Re: Ardour still not present in testing

2008-05-02 Thread Paul Davis
On Fri, 2008-05-02 at 10:22 +0100, Daniel James wrote: > Hi Paul W, > > > someone needs to get in contact with upstream and educate them about > > the evilness of embedded code copies. > > I don't think that's a very helpful approach. The Ardour team are > already aware of Debian's reservations

Re: Ardour still not present in testing

2008-05-02 Thread Daniel James
Hi Paul W, Does anyone know if the below stuff are external libraries? I know that clearlooks is a gtk theme and libsndfile is an external library, but I'm not sure about the rest. libraries['vamp'] = LibraryInfo (LIBS='vampsdk', LIBPATH='#libs/vamp-sdk',

Re: Ardour still not present in testing

2008-05-02 Thread Daniel James
Hi Paul W, someone needs to get in contact with upstream and educate them about the evilness of embedded code copies. I don't think that's a very helpful approach. The Ardour team are already aware of Debian's reservations about the embedded libraries. Consider that the Ardour team do not w

Re: Ardour still not present in testing

2008-05-02 Thread Daniel James
Hi Paul, Security isn't the only reason embedded libraries are bad. On the other hand, what about the right of an upstream development team to specify the versions of libraries which they require, patching them as necessary? Even with libraries built in, the Ardour package is still smaller

Re: Ardour still not present in testing

2008-05-02 Thread Paul Wise
On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 12:21 PM, Paul Wise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm going to have a go at killing all these libraries right now, but > someone needs to get in contact with upstream and educate them about > the evilness of embedded code copies. I thought this would be as simple as turnin