Bug#1069255: libheif: please consider using aom as the preferred plugin and demoting x265 to suggests

Package: libheif Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com Usertags: origin-ubuntu noble ubuntu-patch Dear Maintainer, According to[1], the MIR work was prioritized on aom packages, and due to x265 nack and plans to replace it with kvazaar, it was demoted to Suggests.

Bug#1052214: libde265: Please add autopkgtest to libde265 package

Source: libde265 Version: 1.0.11-1 Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-Cc: vladimir.pe...@canonical.com Dear Maintainer, libde265 lacks autopkgtests preventing it from being included in the main pocket in Ubuntu[1]. Would it be possible to consider a merge proposal[2] that adds a basic smoke test for

Bug#1030890: libwebm: Provide additional headers to alllow building aom with the system libwebm

/7ztiZTH8xBA/m/ahIbZOIiN3gJ [2] https://github.com/microsoft/vcpkg/commit/b11941140ce64dd4ccefec44fed6a7719ba3aaf5 On Sun, Feb 12, 2023 at 9:49 PM Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > > Control: tags -1 moreinfo > > Hi Vladimir > > On 2023-02-09 08:37:06 +1300, Vladimir Petko wrote: &g

Bug#1030891: aom: Use system libwebm instead of the bundled one

Package: aom Version: aom Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com Usertags: origin-ubuntu lunar ubuntu-patch X-Debbugs-Cc: vladimir.pe...@canonical.com Dear Maintainer, Package aom currently builds with the bundled libwebm located in the `third_party` directory. This

Bug#1030890: libwebm: Provide additional headers to alllow building aom with the system libwebm

Package: libwebm Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com Usertags: origin-ubuntu lunar ubuntu-patch X-Debbugs-Cc: vladimir.pe...@canonical.com Dear Maintainer, In order to build aom using the system libwebm, aom needs access to /mkvparser/* and /mkvmuxer/* headers. In