On Wed, Apr 16, 2003 at 10:06:53PM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It is empty in your proposal, isn't it?
ocaml.tar.gz = ocaml_3.06.orig.tar.gz = apt-get source ocaml
ocaml-3.06.tar.gz = ocaml-3.06_3.06.orig.tar.gz = apt-get source
ocaml-3.06
On Wed, Apr 16, 2003 at 01:04:11PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
[...]
Mmm, after a bit of testing, i see. That said, the libmlgdome.so is a
symlink to the dllmlgdome.so, and maybe it would make more sense to move
this symlink to /usr/lib/libmlgdome.so, would it not ?
It is a stublib, so
On Thu, Apr 17, 2003 at 02:09:25PM +0200, Denis Barbier wrote:
On Wed, Apr 16, 2003 at 01:04:11PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
[...]
Mmm, after a bit of testing, i see. That said, the libmlgdome.so is a
symlink to the dllmlgdome.so, and maybe it would make more sense to move
this
On Thu, Apr 17, 2003 at 02:22:22PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
[...]
Is this symlink (dll - lib) a hack or is it the Right Thing?
It is a hack, i think.
Basically, the ocaml runtime system will dynamically link files named
dllxxx.so. This was a name scheme chosen with upstream, and we
OTOH Remi shows that this was the only problematic example.
Well, let's consider the example of Gtk widgets: any binding to
any Gtk widget needs to depend on the lablgtk binding. So far,
we are the only one that are shipping a Gtk widget in its own
package: many other guys have contributed
On Thu, Apr 17, 2003 at 05:14:50PM +0200, Claudio Sacerdoti Coen wrote:
OTOH Remi shows that this was the only problematic example.
Well, let's consider the example of Gtk widgets: any binding to
any Gtk widget needs to depend on the lablgtk binding. So far,
we are the only one that are
On Thu, Apr 17, 2003 at 06:06:32PM +0200, Claudio Sacerdoti Coen wrote:
[...]
We were talking about the fact that lablgtkmathview is the only
problematic example since it is the only binding depending on
another binding. I was just saying that every Gtk widget binding
is such an example
On Wed, Apr 16, 2003 at 10:06:53PM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
ocaml-3.06.tar.gz = ocaml-3.06_3.06.orig.tar.gz = apt-get source
ocaml-3.06
Yes, this is confusing for users.
Just my 0.02 EUR on this issue:
- I agree with the idea of having multiple ocaml version installed at
the same time
On Thu, Apr 17, 2003 at 04:29:15PM +0200, Denis Barbier wrote:
On Thu, Apr 17, 2003 at 02:22:22PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
[...]
Is this symlink (dll - lib) a hack or is it the Right Thing?
It is a hack, i think.
Basically, the ocaml runtime system will dynamically link files named
Stefano Zacchiroli [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So my 0.02 EUR can be summarized as:
- don't do hacks now to help ocaml enter testing
- upload ocaml-3.06 later to support multiple version of ocaml at the
same time during transition phases
This is wise.
--
Jérôme Marant
http://marant.org
10 matches
Mail list logo
