*****SPAM***** Re: no exam, valium, xanax, viagra, & more

2003-03-31 Thread Murray Askew
This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --9F.3_AB7D6 Content-Type: text/html Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =

Unidentified subject!

2003-03-31 Thread list

Cameleon completed

2003-03-31 Thread Jérôme Marant
Hi, I have the pleasure to announced that cameleon has been finaly built on ARM, after months of pain. Cheers, -- Jérôme Marant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: Cameleon completed

2003-03-31 Thread Sven Luther
On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 11:19:57AM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote: > Hi, > > I have the pleasure to announced that cameleon has been finaly > built on ARM, after months of pain. Note that i did ask on debian-arm last friday or so, and got a response there, i thought you did also, didn't you ? Ok, Th

Re: Cameleon completed

2003-03-31 Thread Jérôme Marant
En réponse à Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > ocamlsdl : sdl-mixer1.2 is not ready to enter testing because of > the > > libvorbis mess. The problem seems to have been solved, but other > > packages may hinder either sdl-mixer1.2 or libvorbis to enter > testing. > > > > libpgsql-ocaml

Re: Cameleon completed

2003-03-31 Thread Sven Luther
On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 03:26:59PM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote: > En réponse à Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > ocamlsdl : sdl-mixer1.2 is not ready to enter testing because of > > the > > > libvorbis mess. The problem seems to have been solved, but other > > > packages may hinder eit

Re: Cameleon completed

2003-03-31 Thread Jérôme Marant
En réponse à Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 11:19:57AM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I have the pleasure to announced that cameleon has been finaly > > built on ARM, after months of pain. > > Note that i did ask on debian-arm last friday or so, and got a

Re: Cameleon completed

2003-03-31 Thread Jérôme Marant
En réponse à Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > How would removing ocamsdl from testing solve problem? > > (if it solves problem, then I'm OK from removing it) > > If ocamlsdl is no more in testing, then ocaml 3.06 will not break the > version of ocamlsdl that is in testing, and will thus enter

Re: Cameleon completed

2003-03-31 Thread Sven Luther
On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 04:35:15PM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote: > En réponse à Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > How would removing ocamsdl from testing solve problem? > > > (if it solves problem, then I'm OK from removing it) > > > > If ocamlsdl is no more in testing, then ocaml 3.06 will

Re: Cameleon completed

2003-03-31 Thread Jérôme Marant
En réponse à Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > OK. Let's go for it. > > Let's wait for Stefano's response too, and let's check first that > there > are no missing problems. Could you ask on irc about the testing > scripts, > and if it is true that it does only check the dependencies and not t

Re: Cameleon completed

2003-03-31 Thread Sven Luther
On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 05:28:10PM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote: > En réponse à Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > OK. Let's go for it. > > > > Let's wait for Stefano's response too, and let's check first that > > there > > are no missing problems. Could you ask on irc about the testing >

Re: Cameleon completed

2003-03-31 Thread Jérôme Marant
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Sorry, I don't have access to IRC currently. And last time I asked about >> testing scripts, I've been bashed. > > No problem, i read the testing FAQ, and it seems my guesses would be ok. > I think we can ask for the removal (it is even documented in th

Re: Cameleon completed

2003-03-31 Thread Sven Luther
On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 08:41:56PM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote: > Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > >> Sorry, I don't have access to IRC currently. And last time I asked about > >> testing scripts, I've been bashed. > > > > No problem, i read the testing FAQ, and it seems my guesses w

Re: Cameleon completed

2003-03-31 Thread Jérôme Marant
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> I guess we have to file bug reports again ftp.debian.org. > > A yes, altough it is the same as writing to ftp-masters, and > > http://www.debian.org/devel/testing#faq > > says (sorry for the french, if you want it in your local, just follow > the above

Re: Cameleon completed

2003-03-31 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 09:11:54PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > If it is all the same to you, i can do this, and sign the mail as both > of you, and cc you to ? Ok, go for it. Cheers. -- Stefano Zacchiroli - Undergraduate Student of CS @ Uni. Bologna, Italy [EMAIL PROTECTED],debian.org,bononia

Re: Cameleon completed

2003-03-31 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 07:54:33PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > No problem, i read the testing FAQ, and it seems my guesses would be ok. > I think we can ask for the removal (it is even documented in the FAQ) as > soon as we have Stefano's approval. Approved! > How do we best go about this ? Do yo

*****SPAM***** Re: no exam, valium, xanax, viagra, & more

2003-03-31 Thread Murray Askew
This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --9F.3_AB7D6 Content-Type: text/html Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =

Unidentified subject!

2003-03-31 Thread bounce-debian-ocaml-maint=archive=jab . org
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Cameleon completed

2003-03-31 Thread Jérôme Marant
Hi, I have the pleasure to announced that cameleon has been finaly built on ARM, after months of pain. Cheers, -- Jérôme Marant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Cameleon completed

2003-03-31 Thread Sven Luther
On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 11:19:57AM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote: > Hi, > > I have the pleasure to announced that cameleon has been finaly > built on ARM, after months of pain. Note that i did ask on debian-arm last friday or so, and got a response there, i thought you did also, didn't you ? Ok, Th

Re: Cameleon completed

2003-03-31 Thread Jérôme Marant
En réponse à Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > ocamlsdl : sdl-mixer1.2 is not ready to enter testing because of > the > > libvorbis mess. The problem seems to have been solved, but other > > packages may hinder either sdl-mixer1.2 or libvorbis to enter > testing. > > > > libpgsql-ocaml

Re: Cameleon completed

2003-03-31 Thread Sven Luther
On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 03:26:59PM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote: > En réponse à Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > ocamlsdl : sdl-mixer1.2 is not ready to enter testing because of > > the > > > libvorbis mess. The problem seems to have been solved, but other > > > packages may hinder eit

Re: Cameleon completed

2003-03-31 Thread Jérôme Marant
En réponse à Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 11:19:57AM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I have the pleasure to announced that cameleon has been finaly > > built on ARM, after months of pain. > > Note that i did ask on debian-arm last friday or so, and got a

Re: Cameleon completed

2003-03-31 Thread Jérôme Marant
En réponse à Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > How would removing ocamsdl from testing solve problem? > > (if it solves problem, then I'm OK from removing it) > > If ocamlsdl is no more in testing, then ocaml 3.06 will not break the > version of ocamlsdl that is in testing, and will thus enter

Re: Cameleon completed

2003-03-31 Thread Sven Luther
On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 04:35:15PM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote: > En réponse à Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > How would removing ocamsdl from testing solve problem? > > > (if it solves problem, then I'm OK from removing it) > > > > If ocamlsdl is no more in testing, then ocaml 3.06 will

Re: Cameleon completed

2003-03-31 Thread Jérôme Marant
En réponse à Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > OK. Let's go for it. > > Let's wait for Stefano's response too, and let's check first that > there > are no missing problems. Could you ask on irc about the testing > scripts, > and if it is true that it does only check the dependencies and not t

Re: Cameleon completed

2003-03-31 Thread Sven Luther
On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 05:28:10PM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote: > En réponse à Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > OK. Let's go for it. > > > > Let's wait for Stefano's response too, and let's check first that > > there > > are no missing problems. Could you ask on irc about the testing >

Re: Cameleon completed

2003-03-31 Thread Sven Luther
On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 08:41:56PM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote: > Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > >> Sorry, I don't have access to IRC currently. And last time I asked about > >> testing scripts, I've been bashed. > > > > No problem, i read the testing FAQ, and it seems my guesses w

Re: Cameleon completed

2003-03-31 Thread Jérôme Marant
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> I guess we have to file bug reports again ftp.debian.org. > > A yes, altough it is the same as writing to ftp-masters, and > > http://www.debian.org/devel/testing#faq > > says (sorry for the french, if you want it in your local, just follow > the above

Re: Cameleon completed

2003-03-31 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 09:11:54PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > If it is all the same to you, i can do this, and sign the mail as both > of you, and cc you to ? Ok, go for it. Cheers. -- Stefano Zacchiroli - Undergraduate Student of CS @ Uni. Bologna, Italy [EMAIL PROTECTED],debian.org,bononia

Re: Cameleon completed

2003-03-31 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 07:54:33PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > No problem, i read the testing FAQ, and it seems my guesses would be ok. > I think we can ask for the removal (it is even documented in the FAQ) as > soon as we have Stefano's approval. Approved! > How do we best go about this ? Do yo

Re: Cameleon completed

2003-03-31 Thread Jérôme Marant
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Sorry, I don't have access to IRC currently. And last time I asked about >> testing scripts, I've been bashed. > > No problem, i read the testing FAQ, and it seems my guesses would be ok. > I think we can ask for the removal (it is even documented in th