Bug#373885: Fix

2006-06-18 Thread Ken Bloom
rosegarden-data should Conflicts: rosegarden4 -- I usually have a GPG digital signature included as an attachment. See http://www.gnupg.org/ for info about these digital signatures. signature.asc Description: Digital signature

we got our first bugs filed against rosegarden

2006-06-18 Thread Mike O'Connor
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=373885 I just checked in a new control file that declares Conflicts: against the older rosegarden2,4 packages to try to fix this bug. Hopefully later today I'll get time to start going through all the old bugs and either close the obviously outdate

Re: om_0.2.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2006-06-18 Thread Joost Yervante Damad
On Sunday 18 June 2006 10:47, Joerg Jaspert wrote: > Hi Maintainer, > > rejected - i cant find ladspa-vcf, ladspa-omins as packages in the archive, > but you depend on them. Maybe I just miss it, so if its there point me at > it. I guess these packages need an upload first :( > Additionally your

om_0.2.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2006-06-18 Thread Joerg Jaspert
Hi Maintainer, rejected - i cant find ladspa-vcf, ladspa-omins as packages in the archive, but you depend on them. Maybe I just miss it, so if its there point me at it. Additionally your debian/copyright is wrong, there is no om-synth-patches package, -- bye Joerg === If you don't understa