Hi Alexandru,
I haven't reviewed your package, however:
On Sun, 2024-04-21 at 19:42 +0300, Alexandru Mihail wrote:
> Thanks a lot and have a nice day,
> Alexandru Mihail
> mini-httpd maintainer
It looks like you've been maintaining this package for a while now.
Have you considered applying
On Thu, 2024-02-15 at 16:20 -0800, Loren M. Lang wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I recently had a package sponsors and entered into unstable called tiv.
> It can be seen here:
>
> https://packages.debian.org/sid/tiv
>
> Everything went OK, but I see that the amd64 arch package appears to
> have been
On Tue, 2023-11-07 at 02:02 +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
> Hi.
>
> A similar bug which was fixed in a similar way:
>
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1052859#40
>
> See what Aurelien Jarno (glibc maintainer) said:
> > I have seen that in the meantime you have done a new upload
Hi all,
I'm working on fixing bug #1052803 for golang-github-gosexy-gettext.
That package's tests started failing, and I'm pretty sure it was caused
by the upload of src:glibc 2.37-8 which backported a patch from bug
#874160 that treats language encodings like C.UTF-8 as the C locale.
This
Hi Matthias,
On Tue, 2022-09-13 at 06:12 +0200, matthias.geiger1...@tutanota.de
wrote:
Hi Mathias,
thanks for reaching out and taking the time for a review. I fixed
> all the improvements you mentioned and uploaded the new (old)
> version to mentors.
That's looking better. However, the Vcs-
Hi,
You should have seen pretty clearly when uploading your package to
mentors.debian.net that another individual was already working on it.
Have you coordinated your work with him? If so, why have you opened a
duplicate RFS for this package, when one already exists (#1013293)? If
not, that's a
Hi Matthias,
As part of my Debian Developer application, I reviewed your package
"neo-cli" as posted on mentors.debian.net. I found a few issues that
should be addressed before this package could be uploaded. While I'm
not yet a DD, if you fix the following issues and no one else sponsors
this
Hi Ben,
I spent some time reviewing the packaging for makemkv-{bin,oss}
today. Here are some thoughts/comments.
General notes:
* The typical pattern for new source packages in Debian is to have an
ITP filed, which is then closed on the first upload. Right now you have
an ITP that's
On Tue, 2022-01-18 at 18:31 -0500, Ben Westover wrote:
> Hello again, I've fixed some problems.
>
> > It dawned on me last night that maybe a simple use of
> > dh_install(1)'s
> > d/*.install file may be sufficient when coupled with a stub
> > d/rules.
> > Compat level 13 and later support
On Mon, 2022-01-17 at 14:51 -0500, Ben Westover wrote:
> Hello, Mathias!
>
> > It looks like you're basing your packaging work off of the
> > packages
> > I've created and made available; that's wonderful, and I'm glad
> > they
> > were a good starting point. However, I think it would be
> >
Hi Ben!
On Sun, 2022-01-16 at 20:51 -0500, Ben Westover wrote:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my packages "makemkv-oss" and
> "makemkv-bin" (they depend on each other):
It's great that you're working on the packaging
On Thu, 2021-03-25 at 09:12 +0200, Andrius Merkys wrote:
> On 2021-03-25 03:07, Mathias Gibbens wrote:
> > On Wed, 2021-03-24 at 07:58 +0200, Andrius Merkys wrote:
> > > 3. Upstream copyright entry in debian/copyright lacks years. If
> > > the
> > > upstream d
On Wed, 2021-03-24 at 07:58 +0200, Andrius Merkys wrote:
> owner 979592 !
> owner 985806 !
> owner 985807 !
> thanks
>
> Hi Mathias,
>
> On 2021-03-24 03:47, Mathias Gibbens wrote:
> > retitle 979592 RFS: openrct2/0.3.3+ds-1 [ITP] -- Open-source re-
> > impl
retitle 979592 RFS: openrct2/0.3.3+ds-1 [ITP] -- Open-source re-implementation
of RollerCoaster Tycoon 2
thanks
I have uploaded a revised version of openrct2 to mentors.d.n:
dget -x
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/contrib/o/openrct2/openrct2_0.3.3+ds-1.dsc
Packaging changes
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "openrct2-title-sequences":
* Package name: openrct2-title-sequences
Version : 0.1.2c-1
Upstream Author : https://github.com/OpenRCT2/title-sequences
* URL :
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "openrct2-objects":
* Package name: openrct2-objects
Version : 1.0.21+dfsg-1
Upstream Author : https://github.com/OpenRCT2/objects
* URL :
On Tue, 2021-03-16 at 12:57 +0200, Andrius Merkys wrote:
> Hi Mathias,
>
> On 2021-03-15 19:28, Mathias Gibbens wrote:
> > > I have reviewed your packaging, and saw libcurl4-openssl-dev
> > > among
> > > the build dependencies. Do you know what does openrct2
Hi Andrius,
Thanks for your feedback! To answer your questions:
> I have reviewed your packaging, and saw libcurl4-openssl-dev among
> the build dependencies. Do you know what does openrct2 need it for?
> My concern here is that in-game network access/downloads may
> interfere with Debian
retitle 979592 RFS: openrct2/0.3.3+dfsg-1 [ITP] -- Open-source
re-implementation of RollerCoaster Tycoon 2
thanks
Upstream released v0.3.3 earlier today, and I have updated my
packaging accordingly. Additionally, I updated the distribution to
experimental, as the bullseye freeze is in full
I have heard back from upstream regarding licensing for the remaining
game assets and have updated the packaging appropriately.
The package "openrct2" is now fully ready for review. As normal,
further information about this package can be found at
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "openrct2":
* Package name: openrct2
Version : 0.3.2+ds-1
Upstream Author : https://github.com/OpenRCT2/OpenRCT2
* URL : https://openrct2.io/
* License
21 matches
Mail list logo
