tags 482509 +patch
thanks
IMO it is a very bad idea to have a package build against a legally
dubious library just because the system it was built on happened to
have it installed.
lame itself is not legally dubious, it's just unfortunate in being
liable to software patent enforcement on MP3
On fredagen den 30 maj 2008, you stated the following:
> The ftbfs on autobuilder issue could be fixed by switching the order of
> the optional build-dependencies.
However, toolame is a stand-alone command-line encoder; it's hardly of any use
when building idjc. Free may really have meant libtwol
Hi Peter,
IMO it is a very bad idea to have a package build against a legally
dubious library just because the system it was built on happened to have
it installed.
lame itself is not legally dubious, it's just unfortunate in being
liable to software patent enforcement on MP3 encoding. That'
The ftbfs on autobuilder issue could be fixed by switching the order of
the optional build-dependencies.
but IMO it is a very bad idea to have a package build against a legally
dubious library just because the system it was built on happened to have
it installed.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
Package: idjc
Version: 0.7.5-4
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080522 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
This rebuild was done with gcc 4.3 instead of gcc 4.2, because gcc 4.3
is
5 matches
Mail list logo
