ocaml 3.08 package pool seems to be blocked by lablgl, which was not retried since 21 of july or something such.

Hello ia64 buildd maintainers, The following ocaml 3.08 packages have not yet been built on ia64, and are thus blocking the ocaml 3.08 transition into testing, and also have some influence on the tiff 4 migration : camlimages is not yet built on ia64: 2.12-2 vs 2.12-6 cameleon is not yet buil

irc chat about the freeze dates and the current ocaml situation.

Here is a little chat with vorlon (Steve Langasek), one of the two RMs. It should clarify some of the stuff we worry about, and will bring the buildd situation a bit further. I thought i would share it with you all. Friendly, Sven Luther 10:19 -!- vorlon [EMAIL PROTECTED] has joined #debian-ocam

NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge.

Hello, Ok, find attached the new ocaml licence proposal, which will go into the ocaml 3.08.1 release, which is scheduled for inclusion in sarge. As said previously, it fixes the clause of venue problem, and the clause QPL 6c problem. The problems concerning QPL 3 remain, but consensus about it h

Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge.

Sven Luther wrote: Ok, find attached the new ocaml licence proposal, which will go into the ocaml 3.08.1 release, which is scheduled for inclusion in sarge. I would only offer one small piece of feedback, and that is that the license for "The Compiler" is described as the QPL version 1.0, while I

Re: ocaml 3.08 package pool seems to be blocked by lablgl, which was not retried since 21 of july or something such.

On 10/08/2004-10:47, Sven Luther wrote: > Hello ia64 buildd maintainers, > > The following ocaml 3.08 packages have not yet been built on ia64, and are > thus blocking the ocaml 3.08 transition into testing, and also have some > influence on the tiff 4 migration : > > camlimages is not yet bui

Bug#264797: advi: man page missing

Package: advi Version: 1.5.2+cvs-2004.07.27-2 Severity: normal /usr/share/man/man1/advi.1.gz seems to have gone missing in violation of Policy 12.1; as a result, /usr/share/man/man1/advi.bin.1.gz is now a dangling symlink. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT po

ocaml related packages in Dep-Wait on m68k

Hello m68k buildd maintainers, from http://www.buildd.net/buildd/m68k_Dep-Wait.html, it seems that some packages should be put in Needs-build manually: ocaml-3.07 [_ []] lablgtk_1.2.7-1 [buildd_m68k-kiivi] lablgtk2_2.4.0-2 [buildd_m68k-kiivi] ocamldbi_0.9.

Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge.

On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 07:43:06AM -0400, Joe Moore wrote: > Sven Luther wrote: > >Ok, find attached the new ocaml licence proposal, which will go into the > >ocaml > >3.08.1 release, which is scheduled for inclusion in sarge. > > I would only offer one small piece of feedback, and that is that t

Re: ocaml related packages in Dep-Wait on m68k

On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 02:47:31PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > Hello m68k buildd maintainers, > > from http://www.buildd.net/buildd/m68k_Dep-Wait.html, it seems that some > packages should be put in Needs-build manually: > ocaml-3.07 [_ []] > lablgtk_1.2.7-1 [buildd_m68k-kiivi]

camlimages_2.12-6 should be put in Needs-Build on hppa

Hello hppa buildd maintainers, according to http://www.buildd.net/buildd/hppa_Dep-Wait.html, it seems that camlimages should be manually put from Dep-Wait to Needs-Build: it is currently waiting for the nonexistent package "rpath", which is a spurious build-dep and has been removed from the cont

Re: ocaml related packages in Dep-Wait on m68k

On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 02:47:31PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > Could you set lablgtk, lablgtk2, ocamldbi and camlimages to Needs-build? > Thanks in advance. Done. -- Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right! <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> signature.asc Description: Digital

Bug#264797: advi: man page missing

On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 08:24:54AM -0400, Aaron M. Ucko wrote: > Package: advi > Version: 1.5.2+cvs-2004.07.27-2 > Severity: normal > > /usr/share/man/man1/advi.1.gz seems to have gone missing in violation > of Policy 12.1; as a result, /usr/share/man/man1/advi.bin.1.gz is now > a dangling symlink

Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge.

Sven Luther said: > > No, the QPL itself is non-free, and doesn't allow for modification, which > is > why we chose to use the pure QPL, and then the special exception. > > The choice of law clause is allowed to be modified though by Trolltech, so > it > is less problematic. Ok, one "apt-get insta

Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge.

On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 09:41:51AM -0500, Joe Moore wrote: > Sven Luther said: > > > > No, the QPL itself is non-free, and doesn't allow for modification, which > > is > > why we chose to use the pure QPL, and then the special exception. > > > > The choice of law clause is allowed to be modified th

Re: ocaml related packages in Dep-Wait on m68k

Julien Cristau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hello m68k buildd maintainers, > > from http://www.buildd.net/buildd/m68k_Dep-Wait.html, it seems that some > packages should be put in Needs-build manually: > ocaml-3.07 [_ []] > lablgtk_1.2.7-1 [buildd_m68k-kiivi] > lablgtk2_2

Re: Bug#264859: FTBFS: Reference to undefined global `Postgres'

Richard, any hints on this? Goswin, what versions of the following packages do you have: ocaml-nox libpostgresql-ocaml-dev libpgsql-ocaml-dev Thanks, John On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 07:43:36PM +0200, Goswin Brederlow wrote: > Package: ocamldbi > Version: 0.9.9-1 > Severity: serious > Justification

Re: Bug#264859: FTBFS: Reference to undefined global `Postgres'

On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 01:06:14PM -0500, John Goerzen wrote: > Richard, any hints on this? > > Goswin, what versions of the following packages do you have: > > ocaml-nox > libpostgresql-ocaml-dev > libpgsql-ocaml-dev > > ocamlc -g -I /usr/lib/ocaml/3.08/pcre -I /usr/lib/ocaml/3.08/postgres -I >

Re: Bug#264859: FTBFS: Reference to undefined global `Postgres'

On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 07:11:05PM +0100, Richard Jones wrote: > On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 01:06:14PM -0500, John Goerzen wrote: > > Richard, any hints on this? > > > > Goswin, what versions of the following packages do you have: > > > > ocaml-nox > > libpostgresql-ocaml-dev > > libpgsql-ocaml-dev

Re: ocaml related packages in Dep-Wait on m68k

On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 07:58:57PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > Julien Cristau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Hello m68k buildd maintainers, > > > > from http://www.buildd.net/buildd/m68k_Dep-Wait.html, it seems that some > > packages should be put in Needs-build manually: > > ocam

Re: Bug#264859: FTBFS: Reference to undefined global `Postgres'

Goswin, I just tried to build this on my alpha, and it's un-buildable because ocamlodbc isn't in the archive in the proper version yet. Are you sure the build-deps were met? On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 07:11:05PM +0100, Richard Jones wrote: > On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 01:06:14PM -0500, John Goerzen wr

Re: Bug#264859: FTBFS: Reference to undefined global `Postgres'

On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 01:15:13PM -0500, John Goerzen wrote: > On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 07:11:05PM +0100, Richard Jones wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 01:06:14PM -0500, John Goerzen wrote: > > > Richard, any hints on this? > > > > > > Goswin, what versions of the following packages do you have

Re: Bug#264859: FTBFS: Reference to undefined global `Postgres'

John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 07:11:05PM +0100, Richard Jones wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 01:06:14PM -0500, John Goerzen wrote: >> > Richard, any hints on this? >> > >> > Goswin, what versions of the following packages do you have: >> > >> > ocaml-nox >

Re: ocaml related packages in Dep-Wait on m68k

Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 07:58:57PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: >> Julien Cristau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> > Hello m68k buildd maintainers, >> > >> > from http://www.buildd.net/buildd/m68k_Dep-Wait.html, it seems that some >> > packages sh

Re: Bug#264859: FTBFS: Reference to undefined global `Postgres'

Hi, >> Error while linking dbi_postgres.cmo: >> Reference to undefined global `Postgres' >> make[1]: *** [dbi_postgres.cmo] Error 2 >> make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/mrvn/ocamldbi/ocamldbi-0.9.9' >> make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2 same error on mipsel. Same solution probably too. MfG

software

Microsoft SQL Server 2000 Enterprise Edition - 200 Adobe Acrobat 6.0 Professional - 100 Adobe Acrobat 6.0 Professional - 100 Adobe Acrobat 6.0 Professional - 100 Macromedia Studio MX 2004 - 180 Adobe PageMaker 7.0 - 60 Adobe Illustrator CS - 90 Adobe Illustrator 10 - 80 Quark Express 6.0 - 60 A

Re: Bug#264859: FTBFS: Reference to undefined global `Postgres'

Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 07:11:05PM +0100, Richard Jones wrote: >>> On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 01:06:14PM -0500, John Goerzen wrote: ... >>> > > ocamlc -g -I /usr/lib/ocaml/3.08/pcre -I /usr/lib/ocaml/3.08

Re: NEW ocaml licence proposal by upstream, will be part of the 3.08.1 release going into sarge.

Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > Ok, find attached the new ocaml licence proposal, which will go into > the ocaml 3.08.1 release, which is scheduled for inclusion in sarge. > As said previously, it fixes the clause of venue problem, and the > clause QPL 6c problem. Great! > Th

RFS mldonkey

Hello, Since my usual sponsor is in holiday, i come to ask you for an upload. As i have told the #debian-ocaml-maint last time, i have packaged the latest version of mldonkey ( 2.5.27 ). I commited it in the svn last night. Thank you in advance for the upload Kind regard Sylvain Le Gall -- To