Accepted:
libsoundtouch-ocaml-dev_0.1.3-1_amd64.deb
to pool/main/o/ocaml-soundtouch/libsoundtouch-ocaml-dev_0.1.3-1_amd64.deb
libsoundtouch-ocaml_0.1.3-1_amd64.deb
to pool/main/o/ocaml-soundtouch/libsoundtouch-ocaml_0.1.3-1_amd64.deb
ocaml-soundtouch_0.1.3-1.diff.gz
to
ocaml-soundtouch_0.1.4-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
ocaml-soundtouch_0.1.4-1.dsc
ocaml-soundtouch_0.1.4.orig.tar.gz
ocaml-soundtouch_0.1.4-1.diff.gz
libsoundtouch-ocaml_0.1.4-1_amd64.deb
libsoundtouch-ocaml-dev_0.1.4-1_amd64.deb
Greetings,
Accepted:
libsoundtouch-ocaml-dev_0.1.4-1_amd64.deb
to pool/main/o/ocaml-soundtouch/libsoundtouch-ocaml-dev_0.1.4-1_amd64.deb
libsoundtouch-ocaml_0.1.4-1_amd64.deb
to pool/main/o/ocaml-soundtouch/libsoundtouch-ocaml_0.1.4-1_amd64.deb
ocaml-soundtouch_0.1.4-1.diff.gz
to
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package ocaml
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# remote status report for #179254
# * http://caml.inria.fr/mantis/view.php?id=1710
# * remote status changed: (?) - acknowledged
# *
The problem is that the relevant lines are trying to create function
pointers, but the identifiers named are really macros.
The following example gives a similar error:
macroptr.c:
int f(int x, int y, int z) { return 0; }
#define FOO(x) f(x,0,0)
int (*p)() = f;
int (*q)() = FOO;
$ gcc
5 matches
Mail list logo