Re: ocaml 3.10.2 transition scheduled for next week

2008-05-12 Thread Romain Beauxis
Le Tuesday 13 May 2008 00:48:38 Romain Beauxis, vous avez écrit : > My opinion on this is that build dependencies for packages using both > ocaml-nox and other incompatible packages should be versioned for all of > them Humm.. This seems even worse: > <<< leaving recursion > ocaml-findlib: missing

Re: ocaml 3.10.2 transition scheduled for next week

2008-05-12 Thread Romain Beauxis
Le Monday 12 May 2008 16:01:43 Stefano Zacchiroli, vous avez écrit : > - ocaml (obviously) >   * here it should be a good idea to change the doc-base section for the >     documentation to the correct one: Ralf: can you do that (as you >     remember which one is correct :))? >   * Sylvain: can you

Debian OCaml Packaging Policy

2008-05-12 Thread Ralf Treinen
Hi, is there a specific reason why our packaging policy shouldn't be registered with doc-base in the section Debian? -Ralf. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#180087: marked as done (advi: minor display problem with attached file using Philip Hirschhorn's exam class)

2008-05-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 12 May 2008 16:57:12 -0400 (EDT) with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Re: Bug#180087: advi: t has caused the Debian Bug report #180087, regarding advi: minor display problem with attached file using Philip Hirschhorn's exam class to be marked as done. This

Re: ocaml 3.10.2 transition scheduled for next week

2008-05-12 Thread Ralf Treinen
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 07:15:23PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 02:57:18PM +, Sylvain Le Gall wrote: > > I am asking myself, if it is not the right time to split CDBS/policy > > stuff into ocaml-support package. > I'm against of doing that during the transition.

Re: ocaml 3.10.2 transition scheduled for next week

2008-05-12 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 02:57:18PM +, Sylvain Le Gall wrote: > I have already set Programming/OCaml for doc-base section in the > auto ocamldoc generator + template. Cool. > > * Sylvain: can you please commit the policy changes regarding camlp4 > > naming? > Yep. Tnx. > I am asking my

Re: ocaml 3.10.2 transition scheduled for next week

2008-05-12 Thread Sylvain Le Gall
On 12-05-2008, Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --qMm9M+Fa2AknHoGS > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > Content-Disposition: inline > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > As per subject, see below [1] for a quoted excerpt from #debian-qa (just > because Luk saw

Re: ocaml 3.10.2 transition scheduled for next week

2008-05-12 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 06:25:38PM +0200, Ralf Treinen wrote: > Let's go for Programming/OCaml. The cdbs class seems to have already the > right value. I will have a look at the packaging policy to see what > needs to be done there. Thanks a lot. > This means that all packaging that install ocaml

Re: ocaml 3.10.2 transition scheduled for next week

2008-05-12 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 05:44:29PM +0200, Samuel Mimram wrote: > There is a bugfix version of lablgtk2 which has been uploaded to > experimental. Maybe could we take advantage of the rebuild to switch to > this version? Your call, I've no objection in principle (though I hope this version will not

Re: ocaml 3.10.2 transition scheduled for next week

2008-05-12 Thread Ralf Treinen
Hi, On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 04:01:43PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > The idea is then to start doing sourceful uploads Sunday (better > Monday). Uploads should be done with a bit of care respecting build-dep Good! > order and delaying dependent packages by one day (using delayed queues). >

Re: ocaml 3.10.2 transition scheduled for next week

2008-05-12 Thread Samuel Mimram
Hi, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > Can we please in the meantime make a list of the packages requiring > sourceful uploads? There is a bugfix version of lablgtk2 which has been uploaded to experimental. Maybe could we take advantage of the rebuild to switch to this version? Cheers, Samuel. -- T

ocaml 3.10.2 transition scheduled for next week

2008-05-12 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
As per subject, see below [1] for a quoted excerpt from #debian-qa (just because Luk saw me there I guess). The idea is then to start doing sourceful uploads Sunday (better Monday). Uploads should be done with a bit of care respecting build-dep order and delaying dependent packages by one day (usi

Re: Git migration...

2008-05-12 Thread Sylvain Le Gall
On 12-05-2008, Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 09:24:02AM +, Sylvain Le Gall wrote: > > PS regarding "asking questions" I indeed liked the darcs default of >doing that. Git is lacking it, though in the most important cases you >have flags to trigg

Re: Git migration...

2008-05-12 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 09:24:02AM +, Sylvain Le Gall wrote: > Concerning the "waste of time", i disagree. Git is not the final SCM > around. There will be other. Understanding git, darcs, tla, cvs, svni, This was not the point of my "waste of time", no praise to git was intended. It is rather

Re: Git migration...

2008-05-12 Thread Pietro Abate
there is also this script that can make it easier to learn all the git commands... http://www.gnome.org/~newren/eg/ they say it's made for svn users... :) p On Sat, May 10, 2008 at 06:58:50PM +0200, Ralf Treinen wrote: > On Sat, May 10, 2008 at 06:46:25PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > > On

Re: Git migration...

2008-05-12 Thread Sylvain Le Gall
On 11-05-2008, Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --x+6KMIRAuhnl3hBn > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > Content-Disposition: inline > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 06:04:38PM +, Sylvain Le Gall wrote: >> I would better recomme