On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 07:07:19AM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
Quoting Samuel Mimram ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
De plus, le package ira dans la section non-free de Debian, sauf si vous
choisissez une licence libre pour cette doc (la licence ci-dessus ne
l'est pas).
Maybe explaining
Dear Samuel,
I talked with Hugo a few days back about it. It was not done yet just
because we do not know what is the licence that would better fit the debian
packagers. From the answer of Sven I am a bit confused: is the suggestion
of Samuel (grabbing sentences from the ocaml manual
On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 10:58:05AM +0100, Claudio Sacerdoti Coen wrote:
I talked with Hugo a few days back about it. It was not done yet just
because we do not know what is the licence that would better fit the debian
packagers. From the answer of Sven I am a bit confused: is the suggestion
Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 10:58:05AM +0100, Claudio Sacerdoti Coen wrote:
I talked with Hugo a few days back about it. It was not done yet just
because we do not know what is the licence that would better fit the debian
packagers. From the answer of Sven I am a bit
Samuel Mimram wrote:
GFDL is ok, but only for the next release, so I suggest not to use it.
Ah? I thought the consensus was more like GFDL is not acceptable for
Debian, maily because of the reasons explained in [1] but I might have
missed something.
Oops sorry, I read from the next release.
Sam.
Order Number: 633721
Order Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 17:06:16 +0400
We appreciate your patience in the processing of your
m o rrtgage request.
We have prepared 3.4% deal for you at this time. Verify
your information so we can proceed as planned.
http://www.xpojga.com/
Thank you.
Sincerely,
On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 10:58:05AM +0100, Claudio Sacerdoti Coen wrote:
Dear Samuel,
I talked with Hugo a few days back about it. It was not done yet just
because we do not know what is the licence that would better fit the debian
packagers. From the answer of Sven I am a bit confused:
On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 12:27:52PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 10:58:05AM +0100, Claudio Sacerdoti Coen wrote:
I talked with Hugo a few days back about it. It was not done yet just
because we do not know what is the licence that would better fit the debian
8 matches
Mail list logo
