On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 12:29:46PM -0600, Matt Armstrong wrote:
> Claudio Sacerdoti Coen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > What I found very annoying of Sven solution is that if you install
> > a package by hand (Bad Thing TM), the next time you install an
> > ocaml debian package the entry fo
On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 07:47:20PM +0200, Claudio Sacerdoti Coen wrote:
> What I found very annoying of Sven solution is that if you
> install a package by hand (Bad Thing TM),
> the next time you install an ocaml debian package the entry
> for the hand-installed one disappears. This means tha
On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 11:14:39AM -0600, Matt Armstrong wrote:
> Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > BTW, Xavier don't likes ocaml-ldconf :(((
> >
> > What do you all thing about it ?
>
> I basically buy Xavier's argument. I had quite a bit of problems with
> ocaml not finding .so fi
On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 05:29:52PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> BTW, Xavier don't likes ocaml-ldconf :(((
>
> What do you all thing about it ?
I already replied on the ocaml ML, anyway: I think that the better
solution is to have all .so files in a single directory (maybe
/usr/lib/ocaml itself or
On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 10:34:26PM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
> > That said, i find that all this woody release stuff is a mess, and would
> > benefit from some more transparency.
>
> See the ongoing discussion on debian-qa. I'm amazed.
> Enough
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> That said, i find that all this woody release stuff is a mess, and would
> benefit from some more transparency.
See the ongoing discussion on debian-qa. I'm amazed.
Enough said.
--
Jérôme Marant
http://marant.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIB
On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 06:41:34PM +0200, Remi VANICAT wrote:
[...]
> his suggestion :
> "So, to summarize, I strongly suggest the following approach for RPMs
> or Debian packages:
> - The main Caml package can add one or two lines to ld.conf,
> e.g. /var/lib/ocaml/shlibs (for libraries installed
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Denis Barbier) writes:
> On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 07:47:20PM +0200, Claudio Sacerdoti Coen wrote:
>> What I found very annoying of Sven solution is that if you
>> install a package by hand (Bad Thing TM),
>> the next time you install an ocaml debian package the entry
>> for t
On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 05:29:52PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> BTW, Xavier don't likes ocaml-ldconf :(((
>
> What do you all thing about it ?
I already replied on the ocaml ML, anyway: I think that the better
solution is to have all .so files in a single directory (maybe
/usr/lib/ocaml itself or
On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 10:34:26PM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
> > That said, i find that all this woody release stuff is a mess, and would
> > benefit from some more transparency.
>
> See the ongoing discussion on debian-qa. I'm amazed.
> Enoug
On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 07:47:20PM +0200, Claudio Sacerdoti Coen wrote:
> What I found very annoying of Sven solution is that if you
> install a package by hand (Bad Thing TM),
> the next time you install an ocaml debian package the entry
> for the hand-installed one disappears. This means that
Claudio Sacerdoti Coen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What I found very annoying of Sven solution is that if you install
> a package by hand (Bad Thing TM), the next time you install an
> ocaml debian package the entry for the hand-installed one
> disappears. This means that you have to learn o
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> That said, i find that all this woody release stuff is a mess, and would
> benefit from some more transparency.
See the ongoing discussion on debian-qa. I'm amazed.
Enough said.
--
Jérôme Marant
http://marant.org
--
To UNSUBSCRI
On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 06:41:34PM +0200, Remi VANICAT wrote:
[...]
> his suggestion :
> "So, to summarize, I strongly suggest the following approach for RPMs
> or Debian packages:
> - The main Caml package can add one or two lines to ld.conf,
> e.g. /var/lib/ocaml/shlibs (for libraries installe
What I found very annoying of Sven solution is that if you
install a package by hand (Bad Thing TM),
the next time you install an ocaml debian package the entry
for the hand-installed one disappears. This means that you
have to learn ocaml-ldconf to understand what is happening...
I don't by
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Denis Barbier) writes:
> On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 07:47:20PM +0200, Claudio Sacerdoti Coen wrote:
>> What I found very annoying of Sven solution is that if you
>> install a package by hand (Bad Thing TM),
>> the next time you install an ocaml debian package the entry
>> for
On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 07:47:20PM +0200, Claudio Sacerdoti Coen wrote:
> What I found very annoying of Sven solution is that if you
> install a package by hand (Bad Thing TM),
> the next time you install an ocaml debian package the entry
> for the hand-installed one disappears. This means tha
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> BTW, Xavier don't likes ocaml-ldconf :(((
>
> What do you all thing about it ?
I basically buy Xavier's argument. I had quite a bit of problems with
ocaml not finding .so files, etc. and had to go learn how ocaml-ldconf
worked. :-)
I have the impressio
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Denis Barbier) writes:
> On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 05:29:52PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> [...]
>> BTW, Xavier don't likes ocaml-ldconf :(((
>
> Did he gave some reasons?
to quote him :
"The ld.conf mechanism was modeled after the /etc/ld.so.conf file used
by the Unix dynamic lo
On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 05:29:52PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
[...]
> BTW, Xavier don't likes ocaml-ldconf :(((
Did he gave some reasons?
Denis
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Claudio Sacerdoti Coen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What I found very annoying of Sven solution is that if you install
> a package by hand (Bad Thing TM), the next time you install an
> ocaml debian package the entry for the hand-installed one
> disappears. This means that you have to learn
On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 02:06:31PM +0200, J?r?me Marant wrote:
> On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 01:16:11PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> > > > -(altough i don't understand why, and especially why woody has not yet
> > > > been released).
> > >
> > > RC bugs in base and standard in woody.
> >
> > But
What I found very annoying of Sven solution is that if you
install a package by hand (Bad Thing TM),
the next time you install an ocaml debian package the entry
for the hand-installed one disappears. This means that you
have to learn ocaml-ldconf to understand what is happening...
I don't b
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> BTW, Xavier don't likes ocaml-ldconf :(((
>
> What do you all thing about it ?
I basically buy Xavier's argument. I had quite a bit of problems with
ocaml not finding .so files, etc. and had to go learn how ocaml-ldconf
worked. :-)
I have the impressi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Denis Barbier) writes:
> On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 05:29:52PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> [...]
>> BTW, Xavier don't likes ocaml-ldconf :(((
>
> Did he gave some reasons?
to quote him :
"The ld.conf mechanism was modeled after the /etc/ld.so.conf file used
by the Unix dynamic l
On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 05:29:52PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
[...]
> BTW, Xavier don't likes ocaml-ldconf :(((
Did he gave some reasons?
Denis
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 02:06:31PM +0200, J?r?me Marant wrote:
> On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 01:16:11PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> > > > -(altough i don't understand why, and especially why woody has not yet
> > > > been released).
> > >
> > > RC bugs in base and standard in woody.
> >
> > But
On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 01:16:11PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > -(altough i don't understand why, and especially why woody has not yet
> > > been released).
> >
> > RC bugs in base and standard in woody.
>
> But zhere the plan not to let the not base and standard stuff evolve
> until all RC
On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 09:11:48AM +0200, J?r?me Marant wrote:
> On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 08:28:32AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 01:42:28PM +0200, J?r?me Marant wrote:
> > > On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 01:36:06PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > >
> > > > package. It will be too
On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 01:16:11PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > -(altough i don't understand why, and especially why woody has not yet
> > > been released).
> >
> > RC bugs in base and standard in woody.
>
> But zhere the plan not to let the not base and standard stuff evolve
> until all R
On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 09:11:48AM +0200, J?r?me Marant wrote:
> On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 08:28:32AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 01:42:28PM +0200, J?r?me Marant wrote:
> > > On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 01:36:06PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > >
> > > > package. It will be too
Dear Sirs:
We know your esteemed company in beach towels from Internet, and pleased to
introduce us as a leading producer of high quality 100% cotton velour printed
towels in China, we sincerely hope to establish a long-term business
relationship with your esteemed company in this field.
Our
On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 08:28:32AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 01:42:28PM +0200, J?r?me Marant wrote:
> > On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 01:36:06PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> >
> > > package. It will be too late for the woody release though.
> >
> > Testing scripts have been t
On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 02:26:35PM +0200, Remi VANICAT wrote:
> Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > From: Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: caml-mode]
> > To: debian-ocaml-maint@lists.debian.org
> > Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 13:31:24 +0200
> > X-Sieve: cmu-siev
On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 01:42:28PM +0200, J?r?me Marant wrote:
> On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 01:36:06PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> > package. It will be too late for the woody release though.
>
> Testing scripts have been turned off anyway ...
That was what i was saying.
-(altough i don't unde
Dear Sirs:
We know your esteemed company in beach towels from Internet, and pleased to introduce
us as a leading producer of high quality 100% cotton velour printed towels in China,
we sincerely hope to establish a long-term business relationship with your esteemed
company in this field.
Ou
36 matches
Mail list logo
