liblivemedia_2020.08.19-1_multi.changes REJECTED

Hi, unfortunately we have to reject this package: This package contains non-free code copied from RFC 3550. RFC 3550 was written in 2003, prior to the modifications to the relicensing of RFCs in 2005 to make the code written in RFC licensed under an open source license. Debian confirmed this

liblivemedia_2020.03.06-1_multi.changes REJECTED

see other reject === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns.

liblivemedia_2020.04.12-1_multi.changes REJECTED

see other reject === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns.

liblivemedia_2020.07.09-1_multi.changes REJECTED

see other reject === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns.

gmerlin-avdecoder_1.0.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Maintainer, rejected: * Package: libgmerlin-avdec1 Depends: libcdio7 which is no longer in unstable Only 1 copyright notice in debian/copyright: Copyright © 2001-2008 Burkhard Plaum ./lib/bgav.c: * Copyright (c) 2001 - 2008 Members of the Gmerlin project more files...

gmerlin_0.3.8-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Maintainer, rejected - your package is using the GFDL license at least for parts in its doc/ subdirectory. You need to mention that in your debian/copyright and you also need to check if the usage of GFDL it does is ok with the vote we had on it, see http://www.debian.org/vote/2006/vote_001

gigedit_0.1.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Maintainer, rejected, I bet you want more content than just usr/share/doc... I also bet you havent checked the package you uploaded. -- bye Joerg === If you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if the override file requires editing, reply to this email. -- To

Re: RFS: zynaddsubfx

I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2.2.1-4.1 of my package zynaddsubfx. Has anyone pinged Eduardo recently? This is an important package, which needs proper maintainance. The upload should probably be sponsored via debian-multimedia rather than QA. Opinions, Offers? :) Its in no

Comments regarding amb-plugins_0.3.0-1_amd64.changes

W: amb-plugins: menu-command-not-in-package /usr/share/menu/amb-plugins:2 /usr/bin/amb-plugins W: amb-plugins: menu-item-uses-apps-section /usr/share/menu/amb-plugins:2 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fwd: qtractor_0.0.8.762-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi See the mail below, you want to upload with a fixed key. ---BeginMessage--- Rejected: internal error while performing signature check on qtractor_0.0.8.762-1_amd64.changes. found duplicate status token ('KEYEXPIRED'). found duplicate status token ('KEYEXPIRED'). found duplicate status token

oss2jack_0.25-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Maintainer, rejected: - It was downloaded from Upstream Author: Kor Nielsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Ohhh, where do you get /dev/brain from? :) -- bye Joerg === If you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if the override file requires editing, reply to this email.

jackdmp_0.62-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Maintainer, please fix your lintian E: E: libjackmp0: ldconfig-symlink-missing-for-shlib usr/lib/libjack.so.0 usr/lib/libjackmp.so libjack.so.0 -- bye Joerg === If you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if the override file requires editing, reply to this email. -- To

create_0.1.3-2_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Maintainer, rejected, sorry. The package name is a little bit too generic - create. And yes, even if its upstreams name (a very bad name selection looking at its contents). -- bye Joerg === If you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if the override file requires editing,

create_0.1.3-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

please see -2 reject === If you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if the override file requires editing, reply to this email. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: create_0.1.3-2_amd64.changes REJECTED

On 11013 March 1977, Daniel James wrote: The package name is a little bit too generic - create. And yes, even if its upstreams name (a very bad name selection looking at its contents). How about 'creative-resources' for a package name? Thats way better, and also fits more for what is in. --

kmidimon_0.5.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Maintainer, rejected, doc/ has FDLNotice, so you need to list that license difference in your debian/copyright. -- bye Joerg === If you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if the override file requires editing, reply to this email. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL

xsynth-dssi_0.9.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Maintainer, rejected: W: xsynth-dssi: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath ./usr/lib/dssi/xsynth-dssi/Xsynth_gtk /usr/lib W: xsynth-dssi: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath ./usr/lib/dssi/xsynth-dssi.so /usr/lib Sometimes an rpath may be useful, but not in this case. Please fix. While you are at it

openmovieeditor_0.0.20060504-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Maintainer, rejected, you missed to mention files with different licenses in your debian/copyright, like src/portaudio/* (you should use the debian packaged version anyways, but you still need to mention it, its in yourt tarball) or src/tinyxml/*. -- bye Joerg === If you don't

om_0.2.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Maintainer, rejected - i cant find ladspa-vcf, ladspa-omins as packages in the archive, but you depend on them. Maybe I just miss it, so if its there point me at it. Additionally your debian/copyright is wrong, there is no om-synth-patches package, -- bye Joerg === If you don't