Package: ocaml-tools
Version: 2006.05.15-1
Severity: important
The current version of omlet sets efm to a new value forgetting the
previous one. As a result vim does no longer jump to the error location
when make is issued. This behaviour can be reproduced with ocaml-tools
2006.05.15-1.
Your
On Sat, Nov 11, 2006 at 10:09:38AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
I just used approx to help me doing test installation with d-i.
During this, there are 3 features, which i think may be useful :
- ability to have approx take packages from more than one archive to put
them in the same
Package: advi
Version: 1.6.0-10
Severity: serious
Justification: FHS violation
According to the Debian Policy as well as the etch release policy (5 c
in the latter document), packages are RC if they do not follow the FHS.
advi installs architecture-independent TeX input files in
/usr/lib/advi.
Package: advi
Severity: important
After installing advi, no documenation is available. The reason is that
the manual.pdf is hidden in the advi-examples package. The easiest fix
is probably to rename advi-examples to advi-doc.
Regards, Frank
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT
tags 398695 patch
tags 398922 patch
tags 398920 patch
thanks
Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This bug is very strange: It's easily reproducible with pbuilder, even
if I log into the chroot and build manually with dpkg-buildpackage.
However, if I call the Makefile targets manually, the
Frank Küster wrote:
After installing advi, no documenation is available. The reason is that
the manual.pdf is hidden in the advi-examples package. The easiest fix
is probably to rename advi-examples to advi-doc.
...or simply to have a notice about this in README.Debian which would
avoid the
Samuel Mimram [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Frank Küster wrote:
After installing advi, no documenation is available. The reason is that
the manual.pdf is hidden in the advi-examples package. The easiest fix
is probably to rename advi-examples to advi-doc.
...or simply to have a notice about
Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Attached is a patch that would fixe the three bugs that receive this
report.
Sorry, there was an error in the patch. I hate dpatch, or it hates me.
Here's the correct version,
Regards, Frank
diff -Nur advi-1.6.0.old/debian/advi-doc.examples
On Thu, Nov 16, 2006 at 10:40:42AM -0500, Eric Cooper wrote:
On Sat, Nov 11, 2006 at 10:09:38AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
I just used approx to help me doing test installation with d-i.
During this, there are 3 features, which i think may be useful :
- ability to have approx take
Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Samuel Mimram [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Frank Küster wrote:
After installing advi, no documenation is available. The reason is that
the manual.pdf is hidden in the advi-examples package. The easiest fix
is probably to rename advi-examples to advi-doc.
severity 398922 important
thanks
On Thu, Nov 16, 2006 at 04:39:48PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
According to the Debian Policy as well as the etch release policy (5 c
in the latter document), packages are RC if they do not follow the FHS.
advi installs architecture-independent TeX input files
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 398922 important
Bug#398922: advi: Installs arch-independent files in /usr/lib
Severity set to `important' from `serious'
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This particular kind of FHS violation (arch-indep code in arch-dep
directory) is not generally RC, because there are no significant functional
problems as a result of mis-identifying files as arch-dependent that aren't.
Then please clarify this in the
13 matches
Mail list logo
