On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 12:37:50AM +0200, Sylvain LE GALL wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 11:02:07PM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> > Quoting Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > > > Releasing the CVS version of cameleon is out of question anyway.
> > >
> > > So we either ship old version of
Hi,
> On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 11:02:07PM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> > Quoting Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > > > Releasing the CVS version of cameleon is out of question anyway.
> > >
> > > So we either ship old version of cameleon or don't ship it, if the new
> > > cameleon is not
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 08:49:45AM +0200, Maxence Guesdon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 11:02:07PM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> > > Quoting Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > >
> > > > > Releasing the CVS version of cameleon is out of question anyway.
> > > >
> > > > So we either
[Please stop CC'ing me on reply. I'm reading the list so I don't
need to receive messages two. I can give lessons about how to
use Mutt properly to avoid this! ]
Quoting Sylvain LE GALL <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Today, cameleon compile on 3.07. But there is no release...
>
> I think maxence could
Quoting Maxence Guesdon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Ok, I will make a release of Cameleon for ocaml 3.07. I think I'll do it
> on friday. This release should be as stable (or even more) than the previous
> one, since it is mainly a bug fix release.
Don't hurry. I do not intend to release it in Debian
Quoting Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Don't hurry. I do not intend to release it in Debian sarge anyway.
> > I'd perfer to release a older but working cameleon than a new and
> > not so well tested new one.
>
> Erm, Maxence is speaking about a bugfix release of the labgtk1 cameleon,
> not
Hi,
I think it is Ok now, right?
- Forwarded message from Jacques Garrigue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2003 09:04:42 +0900
From: Jacques Garrigue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Jacques Garrigue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] ocaml 3.07 and optional argum
On Wed, 1 Oct 2003 09:41:10 +0200
Jérôme Marant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> [Please stop CC'ing me on reply. I'm reading the list so I don't
> need to receive messages two. I can give lessons about how to
> use Mutt properly to avoid this! ]
>
> Quoting Sylvain LE GALL <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
Quoting Maxence Guesdon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> This is a *stable* version. The unstable version is the lablgtk2 branch
> of the CVS.
>
> > Furthermore, we don't have to bother Maxence with Debian timeframes.
>
> Making a release is not a lot of work for cameleon.
OK, I see. Thanks for taking
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 09:57:32AM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> Quoting Maxence Guesdon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
> > Ok, I will make a release of Cameleon for ocaml 3.07. I think I'll do it
> > on friday. This release should be as stable (or even more) than the previous
> > one, since it is main
Hello all,
This has been fixed now, so we can safely upload the package.
I am a bit baffled about why 3.06-21 didn't make it to testing this
night, but maybe they need another night. I will delay the ocaml 3.07-1
upload upto tomorrow then, so we can have one more round of testing
before i do this
Hi,
How about ocaml-source containing the Ocaml source as a tarball
/usr/src/ocaml-source-3.07.tar.gz or .tar.bz2 rather than an
unpacked source? Kernel-source packages are made like this.
Cheers,
--
Jérôme Marant
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe".
Hi,
How about ocaml-source containing the Ocaml source as a tarball
/usr/src/ocaml-source-3.07.tar.gz or .tar.bz2 rather than an
unpacked source? Kernel-source packages are made like this.
Cheers,
--
Jérôme Marant
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe".
Jérôme Marant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> How about ocaml-source containing the Ocaml source as a tarball
> /usr/src/ocaml-source-3.07.tar.gz or .tar.bz2 rather than an
> unpacked source? Kernel-source packages are made like this.
Seem a good idea to me.
--
Rémi Vanicat
[EMAIL PROTECT
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 10:56:45AM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> Hi,
>
> How about ocaml-source containing the Ocaml source as a tarball
> /usr/src/ocaml-source-3.07.tar.gz or .tar.bz2 rather than an
> unpacked source? Kernel-source packages are made like this.
It must be a real important suggest
This is the patch that fix the bug directly from Michel Mauny (forwarded
here for the records).
I suggest to add it to the ocaml 3.07 package.
Cheers.
- Forwarded message from Jacques Garrigue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2003 09:04:42 +0900
From: Jacques Garrigue <[EMAIL PRO
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 10:56:45AM +0200, J?r?me Marant wrote:
> How about ocaml-source containing the Ocaml source as a tarball
> /usr/src/ocaml-source-3.07.tar.gz or .tar.bz2 rather than an unpacked
> source? Kernel-source packages are made like this.
I completely agree.
--
Stefano Zacchiroli
On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 08:03:18PM +0200, Ralf Treinen wrote:
> > I will upload the packages to my private repostory today though, so
> > everyone can already start building for it.
> Can you please recall the location of your private repository - or
> even better upload your package to alioth?
Quoting Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 10:56:45AM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > How about ocaml-source containing the Ocaml source as a tarball
> > /usr/src/ocaml-source-3.07.tar.gz or .tar.bz2 rather than an
> > unpacked source? Kernel-source packages ar
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 11:41:40AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> This is the patch that fix the bug directly from Michel Mauny (forwarded
> here for the records).
Yep, but it is unappliable. I am trying to get a clean unidiff patch out
of CVSright now.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSC
[ Cc: for the sake of rapidity ]
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 12:03:41PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > This is the patch that fix the bug directly from Michel Mauny (forwarded
> > here for the records).
> Yep, but it is unappliable. I am trying to get a clean unidiff patch
> out of CVSright now.
Stop!
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 12:23:23PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> [ Cc: for the sake of rapidity ]
>
> On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 12:03:41PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > This is the patch that fix the bug directly from Michel Mauny (forwarded
> > > here for the records).
> > Yep, but it is una
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 11:53:06AM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> Quoting Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 10:56:45AM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > How about ocaml-source containing the Ocaml source as a tarball
> > > /usr/src/ocaml-source-3.07.tar
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 11:41:40AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> I suggest to add it to the ocaml 3.07 package.
Attached a "human" version of the patch that can be applied with "patch
-p0" as usual to the root ocaml source directory. I'm rebuilding right
now ocaml with that patch to see if it
Quoting Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > No I didn't. I had to deal with a hardware failure. Either my IDE
> controler
> > or my hard drive died.
>
> Well, that sucks ... I hope it is not your harddisk, altough that
> usually is the most probable.
Hopefully, I have a laptop :P
--
Jérôme M
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 12:27:53PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> Well, i have it also, it was quite easy, but since i was also
> downloading the RotK trailer, my link was quite slow, and it took more
> time.
I've made an ocaml 3.07 -2 package which contains Mauny's patch and
seems not to have the ca
> Attached a "human" version of the patch that can be applied with "patch
> -p0" as usual to the root ocaml source directory. I'm rebuilding right
> now ocaml with that patch to see if it works ...
Hh. There are at least three changes in this patch:
1) the bug fix (OK)
2) error messages im
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 01:27:33PM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> Quoting Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
> > > No I didn't. I had to deal with a hardware failure. Either my IDE
> > controler
> > > or my hard drive died.
> >
> > Well, that sucks ... I hope it is not your harddisk, altough th
Quoting Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Hopefully, I have a laptop :P
>
> Well, hardware can be changed, and with luck yours is still under
> warranty, but nothing is going to give you back the data on the
> harddrive.
I had time to save my config files and some ongoing work. But I'm
usual
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 11:32:53AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> Mmm, yes, sure i could do that, we have made no progress on removing
> the need for it, right, so this would make sense, i think.
BTW1: please keep us informed of this change, I have a package that
depend on ocaml sources and I would l
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 01:13:44PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 12:27:53PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Well, i have it also, it was quite easy, but since i was also
> > downloading the RotK trailer, my link was quite slow, and it took more
> > time.
>
> I've made an
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 02:02:32PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 11:32:53AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Mmm, yes, sure i could do that, we have made no progress on removing
> > the need for it, right, so this would make sense, i think.
>
> BTW1: please keep us inform
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 02:09:44PM +0200, Claudio Sacerdoti Coen wrote:
> Let's hope that the patch doesn't introduce yet another error ;-)
The patch have been posted to the ocaml ML, so I'm just waiting for
feedback about it ...
As an insignificant regression testing I've just rebuilt a lot
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 01:13:44PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 12:27:53PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Well, i have it also, it was quite easy, but since i was also
> > downloading the RotK trailer, my link was quite slow, and it took more
> > time.
>
> I've made an
On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 10:54:46PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> Ok, i uploaded the ocaml 3.07 packages to
> deb http://people.debian.org/~luther/ocaml ./
Here:
http://bononia.it/zack/ocaml/
you will find both debian sources and powerpc binary packages of the
following: camlidl, findlib, fort, g
Quoting Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Ok, i am currently uploading it :
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/debian/ocaml/3.07$ dpkg -c ocaml-source_3.07-1_all.deb
> drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2003-10-01 14:12:52 ./
> drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2003-10-01 14:12:41 ./usr/
> drwxr-xr-x root/root
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 02:39:50PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Sven, could you please review it and move it to your repository if it's
> > ok?
> No, i prefer to upload my version, and keep the version at -1 (ideally
> -0.1 should be better though). I will look at your version and see if
> you hav
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 02:58:52PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 10:54:46PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Ok, i uploaded the ocaml 3.07 packages to
> > deb http://people.debian.org/~luther/ocaml ./
>
> Here:
>
> http://bononia.it/zack/ocaml/
>
> you will find both
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 02:46:00PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> And ocaml-source.tar.bz2 unpacks into ocaml/ocaml-3.07 ... Mmm, this
> is not nice, i suppose that just ocaml or just ocaml-3.07, maybe the
> latest would have been better, i will fix it.
IMO is better to leave "ocaml/ocaml-3.07" as it
Hello,
It seems that of the 5 remaining ocaml bugs, 205391 (manpage conflict)
is fixed, but 211190 (printer in ocamldebug) is not, nor is 183936
(whatis manpage stuff), nor are the 2 wishlist bugs.
I remember some discussion about this whatis issue, but can't find it
back. Do anyone remember some
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 03:16:39PM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> Quoting Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > Ok, i am currently uploading it :
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/debian/ocaml/3.07$ dpkg -c ocaml-source_3.07-1_all.deb
> > drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2003-10-01 14:12:52 ./
> > drwxr-
Quoting Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Hmm you could have kept the version in the file name, it is less
> > confusing. And why doesn't it simply unpacks into ocaml-3.07/ directly?
>
> Ok, i will add that.
>
> So for everyone, ocaml-source (>= 3.07) will install
> ocaml-source-3.07.tar.bz2
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 03:29:42PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 02:46:00PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > And ocaml-source.tar.bz2 unpacks into ocaml/ocaml-3.07 ... Mmm, this
> > is not nice, i suppose that just ocaml or just ocaml-3.07, maybe the
> > latest would have
On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 10:54:46PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 02:58:39PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> > Ocaml 3.07 is out, what about debian packages.
>
> Ok, i uploaded the ocaml 3.07 packages to
>
> deb http://people.debian.org/~luther/ocaml ./
>
> As said, i wil
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 02:58:52PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 10:54:46PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Ok, i uploaded the ocaml 3.07 packages to
> > deb http://people.debian.org/~luther/ocaml ./
>
> Here:
>
> http://bononia.it/zack/ocaml/
>
> you will find both
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 03:56:03PM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> Quoting Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
> > > Hmm you could have kept the version in the file name, it is less
> > > confusing. And why doesn't it simply unpacks into ocaml-3.07/ directly?
> >
> > Ok, i will add that.
> >
> >
> > Regarding my packages the only that is missing (if I'm not wrong) is
> > lablgtkmathview because I'm waiting for lablgl and lablgtk.
>
> Just uploaded lablgl 0.99-16, but i guess you need lablgtk too. Do you
> need lablgtk1 or lablgtk2 ?
He needs lablgtk1.
--
--
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 04:33:14PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 02:58:52PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 10:54:46PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > Ok, i uploaded the ocaml 3.07 packages to
> > > deb http://people.debian.org/~luther/ocaml ./
> >
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 04:33:14PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> Just uploaded lablgl 0.99-16, but i guess you need lablgtk too. Do you
> need lablgtk1 or lablgtk2 ?
Ehm both :-)
Please also check that lablgl install its META file (try "ocamlfind
query lablgl").
Many thanks.
Cheers.
--
Ste
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 04:07:07PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> I now have :
> $ ls <= This is the cleanly unpacked upstream source
> $ ls <= This is the ocaml-source tarball.
Ok
> You don't need the .depend though, do you ? If you really need them, i
> can add them again.
Yes, I need it. More g
Quoting Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Do you confirm this is the same scheme as for the kernels?
>
> Yep :
>
> $ dpkg -L kernel-source-2.4.22
> /.
> /usr
> /usr/src
> /usr/src/kernel-source-2.4.22.tar.bz2
> ...
> $ tar tjvf /usr/src/kernel-source-2.4.22.tar.bz2
> drwxr-xr-x root/root
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 05:03:09PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 04:33:14PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Just uploaded lablgl 0.99-16, but i guess you need lablgtk too. Do you
> > need lablgtk1 or lablgtk2 ?
>
> Ehm both :-)
>
> Please also check that lablgl ins
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 05:07:40PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 04:07:07PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > I now have :
> > $ ls <= This is the cleanly unpacked upstream source
> > $ ls <= This is the ocaml-source tarball.
>
> Ok
Mmm.
> > You don't need the .depend t
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 04:46:37PM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> Quoting Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > > Do you confirm this is the same scheme as for the kernels?
> >
> > Yep :
> >
> > $ dpkg -L kernel-source-2.4.22
> > /.
> > /usr
> > /usr/src
> > /usr/src/kernel-source-2.4.22.tar.bz2
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 05:26:04PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 05:03:09PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 04:33:14PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > Just uploaded lablgl 0.99-16, but i guess you need lablgtk too. Do you
> > > need lablgtk1 or lab
Hi,
in fact, Cameleon does not compile with ocaml 3.07, because of a camlp4 bug :-(
The current CVS is needed (in fact I think it works with the fixes in camlp4
that were made just after the 3.07 release).
What version of ocaml will be 3.07 in debian ? the release of the release + the
patches to c
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 05:19:53PM +0200, Claudio Sacerdoti Coen wrote:
> > Just uploaded lablgl 0.99-16, but i guess you need lablgtk too. Do you
> > need lablgtk1 or lablgtk2 ?
> He needs lablgtk1.
Not only: I would also like to create the new lablgtk2mathview ...
--
Stefano Zacchiroli -- M
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 05:26:57PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Yes, I need it. More generally: they are in the ocaml tarball and IMO
> What for ?
> > they sould be in the sources unpacked under /usr/src.
> They should not be in the ocaml tarball in the first place.
The point is that ocaml tarbal
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 06:03:08PM +0200, Maxence Guesdon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> in fact, Cameleon does not compile with ocaml 3.07, because of a camlp4 bug :-(
> The current CVS is needed (in fact I think it works with the fixes in camlp4
> that were made just after the 3.07 release).
You can download
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 06:21:54PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 05:19:53PM +0200, Claudio Sacerdoti Coen wrote:
> > > Just uploaded lablgl 0.99-16, but i guess you need lablgtk too. Do you
> > > need lablgtk1 or lablgtk2 ?
> > He needs lablgtk1.
>
> Not only: I would
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 06:24:20PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 05:26:57PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > Yes, I need it. More generally: they are in the ocaml tarball and IMO
> > What for ?
> > > they sould be in the sources unpacked under /usr/src.
> > They should n
On Wed, 1 Oct 2003 18:28:24 +0200
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 06:03:08PM +0200, Maxence Guesdon wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > in fact, Cameleon does not compile with ocaml 3.07, because of a camlp4 bug
> > :-( The current CVS is needed (in fact I think it works with
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 07:23:10PM +0200, Maxence Guesdon wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Oct 2003 18:28:24 +0200
> Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 06:03:08PM +0200, Maxence Guesdon wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > in fact, Cameleon does not compile with ocaml 3.07, because of
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 07:47:49PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 07:23:10PM +0200, Maxence Guesdon wrote:
> > On Wed, 1 Oct 2003 18:28:24 +0200
> > Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 06:03:08PM +0200, Maxence Guesdon wrote:
> > > > Hi,
>
Hello,
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 09:11:40AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 08:49:45AM +0200, Maxence Guesdon wrote:
> > > I think maxence could agree to do a release for 3.07, but it won't be a
> > > major release ( regarding the effort made for the port to lablgtk2 ).
> >
> >
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 05:26:04PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> want to keep it). And yes, the META file is there, the problem was that
> i copied it to the lablGL directory, but this directory did not yet
> exist, as i created the symlink only later. Fixed now.
Yes, it fixed and even more: now the
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 07:07:56PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> Both are available anyway.
There's a missing build-dependency on "libgnomecanvas2-dev" in the
lablgtk2 package.
Cheers.
--
Stefano Zacchiroli -- Master in Computer Science @ Uni. Bologna, Italy
[EMAIL PROTECTED],debian.org,bononia
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 03:30:17PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> It seems that of the 5 remaining ocaml bugs, 205391 (manpage conflict)
> is fixed, but 211190 (printer in ocamldebug) is not, nor is 183936
> (whatis manpage stuff), nor are the 2 wishlist bugs.
>
> I remember some discussion about th
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 03:30:17PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> nor are the 2 wishlist bugs.
Did you forward them to upstream? There is no mention about this in
the BTS.
-Ralf.
--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 04:19:27PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> It will thus enter testing with ocaml in this evenings dinstall run,
> which should be around 22h. I can make the ocaml 3.07 upload after that,
> or maybe tomorrow morning.
I'm just rebuilding the latest version of ocaml-3.07, and get
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 09:48:41PM +0200, Ralf Treinen wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 03:30:17PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> > nor are the 2 wishlist bugs.
>
> Did you forward them to upstream? There is no mention about this in
> the BTS.
I think yes, i tagged them upstream, so i must have.
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 09:15:11PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 05:26:04PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > want to keep it). And yes, the META file is there, the problem was that
> > i copied it to the lablGL directory, but this directory did not yet
> > exist, as i crea
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 09:18:21PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 07:07:56PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Both are available anyway.
>
> There's a missing build-dependency on "libgnomecanvas2-dev" in the
> lablgtk2 package.
Thanks, added.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 10:11:42PM +0200, Ralf Treinen wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 04:19:27PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> > It will thus enter testing with ocaml in this evenings dinstall run,
> > which should be around 22h. I can make the ocaml 3.07 upload after that,
> > or maybe tomorrow
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2003 13:31:23 +0200
Source: ocaml
Binary: ocaml-base ocaml ocaml-source ocaml-native-compilers
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 3.07-1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED
Quoting Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Format: 1.7
> Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2003 13:31:23 +0200
> Source: ocaml
> Binary: ocaml-base ocaml ocaml-source ocaml-native-compilers
> Architecture: source i386 all
> Version: 3.07-1
> Distribution: exper
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 11:27:47PM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> Quoting Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > Format: 1.7
> > Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2003 13:31:23 +0200
> > Source: ocaml
> > Binary: ocaml-base ocaml ocaml-source ocaml-native-
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 12:37:50AM +0200, Sylvain LE GALL wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 11:02:07PM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> > Quoting Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > > > Releasing the CVS version of cameleon is out of question anyway.
> > >
> > > So we either ship old version of
Hi,
> On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 11:02:07PM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> > Quoting Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > > > Releasing the CVS version of cameleon is out of question anyway.
> > >
> > > So we either ship old version of cameleon or don't ship it, if the new
> > > cameleon is not
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 08:49:45AM +0200, Maxence Guesdon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 11:02:07PM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> > > Quoting Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > >
> > > > > Releasing the CVS version of cameleon is out of question anyway.
> > > >
> > > > So we either
[Please stop CC'ing me on reply. I'm reading the list so I don't
need to receive messages two. I can give lessons about how to
use Mutt properly to avoid this! ]
Quoting Sylvain LE GALL <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Today, cameleon compile on 3.07. But there is no release...
>
> I think maxence could
Quoting Maxence Guesdon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Ok, I will make a release of Cameleon for ocaml 3.07. I think I'll do it
> on friday. This release should be as stable (or even more) than the previous
> one, since it is mainly a bug fix release.
Don't hurry. I do not intend to release it in Debian
Quoting Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Don't hurry. I do not intend to release it in Debian sarge anyway.
> > I'd perfer to release a older but working cameleon than a new and
> > not so well tested new one.
>
> Erm, Maxence is speaking about a bugfix release of the labgtk1 cameleon,
> not
Hi,
I think it is Ok now, right?
- Forwarded message from Jacques Garrigue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2003 09:04:42 +0900
From: Jacques Garrigue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Jacques Garrigue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] ocaml 3.07 and optional argum
On Wed, 1 Oct 2003 09:41:10 +0200
Jérôme Marant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> [Please stop CC'ing me on reply. I'm reading the list so I don't
> need to receive messages two. I can give lessons about how to
> use Mutt properly to avoid this! ]
>
> Quoting Sylvain LE GALL <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
Quoting Maxence Guesdon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> This is a *stable* version. The unstable version is the lablgtk2 branch
> of the CVS.
>
> > Furthermore, we don't have to bother Maxence with Debian timeframes.
>
> Making a release is not a lot of work for cameleon.
OK, I see. Thanks for taking
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 09:57:32AM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> Quoting Maxence Guesdon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
> > Ok, I will make a release of Cameleon for ocaml 3.07. I think I'll do it
> > on friday. This release should be as stable (or even more) than the previous
> > one, since it is main
Hello all,
This has been fixed now, so we can safely upload the package.
I am a bit baffled about why 3.06-21 didn't make it to testing this
night, but maybe they need another night. I will delay the ocaml 3.07-1
upload upto tomorrow then, so we can have one more round of testing
before i do this
Hi,
How about ocaml-source containing the Ocaml source as a tarball
/usr/src/ocaml-source-3.07.tar.gz or .tar.bz2 rather than an
unpacked source? Kernel-source packages are made like this.
Cheers,
--
Jérôme Marant
Hi,
How about ocaml-source containing the Ocaml source as a tarball
/usr/src/ocaml-source-3.07.tar.gz or .tar.bz2 rather than an
unpacked source? Kernel-source packages are made like this.
Cheers,
--
Jérôme Marant
Jérôme Marant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> How about ocaml-source containing the Ocaml source as a tarball
> /usr/src/ocaml-source-3.07.tar.gz or .tar.bz2 rather than an
> unpacked source? Kernel-source packages are made like this.
Seem a good idea to me.
--
Rémi Vanicat
[EMAIL PROTECT
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 10:56:45AM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> Hi,
>
> How about ocaml-source containing the Ocaml source as a tarball
> /usr/src/ocaml-source-3.07.tar.gz or .tar.bz2 rather than an
> unpacked source? Kernel-source packages are made like this.
It must be a real important suggest
This is the patch that fix the bug directly from Michel Mauny (forwarded
here for the records).
I suggest to add it to the ocaml 3.07 package.
Cheers.
- Forwarded message from Jacques Garrigue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2003 09:04:42 +0900
From: Jacques Garrigue <[EMAIL PRO
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 10:56:45AM +0200, J?r?me Marant wrote:
> How about ocaml-source containing the Ocaml source as a tarball
> /usr/src/ocaml-source-3.07.tar.gz or .tar.bz2 rather than an unpacked
> source? Kernel-source packages are made like this.
I completely agree.
--
Stefano Zacchiroli
On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 08:03:18PM +0200, Ralf Treinen wrote:
> > I will upload the packages to my private repostory today though, so
> > everyone can already start building for it.
> Can you please recall the location of your private repository - or
> even better upload your package to alioth?
Quoting Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 10:56:45AM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > How about ocaml-source containing the Ocaml source as a tarball
> > /usr/src/ocaml-source-3.07.tar.gz or .tar.bz2 rather than an
> > unpacked source? Kernel-source packages ar
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 11:41:40AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> This is the patch that fix the bug directly from Michel Mauny (forwarded
> here for the records).
Yep, but it is unappliable. I am trying to get a clean unidiff patch out
of CVSright now.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
[ Cc: for the sake of rapidity ]
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 12:03:41PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > This is the patch that fix the bug directly from Michel Mauny (forwarded
> > here for the records).
> Yep, but it is unappliable. I am trying to get a clean unidiff patch
> out of CVSright now.
Stop!
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 12:23:23PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> [ Cc: for the sake of rapidity ]
>
> On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 12:03:41PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > This is the patch that fix the bug directly from Michel Mauny (forwarded
> > > here for the records).
> > Yep, but it is una
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 11:53:06AM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> Quoting Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 10:56:45AM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > How about ocaml-source containing the Ocaml source as a tarball
> > > /usr/src/ocaml-source-3.07.tar
1 - 100 of 154 matches
Mail list logo
