On Sat, Mar 08, 2003 at 10:06:43PM +0100, Remi Vanicat wrote:
> - mlgtk/lablgtk/lablgtk2 have modules that have the same name.
> - labltk and shell have a Shell module
> - labltk and camlimage have a Image module
Well the "same name problem" is a problem only if the modules with the
same name are
Goswin Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Format: 1.7
>> Date: Sat, 08 Mar 2003 11:10:20 +0100
>> Source: lablgtk2
>> Binary: liblablgtk2-ocaml liblablgtk2-ocaml-dev
>> Architecture: source i386
>
> Why i386 only?
It is a changelog! It was built o
On Sun, Mar 09, 2003 at 11:28:14AM +0100, Goswin Brederlow wrote:
> Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Format: 1.7
> > Date: Sat, 08 Mar 2003 11:10:20 +0100
> > Source: lablgtk2
> > Binary: liblablgtk2-ocaml liblablgtk2-ocaml-dev
> > Architecture: source i386
>
> Why i386 only?
Becaus
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, Mar 09, 2003 at 10:04:11AM +0100, Jérôme Marant wrote:
>> Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>
>> > libsdl-ocaml libsdl-ocaml-dev
>> > libsdl-ttf2.0-0 (hppa FTBFS RC bug, easy one, config.guess is outdated).
>> >
>> > Well, this one
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Format: 1.7
> Date: Sat, 08 Mar 2003 11:10:20 +0100
> Source: lablgtk2
> Binary: liblablgtk2-ocaml liblablgtk2-ocaml-dev
> Architecture: source i386
Why i386 only?
MfG
Goswin
On Sat, Mar 08, 2003 at 10:06:43PM +0100, Remi Vanicat wrote:
> - mlgtk/lablgtk/lablgtk2 have modules that have the same name.
> - labltk and shell have a Shell module
> - labltk and camlimage have a Image module
Well the "same name problem" is a problem only if the modules with the
same name are
On Sun, Mar 09, 2003 at 10:04:11AM +0100, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
> > libsdl-ocaml libsdl-ocaml-dev
> > libsdl-ttf2.0-0 (hppa FTBFS RC bug, easy one, config.guess is outdated).
> >
> > Well, this one doesn't seem all that difficult. i have not checke
Goswin Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Format: 1.7
>> Date: Sat, 08 Mar 2003 11:10:20 +0100
>> Source: lablgtk2
>> Binary: liblablgtk2-ocaml liblablgtk2-ocaml-dev
>> Architecture: source i386
>
> Why i386 only?
It is a changelog! It was built o
On Sun, Mar 09, 2003 at 11:28:14AM +0100, Goswin Brederlow wrote:
> Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Format: 1.7
> > Date: Sat, 08 Mar 2003 11:10:20 +0100
> > Source: lablgtk2
> > Binary: liblablgtk2-ocaml liblablgtk2-ocaml-dev
> > Architecture: source i386
>
> Why i386 only?
Becaus
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> libsdl-ocaml libsdl-ocaml-dev
> libsdl-ttf2.0-0 (hppa FTBFS RC bug, easy one, config.guess is outdated).
>
> Well, this one doesn't seem all that difficult. i have not checked the
> libsdl-ttf2.0-0 dependencies though.
Already fixed few days ago.
Ch
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, Mar 09, 2003 at 10:04:11AM +0100, Jérôme Marant wrote:
>> Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>
>> > libsdl-ocaml libsdl-ocaml-dev
>> > libsdl-ttf2.0-0 (hppa FTBFS RC bug, easy one, config.guess is outdated).
>> >
>> > Well, this one
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Format: 1.7
> Date: Sat, 08 Mar 2003 11:10:20 +0100
> Source: lablgtk2
> Binary: liblablgtk2-ocaml liblablgtk2-ocaml-dev
> Architecture: source i386
Why i386 only?
MfG
Goswin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "uns
On Sun, Mar 09, 2003 at 10:04:11AM +0100, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
> > libsdl-ocaml libsdl-ocaml-dev
> > libsdl-ttf2.0-0 (hppa FTBFS RC bug, easy one, config.guess is outdated).
> >
> > Well, this one doesn't seem all that difficult. i have not checke
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> libsdl-ocaml libsdl-ocaml-dev
> libsdl-ttf2.0-0 (hppa FTBFS RC bug, easy one, config.guess is outdated).
>
> Well, this one doesn't seem all that difficult. i have not checked the
> libsdl-ttf2.0-0 dependencies though.
Already fixed few days ago.
Ch
14 matches
Mail list logo