On 13-01-2008, Stefano Zacchiroli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Please remove from the alpha, arm, and ia64 architectures the
ocaml-native-compilers binary package: the OCaml native code compiler no
longer generates codes on such architectures. The
On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 10:02:02AM +, Sylvain Le Gall wrote:
I am maintaining this package and i don't see how it depends on
ocaml-native-compilers.
It doesn't indeed, but looking at the Architecture: lines of your
package I was presuming it had binary packages which needed the
On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 11:44:11 +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
Then, out of curiosity, why you have long Architecture: line for
ocamlgsl?
According to Packages-arch-specific:
%ocamlgsl: !hppa !sparc # [ANAIS] upstream and alignment issues
Cheers,
Julien
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
Package: ocaml-findlib
Version: 1.2.1-2
Severity: wishlist
Hello,
I was looking for ocamlfind, and apt-cache search ocamlfind wasn't
helpful. The description of the package should probably have ocamlfind
somewhere in it for that search to succeed.
Samuel
-- System Information:
Debian Release:
On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 01:04:33PM +, Samuel Thibault wrote:
I was looking for ocamlfind, and apt-cache search ocamlfind wasn't
helpful. The description of the package should probably have ocamlfind
somewhere in it for that search to succeed.
I've fixed this in the current development
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.13
package findlib ocaml-findlib
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: ocaml-findlib findlib
tags 460669 + pending
Bug#460669: apt-cache search ocamlfind doesn't find ocaml-findlib
There were
Stefano Zacchiroli, le Mon 14 Jan 2008 15:43:21 +0100, a écrit :
On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 01:04:33PM +, Samuel Thibault wrote:
I was looking for ocamlfind, and apt-cache search ocamlfind wasn't
helpful. The description of the package should probably have ocamlfind
somewhere in it for
Hello,
On 14-01-2008, Julien Cristau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 11:44:11 +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
Then, out of curiosity, why you have long Architecture: line for
ocamlgsl?
According to Packages-arch-specific:
%ocamlgsl: !hppa !sparc # [ANAIS]
Package: ocaml
Severity: wishlist
There's a new version (3.10.1) as for January 2008. This version fix a
segmentation fault on amd64 for mldonkey on certain situations and also
fix several bugs as describe the Changes file.
Please consider packaging this new version and let me know if I can help
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from unstable:
ocaml-native-compilers | 3.10.0-8 | alpha, arm, ia64
Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag
database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a
FYI: The status of the cryptgps source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 0.2.1-3
Current version: 0.2.1-4
--
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.
FYI: The status of the calendar source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 1.10-2
Current version: 1.10-3
--
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.
--
FYI: The status of the pxp source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 1.2.0~test1-2
Current version: 1.2.0~test1-3
--
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more
13 matches
Mail list logo
