El 26/11/08 12:27 Felipe Sateler escribió:
> OK, so I'm about to co-maintain liblo, which is an OSC library, and can be
> considered a multimedia package (csound, rosegarden and ardour are some
> "big" packages using it).
> So... I want to bring it under the scope of the teams-to-become-one. I have
El 17/12/08 16:29 Reinhard Tartler escribió:
> * pkg-multimedia gets an git repository (Felipe, please request one and
>start moving the packages. btw, is it possible to redirect the old
>locations to the new ones? - I don't think so, but you never know)
I requested a git repository. I do
Hi,
|--==> On Tue, 16 Dec 2008 21:13:57 -0500, The Anarcat
said:
TA> Package: ardour
TA> Followup-For: Bug #446405
TA> what's the status on the libsndfile upstream release here?
TA> it seems like sid has the latest libsndfile, is that okay now with
TA> Ardour?
Yes, I think it would
[Sending to both lists, as I'm not sure which is the relevant one.
Please CC me replies as I'm not subscribed on either list]
This message is regarding post-Lenny issues.
libresample is a library audacity uses internally (lib-src/libresample/).
It is also availble as an independent tarball from
Felipe Sateler writes:
> El 26/11/08 12:27 Felipe Sateler escribió:
>> OK, so I'm about to co-maintain liblo, which is an OSC library, and can be
>> considered a multimedia package (csound, rosegarden and ardour are some
>> "big" packages using it).
>> So... I want to bring it under the scope of
Hi,
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 02:15:59PM +0200, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> If anybody wants I have a proprly automake/libtoolized version of that
> instead of that hacked Makefile.
Moving the library to a standalone package is probably a good idea if these
versions do not diverge too much.
Whether it
ardour_2.7.1-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
ardour_2.7.1-1.dsc
ardour_2.7.1.orig.tar.gz
ardour_2.7.1-1.diff.gz
ardour_2.7.1-1_amd64.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-multimedia-requ...@lists.debi
Accepted:
ardour_2.7.1-1.diff.gz
to pool/main/a/ardour/ardour_2.7.1-1.diff.gz
ardour_2.7.1-1.dsc
to pool/main/a/ardour/ardour_2.7.1-1.dsc
ardour_2.7.1-1_amd64.deb
to pool/main/a/ardour/ardour_2.7.1-1_amd64.deb
ardour_2.7.1.orig.tar.gz
to pool/main/a/ardour/ardour_2.7.1.orig.tar.gz
Overri
Your message dated Wed, 17 Dec 2008 22:32:16 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#446405: fixed in ardour 1:2.7.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #446405,
regarding ardour: Embeds too many libs
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Your message dated Wed, 17 Dec 2008 22:32:16 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#508970: fixed in ardour 1:2.7.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #508970,
regarding ardour: new upstream version available (2.7.1)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been d
Hi Reinhard,
|--==> On Wed, 17 Dec 2008 20:29:52 +0100, Reinhard Tartler
said:
RT> Felipe Sateler writes:
>>El 26/11/08 12:27 Felipe Sateler escribió:
>>>OK, so I'm about to co-maintain liblo, which is an OSC library, and can be
>>>considered a multimedia package (csound, rosegarden an
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> package ardour
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: ardour
> found 446405 1:2.7.1-1
Bug#446405: ardour: Embeds too many libs
Bug marked as found in version 1:2.7.1-1 and reopened.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assis
package ardour
found 446405 1:2.7.1-1
thanks
This upload doesn't actually fix this, there is a typo in debian/rules:
diff --git a/debian/rules b/debian/rules
index c57613c..b20eafa 100755
--- a/debian/rules
+++ b/debian/rules
@@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ DEB_SCONS_EXTRA_FLAGS := \
NLS=yes \
F
13 matches
Mail list logo
