Bug#996856: marked as done (libcamera: Update package to a more recent version)

2023-02-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 4 Feb 2023 14:06:01 +0100 with message-id and subject line libcamera: Update package to a more recent version has caused the Debian Bug report #996856, regarding libcamera: Update package to a more recent version to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the pr

Bug#1029397: marked as done (libde265: CVE-2020-21596)

2023-02-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 04 Feb 2023 17:08:34 +0100 with message-id <53502a5106f68f8429574793e44711cdbe30d423.ca...@sviech.de> and subject line Re: libde265: CVE-2020-21594 CVE-2020-21595 CVE-2020-21596 CVE-2020-21597 CVE-2020-21599 CVE-2020-21601 CVE-2020-21603 CVE-2020-21604 CVE-2020-21605 CVE-2

Bug#1029357: marked as done (libde265: CVE-2022-43245 CVE-2022-43249)

2023-02-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 04 Feb 2023 17:09:41 +0100 with message-id and subject line Re: libde265: CVE-2022-43245 CVE-2022-43249 has caused the Debian Bug report #1029357, regarding libde265: CVE-2022-43245 CVE-2022-43249 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been de

Processed: fixed 1029397 in 1.0.2-2+deb9u2, fixed 1029397 in 1.0.3-1+deb10u3, fixed 1029397 in 1.0.11-1

2023-02-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > fixed 1029397 1.0.2-2+deb9u2 Bug #1029397 {Done: Tobias Frost } [src:libde265] libde265: CVE-2020-21596 The source 'libde265' and version '1.0.2-2+deb9u2' do not appear to match any binary packages Marked as fixed in versions libde265/1.0.2-2+de

Processed: fixed 1029357 in 1.0.11-1

2023-02-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > fixed 1029357 1.0.11-1 Bug #1029357 {Done: Tobias Frost } [src:libde265] libde265: CVE-2022-43245 CVE-2022-43249 Marked as fixed in versions libde265/1.0.11-1. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1029

Processed: fixed 1027179 in 1.0.2-2+deb9u2, fixed 1027179 in 1.0.3-1+deb10u3

2023-02-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > fixed 1027179 1.0.2-2+deb9u2 Bug #1027179 {Done: Tobias Frost } [src:libde265] libde265: CVE-2022-43235 CVE-2022-43236 CVE-2022-43237 CVE-2022-43238 CVE-2022-43239 CVE-2022-43240 CVE-2022-43241 CVE-2022-43242 CVE-2022-43244 CVE-2022-43250 CVE-2

Processed: fixed 1025816 in 1.0.2-2+deb9u2, fixed 1025816 in 1.0.3-1+deb10u3

2023-02-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > fixed 1025816 1.0.2-2+deb9u2 Bug #1025816 {Done: Tobias Frost } [src:libde265] libde265: CVE-2022-43243 CVE-2022-43248 CVE-2022-43253 The source 'libde265' and version '1.0.2-2+deb9u2' do not appear to match any binary packages Marked as fixed i

Processed: fixed 1014999 in 1.0.2-2+deb9u2

2023-02-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > fixed 1014999 1.0.2-2+deb9u2 Bug #1014999 {Done: Tobias Frost } [src:libde265] libde265: CVE-2020-21595 CVE-2020-21597 CVE-2020-21599 CVE-2020-21601 CVE-2020-21603 CVE-2020-21604 CVE-2020-21605 CVE-2020-21606 The source 'libde265' and version '1

Processed: fixed 1014977 in 1.0.2-2+deb9u2

2023-02-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > fixed 1014977 1.0.2-2+deb9u2 Bug #1014977 {Done: Philipp Kern } [src:libde265] libde265: CVE-2022-1253 CVE-2021-36411 CVE-2021-36410 CVE-2021-36408 CVE-2021-35452 The source 'libde265' and version '1.0.2-2+deb9u2' do not appear to match any bina

Processed: fixed 1004963 in 1.0.2-2+deb9u2

2023-02-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > fixed 1004963 1.0.2-2+deb9u2 Bug #1004963 {Done: Tobias Frost } [src:libde265] CVE-2020-21598 CVE-2020-21600 CVE-2020-21602 The source 'libde265' and version '1.0.2-2+deb9u2' do not appear to match any binary packages Marked as fixed in versions

Bug#1030533: qt5-avif-image-plugin: file conflict with kimageformat-plugins

2023-02-04 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
Package: qt5-avif-image-plugin Version: 0.5.1+dfsg-1 Severity: serious If kimageformat-plugins is installed: $ apt install --no-install-recommends qt5-avif-image-plugin Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done Reading state information... Done The following NEW packages will

Processed: Bug#1029099 marked as pending in soundgrain

2023-02-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1029099 [soundgrain] soundgrain does not start Added tag(s) pending. -- 1029099: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1029099 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1029099: marked as done (soundgrain does not start)

2023-02-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 04 Feb 2023 21:52:13 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1029099: fixed in soundgrain 6.0.1-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #1029099, regarding soundgrain does not start to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this

Processing of soundgrain_6.0.1-4_source.changes

2023-02-04 Thread Debian FTP Masters
soundgrain_6.0.1-4_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: soundgrain_6.0.1-4.dsc soundgrain_6.0.1-4.debian.tar.xz soundgrain_6.0.1-4_amd64.buildinfo Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)

soundgrain_6.0.1-4_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2023-02-04 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Thank you for your contribution to Debian. Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2023 16:20:26 -0500 Source: soundgrain Architecture: source Version: 6.0.1-4 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Multimedia Maintainers Chan

Request to leave all lists

2023-02-04 Thread Brielyn Clayton
Hello debian-multimedia maintainers, A previous employee at Creative COW was involved in various lists involved with debian, using an email address from our domain at creativecow.net. We still receive emails from the group, and I've not been able to unsubscribe. I did visit the site and request m

vdr-plugin-vnsiserver is marked for autoremoval from testing

2023-02-04 Thread Debian testing autoremoval watch
vdr-plugin-vnsiserver 1:1.8.0+git20211205-2 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2023-02-15 It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs: 1026310: vdr-dev: dh_vdrplugin_depends fail with "error: Bug in helper:" https://bugs.debian.org/1026310 1026475: vdr-dev: vdr-plugin-remote: FTBFS:

Processed: Re: Bug#958865: Acknowledgement (mplayer: theora playback broken: vf_get_image: Assertion `h == -1 || h >= vf->h' failed.)

2023-02-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > severity 958865 normal Bug #958865 [mplayer] mplayer: theora playback broken: vf_get_image: Assertion `h == -1 || h >= vf->h' failed. Severity set to 'normal' from 'important' > merge 958865 920485 Bug #958865 [mplayer] mplayer: theora playback broken: vf_get_image: