Bug#921812: mldonkey-server: Add systemd service file for better security

Hi Mehdi, Thank you for considering the patch. On 1/17/21 04:27, Mehdi Dogguy wrote: [...] I have a doubt about which systemd features to enable by default though. I can see thath Fedora/RedHat enabled really a few, as you can see in [1]. For this reason, I'll ask for advice from Michael (sys

Bug#921812: marked as done (mldonkey-server: Add systemd service file for better security)

Your message dated Mon, 06 Feb 2023 17:05:12 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1030690: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #921812, regarding mldonkey-server: Add systemd service file for better security to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#785666: marked as done (mldonkey-server: Starts OK but reports an error to systemd)

Your message dated Mon, 06 Feb 2023 17:05:12 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1030690: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #785666, regarding mldonkey-server: Starts OK but reports an error to systemd to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#1030690: Removed package(s) from unstable

Version: 3.1.7-2+rm Dear submitter, as the package mldonkey has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/1030690 The

Bug#1030690: Removed package(s) from unstable

We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: mldonkey |3.1.7-2 | source mldonkey-gui |3.1.7-2 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips64el, mipsel, ppc64el, s390x mldonkey-server |3.1.7-2 | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i

Bug#967632: marked as done (mldonkey: depends on deprecated GTK 2)

Your message dated Mon, 06 Feb 2023 17:05:12 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1030690: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #967632, regarding mldonkey: depends on deprecated GTK 2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dea

Bug#920466: marked as done (mldonkey-server: Init script fails to stop daemon properly)

Your message dated Mon, 06 Feb 2023 17:05:12 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1030690: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #920466, regarding mldonkey-server: Init script fails to stop daemon properly to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#972211: marked as done (FTBFS with OCaml 4.11.1 (-unsafe-string is not available))

Your message dated Mon, 06 Feb 2023 17:05:12 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1030690: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #972211, regarding FTBFS with OCaml 4.11.1 (-unsafe-string is not available) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#863524: marked as done (mldonkey-server: The Hyperlink "Clear all" is invalid on the web site interface of the mldonkey)

Your message dated Mon, 06 Feb 2023 17:05:12 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1030690: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #863524, regarding mldonkey-server: The Hyperlink "Clear all" is invalid on the web site interface of the mldonkey to be marked as don

Bug#694485: marked as done (Override the UL/DL ratio restriction)

Your message dated Mon, 06 Feb 2023 17:05:12 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1030690: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #694485, regarding Override the UL/DL ratio restriction to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been deal

Bug#641074: marked as done (Request URI gets too large submitting changes to a large transfer list)

Your message dated Mon, 06 Feb 2023 17:05:12 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1030690: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #641074, regarding Request URI gets too large submitting changes to a large transfer list to be marked as done. This means that you cl

Bug#639219: marked as done (receive notifications when files become available)

Your message dated Mon, 06 Feb 2023 17:05:12 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1030690: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #639219, regarding receive notifications when files become available to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#604907: marked as done (mldonkey-server: Stops with "Too many open files for directory open" message)

Your message dated Mon, 06 Feb 2023 17:05:12 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1030690: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #604907, regarding mldonkey-server: Stops with "Too many open files for directory open" message to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#676325: marked as done (Mldonkey-server with upnp support)

Your message dated Mon, 06 Feb 2023 17:05:12 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1030690: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #676325, regarding Mldonkey-server with upnp support to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt w

Bug#508444: marked as done (mldonkey-server: server config /var/lib/mldonkey should be in /etc/mldonkey)

Your message dated Mon, 06 Feb 2023 17:05:12 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1030690: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #508444, regarding mldonkey-server: server config /var/lib/mldonkey should be in /etc/mldonkey to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#506195: marked as done (/usr/bin/mlnet: consume too much power when idle (20 wakeups/second))

Your message dated Mon, 06 Feb 2023 17:05:12 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1030690: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #506195, regarding /usr/bin/mlnet: consume too much power when idle (20 wakeups/second) to be marked as done. This means that you clai

Bug#472763: marked as done (mldonkey-server: fails to refresh shared files list and keeps deleted file open)

Your message dated Mon, 06 Feb 2023 17:05:12 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1030690: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #472763, regarding mldonkey-server: fails to refresh shared files list and keeps deleted file open to be marked as done. This means t

Bug#593092: marked as done (mldonkey-server: local users are gone after upgrade to squeeze, must re-create)

Your message dated Mon, 06 Feb 2023 17:05:12 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1030690: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #593092, regarding mldonkey-server: local users are gone after upgrade to squeeze, must re-create to be marked as done. This means th

Bug#458924: marked as done (mldonkey-server: illegal instruction on vortex86 CPU)

Your message dated Mon, 06 Feb 2023 17:05:12 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1030690: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #458924, regarding mldonkey-server: illegal instruction on vortex86 CPU to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the probl

Bug#396855: marked as done (mlgui sluggish, affects all of X performance)

Your message dated Mon, 06 Feb 2023 17:05:12 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1030690: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #396855, regarding mlgui sluggish, affects all of X performance to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has b

Bug#503076: marked as done (mldonkey-server: Segfaults in mlnet.)

Your message dated Mon, 06 Feb 2023 17:05:12 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1030690: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #503076, regarding mldonkey-server: Segfaults in mlnet. to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been deal

Bug#422917: marked as done (hardly an error: loading language resource)

Your message dated Mon, 06 Feb 2023 17:05:12 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1030690: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #422917, regarding hardly an error: loading language resource to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has bee

Bug#396852: marked as done (does not play nice with xinerama at all)

Your message dated Mon, 06 Feb 2023 17:05:12 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1030690: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #396852, regarding does not play nice with xinerama at all to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been d

Bug#335472: marked as done (mldonkey-server: Does not understand DNAME dns records)

Your message dated Mon, 06 Feb 2023 17:05:12 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1030690: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #335472, regarding mldonkey-server: Does not understand DNAME dns records to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the pro

Bug#1027280: marked as done (mldonkey-server: mldonkey is missing from the repositories.)

Your message dated Mon, 06 Feb 2023 17:05:12 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1030690: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #1027280, regarding mldonkey-server: mldonkey is missing from the repositories. to be marked as done. This means that you claim that t

Bug#1010328: marked as done (mldonkey-server: Please replace mime-support with media-types in Depends)

Your message dated Mon, 06 Feb 2023 17:05:12 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1030690: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #1010328, regarding mldonkey-server: Please replace mime-support with media-types in Depends to be marked as done. This means that yo

Bug#1030690: RM: mldonkey -- ROM; dead upstream; FTBFS beyond repair

Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal User: ftp.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: remove X-Debbugs-Cc: mldon...@packages.debian.org, debian-ocaml-maint@lists.debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:mldonkey Dear FTP Team, The mldonkey package has been broken since October 2020 (#972211). T

otags_4.05.1-3_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Thank you for your contribution to Debian. Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2023 14:35:59 +0100 Source: otags Architecture: source Version: 4.05.1-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian OCaml Maintainers Changed-By: S

Processing of otags_4.05.1-3_source.changes

otags_4.05.1-3_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: otags_4.05.1-3.dsc otags_4.05.1-3.debian.tar.xz Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)

[Git][ocaml-team/otags] Pushed new tag debian/4.05.1-3

Stéphane Glondu pushed new tag debian/4.05.1-3 at Debian OCaml Maintainers / otags -- View it on GitLab: https://salsa.debian.org/ocaml-team/otags/-/tree/debian/4.05.1-3 You're receiving this email because of your account on salsa.debian.org.

[Git][ocaml-team/otags] Pushed new tag archive/debian/4.05.1-3

Stéphane Glondu pushed new tag archive/debian/4.05.1-3 at Debian OCaml Maintainers / otags -- View it on GitLab: https://salsa.debian.org/ocaml-team/otags/-/tree/archive/debian/4.05.1-3 You're receiving this email because of your account on salsa.debian.org.

Bug#1002940: marked as done (FTBFS with ocaml-migrate-parsetree 2.3.0)

Your message dated Mon, 06 Feb 2023 13:49:13 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1002940: fixed in otags 4.05.1-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #1002940, regarding FTBFS with ocaml-migrate-parsetree 2.3.0 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wi

ocaml-reins_0.1a-10_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Thank you for your contribution to Debian. Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2023 14:02:07 +0100 Source: ocaml-reins Architecture: source Version: 0.1a-10 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian OCaml Maintainers Changed-By:

Processed: Bug#1002940 marked as pending in otags

Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1002940 [src:otags] FTBFS with ocaml-migrate-parsetree 2.3.0 Added tag(s) pending. -- 1002940: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1002940 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#971176: marked as done (ocaml-reins: FTBFS: File config.omake: line 9, characters 10-29 unbound variable: this.OCAMLDEP_MODULES)

Your message dated Mon, 06 Feb 2023 13:35:50 + with message-id and subject line Bug#971176: fixed in ocaml-reins 0.1a-10 has caused the Debian Bug report #971176, regarding ocaml-reins: FTBFS: File config.omake: line 9, characters 10-29 unbound variable: this.OCAMLDEP_MODULES to be marked as

Bug#873237: marked as done (Updating the ocaml-reins Uploaders list)

Your message dated Mon, 06 Feb 2023 13:35:50 + with message-id and subject line Bug#873237: fixed in ocaml-reins 0.1a-10 has caused the Debian Bug report #873237, regarding Updating the ocaml-reins Uploaders list to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Processing of ocaml-reins_0.1a-10_source.changes

ocaml-reins_0.1a-10_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: ocaml-reins_0.1a-10.dsc ocaml-reins_0.1a-10.debian.tar.xz Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)

[Git][ocaml-team/ocaml-reins] Pushed new tag debian/0.1a-10

Stéphane Glondu pushed new tag debian/0.1a-10 at Debian OCaml Maintainers / ocaml-reins -- View it on GitLab: https://salsa.debian.org/ocaml-team/ocaml-reins/-/tree/debian/0.1a-10 You're receiving this email because of your account on salsa.debian.org.

[Git][ocaml-team/ocaml-reins] Pushed new tag archive/debian/0.1a-10

Stéphane Glondu pushed new tag archive/debian/0.1a-10 at Debian OCaml Maintainers / ocaml-reins -- View it on GitLab: https://salsa.debian.org/ocaml-team/ocaml-reins/-/tree/archive/debian/0.1a-10 You're receiving this email because of your account on salsa.debian.org.

Processed: Bug#971176 marked as pending in ocaml-reins

Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #971176 [src:ocaml-reins] ocaml-reins: FTBFS: File config.omake: line 9, characters 10-29 unbound variable: this.OCAMLDEP_MODULES Added tag(s) pending. -- 971176: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=971176 Debian Bug Tracking Syste

Processed: Bug#873237 marked as pending in ocaml-reins

Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #873237 [src:ocaml-reins] Updating the ocaml-reins Uploaders list Added tag(s) pending. -- 873237: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=873237 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Re: xen_4.17.0+24-g2f8851c37f-1_multi.changes REJECTED [and 1 more messages]

Dear Ian, Le 06/02/2023 à 11:41, Ian Jackson a écrit : ftpmaster REJECTed it: there is an ocaml stack rebuild[1] at them moment, where xen is a part of. So please upload to experimental. I am as surprised as you by this rejection reason... [1] https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/oca

Re: xen_4.17.0+24-g2f8851c37f-1_multi.changes REJECTED [and 1 more messages]

Dear Debian Ocaml Team: Hi. I'm with the Debian Xen Team. We recently uploaded xen_4.17.0+24-g2f8851c37f-1 to unstable. It went through NEW because of a cleanup of -dbg packages containing (C) debug symbols. ftpmaster REJECTed it: > there is an ocaml stack rebuild[1] at them moment, where xen

ocaml-uucp_15.0.0-3_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Thank you for your contribution to Debian. Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2023 10:47:11 +0100 Source: ocaml-uucp Architecture: source Version: 15.0.0-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian OCaml Maintainers Changed-

Processing of ocaml-uucp_15.0.0-3_source.changes

ocaml-uucp_15.0.0-3_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: ocaml-uucp_15.0.0-3.dsc ocaml-uucp_15.0.0-3.debian.tar.xz Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)