Just to clear up some something it sounds like you've misunderstood: the
multimedia team, ham team, etc., all maintain packages in main. So it's
not a choice of multimedia v. main.
Main is where free software (per the DFSG) goes. It's also required to
be self-contained (you don't need to run softw
Hi Frans,
> what advice would you
> have for the other software tools sets created by ODR? The same team?
Yes indeed, there is a lot of specialist knowledge in this field that
doesn't cross over much into the regular multimedia packaging tasks.
These are very cool tools and it would be great to
Hi Frans,
> My question, fits DABlin better with main or multimedia?
For software defined radio the best team might be
https://wiki.debian.org/DebianHams
https://blends.debian.org/hamradio/tasks/sdr does include receiver
applications.
Cheers!
Daniel
On Fri, 2017-08-25 at 14:07 +0100, Daniel James wrote:
> > My question, fits DABlin better with main or multimedia?
>
> For software defined radio the best team might be
> https://wiki.debian.org/DebianHams
>
> https://blends.debian.org/hamradio/tasks/sdr does include receiver
> applications.
H
Dear Debian Multimedia team,
Some week ago i posted a request for packaging of a DAB+ radio receiver
project for the main repo. Today i found out you guys from multimedia.
My question, fits DABlin better with main or multimedia?
RFP: dablin -- CLI and GTK GUI DAB & DAB+ receiver client ...
https
5 matches
Mail list logo
