi, do you understand this lintian warning about incomplete translation? It complains about the templates file, it looks strange to me. I believe it complains that there are no translations for the debconf

Re: Help needed: Bug#802354: python-matplotlib-venn: FTBFS: AttributeError: can't set attribute

2015-10-22 Thread Tomasz Buchert
ucket.org/pypa/setuptools/commits/cf565b66b855dd4df189b679206f9fb113681737 From: Tomasz Buchert <tom...@buchert.pl> Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2015 01:37:33 +0200 Subject: test --- setup.py | 4 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/setup.py b/setup.py index 2e57cf8..8d04c3a 100644 --- a/setup.py

Re: Package upload successful but not processed

2015-10-25 Thread Tomasz Buchert
On 25/10/15 17:28, Andreas Moog wrote: > Hello there, > > I am a Debian Maintainer and wanted to upload a new release of a package I > have upload rights to. The upload seemed successful: > > "nzbget_16.0+dfsg-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost" > > but I didn't receive a second

Re: Setting up CI environment

2015-10-21 Thread Tomasz Buchert
On 21/10/15 10:34, Ole Streicher wrote: > Hi, > > I was just trying to setup the debci environment, following the > documentation > > https://ci.debian.net/doc/ > > However, when I run the command > > $ adt-run --user debci --output-dir /tmp/debci-output \ >

Re: Bug#788844: RFS: gbutils/5.6.6-1 [ITP]

2015-07-12 Thread Tomasz Buchert
On 11/07/15 00:37, Pietro Battiston wrote: Hi Tomasz, thank you very much for your careful review. Il giorno mar, 30/06/2015 alle 13.58 +0200, Tomasz Buchert ha scritto: On 30/06/15 12:35, Pietro Battiston wrote: [...] Hi, here are a few notes: * you install manpages 2

Re: Bug#788844: RFS: gbutils/5.6.6-1 [ITP]

2015-07-12 Thread Tomasz Buchert
One more thing: | Optional dependencies: | | Gnu Scientific Library (GSL)found | GNU matheval librarynot found | zlib general purpose compression libraryfound | help2man automatic man pages generator found Is matheval uninstalled

Bug#793331: RFS: postsrsd/1.2-1 [ITP]

2015-08-25 Thread Tomasz Buchert
On 25/08/15 00:19, Oxan van Leeuwen wrote: Hi Thomas, On 24-08-15 14:10, Tomasz Buchert wrote: Nicely done, but there is one issue. If you modify conffiles in postinst it marks them as changed, and this is not something you want to do. In my branch tomasz-changes I followed ADVANCED

Re: Any reason to keep libsdsl in experimental (Was: Please help creating shared *and* static library with cmake)

2016-04-09 Thread Tomasz Buchert
On 08/04/16 19:24, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 06:16:51PM +0100, Sascha Steinbiss wrote: > > For the record, I seem to remember there is already a libsdsl package in > > experimental: > > https://packages.qa.debian.org/libs/libsdsl.html > > Ahhh, very helpful hint!! > >

Re: Any reason to keep libsdsl in experimental (Was: Please help creating shared *and* static library with cmake)

2016-04-10 Thread Tomasz Buchert
On 09/04/16 18:31, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Tomasz, > > On Sat, Apr 09, 2016 at 04:47:35PM +0200, Tomasz Buchert wrote: > > > > the only reason is that it doesn't build on most architectures. The > > upstream devel version build, I think, on other archs, but it h

Re: Any reason to keep libsdsl in experimental (Was: Please help creating shared *and* static library with cmake)

2016-04-10 Thread Tomasz Buchert
On 10/04/16 18:53, Adam Borowski wrote: > On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 05:52:29PM +0200, Tomasz Buchert wrote: > > On 09/04/16 18:31, Andreas Tille wrote: > > > On Sat, Apr 09, 2016 at 04:47:35PM +0200, Tomasz Buchert wrote: > > > > the only reason is that it doesn

Request to upload postsrsd

2020-12-17 Thread Tomasz Buchert
Hey mentors, I'm looking for a sponsor for the upload of postsrsd. As some of you know, I'm a DD myself, but my key expired in debian-keyring and I cannot get my uploads accepted. My updated key is already uploaded to debian-keyring, but it hasn't reached the distribution yet. You can fetch my

Re: Request to upload postsrsd

2020-12-17 Thread Tomasz Buchert
On 17/12/20 12:20, Tomasz Buchert wrote: > Hey mentors, > > I'm looking for a sponsor for the upload of postsrsd. As some of you > know, I'm a DD myself, but my key expired in debian-keyring and I > cannot get my uploads accepted. My updated key is already uploaded to &