Re: Cameleon packages almost done

2002-10-09 Thread Jérôme Marant
En réponse à Sven LUTHER [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hello Jerome. Hello, There was a question about cameleon compilation on debian on the caml-list today, about someone who is not able to build cameleon on a unstable debian system. Here is what he says : I followed the instructions in the

Re: Cameleon packages almost done

2002-10-09 Thread Jérôme Marant
En réponse à Jérôme Marant [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I'm going to answer him this afternoon (I don't have currently a copy of his message). Well, I managed to answer :-) Cheers, -- Jérôme Marant [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://marant.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Re: Cameleon packages almost done

2002-10-09 Thread Sven LUTHER
On Wed, Oct 09, 2002 at 10:02:48AM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote: En réponse à Sven LUTHER [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hello Jerome. Hello, There was a question about cameleon compilation on debian on the caml-list today, about someone who is not able to build cameleon on a unstable debian

Re: Cameleon packages almost done

2002-10-09 Thread Jérôme Marant
En réponse à Sven LUTHER [EMAIL PROTECTED]: The packages are ready. I'm justing doing some bits of extra testing before I upload them on a stagging area. Mmm, why not in unstable directly ? Because configwin needs to be removed from the archive first since cameleon provides it. Cheers,

Dear friends, never miss the chance to travel in China, thebeautiful and mysterious place to be!

2002-10-09 Thread holidaycn2002
charset=ISO-8859-1; charset=ISO-8859-1; charset=ISO-8859-1; charset=ISO-8859-1; charset=ISO-8859-1; charset=ISO-8859-1; charset=ISO-8859-1; charset=ISO-8859-1; charset=ISO-8859-1; charset=ISO-8859-1; charset=ISO-8859-1;

Re: Cameleon packages almost done

2002-10-09 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Wed, Oct 09, 2002 at 12:59:23PM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote: What as that to do with it ? The problem is that the name of the already uploaded version of configwin is the same as the name of the package that will be provided by cameleon (with name I mean name of the binary package). So

Re: Cameleon packages almost done

2002-10-09 Thread Sven LUTHER
On Wed, Oct 09, 2002 at 01:38:02PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: On Wed, Oct 09, 2002 at 12:59:23PM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote: What as that to do with it ? The problem is that the name of the already uploaded version of configwin is the same as the name of the package that will be

Re: Cameleon packages almost done

2002-10-09 Thread Jérôme Marant
En réponse à Sven LUTHER [EMAIL PROTECTED]: What as that to do with it ? I had ocaml providing ocamltk in the archive long before ocamltk was finally removed. The pool mechanism can handle that, no problem. Just do a Provides, conflict and replaces configwin, and everything will be

Re: Cameleon packages almost done

2002-10-09 Thread Sven LUTHER
On Wed, Oct 09, 2002 at 02:02:12PM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote: En réponse à Sven LUTHER [EMAIL PROTECTED]: What as that to do with it ? I had ocaml providing ocamltk in the archive long before ocamltk was finally removed. The pool mechanism can handle that, no problem. Just do a

Re: Cameleon packages almost done

2002-10-09 Thread Jérôme Marant
En réponse à Sven LUTHER [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Well, no. It is quite different here. I do build a libconfigwin-ocaml-dev package from the cameleon source and such a package already exist in the archive and is built from the configwin source. But if you don't release a newer version of

Re: Cameleon packages almost done

2002-10-09 Thread Sven LUTHER
On Wed, Oct 09, 2002 at 02:12:26PM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote: En réponse à Sven LUTHER [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Well, no. It is quite different here. I do build a libconfigwin-ocaml-dev package from the cameleon source and such a package already exist in the archive and is built from

Re: Cameleon packages almost done

2002-10-09 Thread Remi VANICAT
Jérôme Marant [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: (That said, you can do all that and upload to a staging area all the same). I also want to ensure everything works fine before uploading: people will be able to test and report remaining bugs. Isn't what unstable is made for ? -- Rémi

Re: Cameleon packages almost done

2002-10-09 Thread Jérôme Marant
En réponse à Sven LUTHER [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I'm pretty sure that katie would reject it because the pool is managed through a database indexed by (at least) package name. Not package source name ? Both I think. The madison script works with both. And what do you want to do, ask

Re: Cameleon packages almost done

2002-10-09 Thread Jérôme Marant
En réponse à Remi VANICAT [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Jérôme Marant [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: (That said, you can do all that and upload to a staging area all the same). I also want to ensure everything works fine before uploading: people will be able to test and report remaining

Re: Cameleon packages almost done

2002-10-09 Thread Sven LUTHER
On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 11:26:27AM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote: Hello, I have almost finished the preparation of the Cameleon packages (Thanks Dimitri Ara for upstream fixes). However, I still have some wonderings: - as defined by upstream, all cameleon libraries are being

Re: Cameleon packages almost done

2002-10-09 Thread Jérôme Marant
En réponse à Sven LUTHER [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hello Jerome. Hello, There was a question about cameleon compilation on debian on the caml-list today, about someone who is not able to build cameleon on a unstable debian system. Here is what he says : I followed the instructions in the

Re: Cameleon packages almost done

2002-10-09 Thread Jérôme Marant
En réponse à Jérôme Marant [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I'm going to answer him this afternoon (I don't have currently a copy of his message). Well, I managed to answer :-) Cheers, -- Jérôme Marant [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://marant.org

Re: Cameleon packages almost done

2002-10-09 Thread Sven LUTHER
On Wed, Oct 09, 2002 at 10:02:48AM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote: En réponse à Sven LUTHER [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hello Jerome. Hello, There was a question about cameleon compilation on debian on the caml-list today, about someone who is not able to build cameleon on a unstable debian

Re: Cameleon packages almost done

2002-10-09 Thread Jérôme Marant
En réponse à Sven LUTHER [EMAIL PROTECTED]: The packages are ready. I'm justing doing some bits of extra testing before I upload them on a stagging area. Mmm, why not in unstable directly ? Because configwin needs to be removed from the archive first since cameleon provides it. Cheers,

Dear friends, never miss the chance to travel in China, the beautiful and mysterious place to be!

2002-10-09 Thread holidaycn2002
charset=ISO-8859-1; charset=ISO-8859-1; charset=ISO-8859-1; charset=ISO-8859-1; charset=ISO-8859-1; charset=ISO-8859-1; charset=ISO-8859-1; charset=ISO-8859-1; charset=ISO-8859-1; charset=ISO-8859-1; charset=ISO-8859-1;

Re: Cameleon packages almost done

2002-10-09 Thread Sven LUTHER
On Wed, Oct 09, 2002 at 11:42:24AM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote: En réponse à Sven LUTHER [EMAIL PROTECTED]: The packages are ready. I'm justing doing some bits of extra testing before I upload them on a stagging area. Mmm, why not in unstable directly ? Because configwin needs to

Re: Cameleon packages almost done

2002-10-09 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Wed, Oct 09, 2002 at 12:59:23PM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote: What as that to do with it ? The problem is that the name of the already uploaded version of configwin is the same as the name of the package that will be provided by cameleon (with name I mean name of the binary package). So probably

Re: Cameleon packages almost done

2002-10-09 Thread Sven LUTHER
On Wed, Oct 09, 2002 at 01:38:02PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: On Wed, Oct 09, 2002 at 12:59:23PM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote: What as that to do with it ? The problem is that the name of the already uploaded version of configwin is the same as the name of the package that will be

Re: Cameleon packages almost done

2002-10-09 Thread Jérôme Marant
En réponse à Sven LUTHER [EMAIL PROTECTED]: What as that to do with it ? I had ocaml providing ocamltk in the archive long before ocamltk was finally removed. The pool mechanism can handle that, no problem. Just do a Provides, conflict and replaces configwin, and everything will be

Re: Cameleon packages almost done

2002-10-09 Thread Sven LUTHER
On Wed, Oct 09, 2002 at 02:02:12PM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote: En réponse à Sven LUTHER [EMAIL PROTECTED]: What as that to do with it ? I had ocaml providing ocamltk in the archive long before ocamltk was finally removed. The pool mechanism can handle that, no problem. Just do a

Re: Cameleon packages almost done

2002-10-09 Thread Jérôme Marant
En réponse à Sven LUTHER [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Well, no. It is quite different here. I do build a libconfigwin-ocaml-dev package from the cameleon source and such a package already exist in the archive and is built from the configwin source. But if you don't release a newer version of

Re: Cameleon packages almost done

2002-10-09 Thread Sven LUTHER
On Wed, Oct 09, 2002 at 02:12:26PM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote: En réponse à Sven LUTHER [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Well, no. It is quite different here. I do build a libconfigwin-ocaml-dev package from the cameleon source and such a package already exist in the archive and is built from the

Re: Cameleon packages almost done

2002-10-09 Thread Jérôme Marant
En réponse à Remi VANICAT [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Jérôme Marant [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: (That said, you can do all that and upload to a staging area all the same). I also want to ensure everything works fine before uploading: people will be able to test and report remaining

Funziona Davvero!!!

2002-10-09 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Vorresti Davvero Guadagnare con Internet? Bene, la prima cosa da fare è salvare su disco questa pagina per averla a portata di mano anche se il tuo PC non è connesso a Internet, poi copia tutto in Word o in Blocco Note e stampalo, così lo potrai leggere con più attenzione.

Accepted advi 1.2.0-1 (i386 source)

2002-10-09 Thread Sven Luther
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2002 18:18:43 +0200 Source: advi Binary: advi Architecture: source i386 Version: 1.2.0-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: