Package: yojson-tools
Version: 2.2.1-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts fileconflict
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'testing'.
It installed fine in 'testing', then the upgrade to 'sid' fails
because it tries to ove
Package: liquidsoap-doc
Version: 2.2.2-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'stable'.
It installed fine in 'stable', then the upgrade to 'sid' fails
because it tries to overwrite other
Package: hevea
Version: 2.36-1
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package ships (or creates)
a broken symlink.
>From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...):
0m42.8s ERROR: FAIL: Broken symlinks:
/usr/share/doc/hevea/examples/
Package: hevea-doc
Version: 2.36-1
Severity: normal
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package ships (or creates)
a broken symlink.
1m32.1s ERROR: FAIL: Broken symlinks:
/usr/share/doc/hevea/examples/upstream/hevea.sty -> ../hevea
Package: libcoq-paramcoq-ocaml
Version: 1.1.3-5
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'testing'.
It installed fine in 'testing', then the upgrade to 'sid' fails
because it tries to overwri
Package: libjs-of-ocaml-ocamlbuild-ocaml-dev
Version: 0.0.0+git20220118+852302c8-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'testing'.
It installed fine in 'testing', then the upgrade to 'sid
With all these B-D added, the build fails for me now with
Running[3870]: (cd _build/default/doc && /usr/bin/env sphinx-build -q -W -b
html sphinx refman-html)
Command [3870] exited with code 2:
$ (cd _build/default/doc && /usr/bin/env sphinx-build -q -W -b html sphinx
refman-html)
Warning, tre
Control: found -1 8.15.0-2
This looks like more missing Build-Depends(-Indep):
[...]
Running[3870]: (cd _build/default/doc && /usr/bin/env sphinx-build -q -W -b
html sphinx refman-html)
Running[3871]: (cd _build/default/doc && /usr/bin/env sphinx-build -q -W -b
latex sphinx refman-pdf)
Command
Source: coq-doc
Version: 8.15.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: fails to build from source
Hi,
I cannot rebuild coq-doc in sid (minimal pbuilder chroot), it fails with
[...]
dh binary --with sphinxdoc
dh_update_autotools_config
dh_autoreconf
debian/rules override_dh_auto_
Source: ssreflect
Version: 1.14.0-5
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'testing'.
It installed fine in 'testing', then the upgrade to 'sid' fails
because it tries to overwrite other pac
Package: coq-doc
Version: 8.6-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
coq-doc is several releases behind coq - how useful is this outdated
documentation package?
coq-doc | 8.4pl4-2 | stretch/non-free | source
coq-doc | 8.6-1 | sid/non-free | source
coq | 8.6-4
Package: libocamlgraph-ocaml-doc
Version: 2.0.0-2
Severity: normal
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package ships (or creates)
a broken symlink.
>From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...):
7m2.1s ERROR: FAIL: Broken symlink
Package: libtyxml-ocaml-doc
Version: 4.4.0-1
Severity: normal
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package ships (or creates)
a broken symlink.
>From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...):
0m49.0s ERROR: FAIL: Broken symlinks:
Package: libcalendar-ocaml-doc
Version: 2.04-3
Severity: normal
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package ships (or creates)
a broken symlink.
>From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...):
0m39.5s ERROR: FAIL: Broken symlinks:
Package: utop
Version: 2.7.0-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install if
xemacs21 is already installed.
>From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...):
Setting up utop (2.7.0-1) ...
Ins
Package: libocamlnet-ocaml-doc
Version: 4.1.8-2
Severity: normal
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Control: affects -1 + libocamlnet-ocaml-bin libocamlnet-ocaml-dev
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package ships (or creates)
a broken symlink.
>From the attached lo
Package: libbatteries-ocaml-doc
Version: 3.1.0-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
an upgrade test with piuparts revealed that your package installs files
over existing symlinks and possibly overwrites files owned by other
packages. This usually means an ol
Package: libgraphics-ocaml
Version: 5.1.0-2
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Control: affects -1 + ocaml-libs
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'buster'.
It installed fine in 'buster', then the upgrade to 'bullseye' f
Source: libaio-ocaml
Version: 1.0.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
Hi,
libaio-ocaml/experimental FTBFS since the upgrade to ocaml 4.11:
ocamlc -a -cclib -laio_stubs -cclib -laio -dllib dllaio_stubs.so -custom
Package: libdbus-ocaml
Version: 0.29-4
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'stable'.
It installed fine in 'stable', then the upgrade to 'sid' fails
because it tries to overwrite other pa
Package: coq,coqide
Version: 8.9.1-4
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install
because it tries to overwrite other packages files without declaring a
Breaks+Replaces relation.
See policy 7.6 at
h
Package: libnum-ocaml-dev
Version: 1.2-2
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Control: affects -1 + libreins-ocaml-dev
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'buster'.
It installed fine in 'buster', then the upgrade to 'bullse
Package: ocaml-nox
Version: 4.08.1-4
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Control: affects -1 + libguestfs-ocaml-dev
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'stable'.
It installed fine in 'stable', then the upgrade to 'sid' fai
Package: liblablgtk3-ocaml-dev
Version: 3.0~beta6-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'testing'.
It installed fine in 'testing', then the upgrade to 'sid' fails
because it tries to ove
Control: retitle -1 ocaml-base-nox: missing Breaks+Replaces: ocaml-base (<<
4.08.0-4)
On 04/08/2019 05.48, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
>> Preparing to unpack .../ocaml-nox_4.08.0-3_amd64.deb ...
>> Unpacking ocaml-nox (4.08.0-3) over (4.05.0-11) ...
>> dpkg: error processing archive
>> /var/cac
Package: ocaml-nox,ocaml-base-nox
Version: 4.08.0-3
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Control: affects -1 + ocaml-compiler-libs
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'sid' to 'experimental'.
It installed fine in 'sid', the
Package: libcamomile-ocaml-dev
Version: 1.0.1-1
Severity: normal
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package ships (or creates)
a broken symlink.
>From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...):
0m42.3s ERROR: FAIL: Broken symlinks
Package: dune
Version: 1.6.2-1
Severity: serious
User: trei...@debian.org
Usertags: edos-file-overwrite
Hi,
automatic installation tests of packages that share a file and at the
same time do not conflict by their package dependency relationships has
detected the following problem:
Selecting pr
Package: opam
Version: 2.0.0-4
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
a test with piuparts revealed that your package misses the copyright
file after an upgrade, which is a violation of Policy 12.5:
https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-docs.html#copyright
Package: menhir-doc
Version: 20180530-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'stable'.
It installed fine in 'stable', then the upgrade to 'sid' fails
because it tries to overwrite other p
Source: ocaml-visitors
Version: 20170725-1
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=ocaml-visitors&suite=unstable
from the amd64 log:
/usr/bin/make -C src all
make[2]: Entering directory '/<>/s
Followup-For: Bug #877267
There are similar broken links in other packages:
/usr/share/doc/ocaml/README.gz -> ../ocaml-base-nox/README.gz
/usr/share/doc/ocaml-base/README.gz -> ../ocaml-base-nox/README.gz
Andreas
Package: ocaml-nox
Version: 4.05.0-9
Severity: normal
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package ships (or creates)
a broken symlink.
>From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...):
0m50.2s ERROR: FAIL: Broken symlinks:
/usr/sh
Source: cudf
Version: 0.8-1
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
Hi,
this B-D was recentl added in sid, but the package in experimental FTBFS
now, too.
Andreas
Source: menhir
Version: 20170712-1
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
The last menhir binNMU failed on armel:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=menhir&arch=armel&ver=20170712-1%2Bb1&stamp=1505814442&raw=0
[...]
cp -p fanc
Package: coq-doc
Version: 8.4pl4-2
Severity: important
Hi,
this package looks outdated compared to coq 8.6-4 in stretch/sid.
Andreas
Package: galax-doc
Version: 1.1-15
Severity: normal
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package ships (or creates)
a broken symlink.
>From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...):
0m27.1s ERROR: FAIL: Broken symlinks:
/usr/shar
Package: libwhy-coq
Version: 2.36-5
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package is no longer
installable in sid:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
libwhy-coq : Depends: coq-8.5+4.02.3 but it is not in
Package: coq
Version: 8.6-4
Severity: important
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package produced an error
message during installation, but did not fail.
>From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...):
Setting up coq (8.6-4)
Package: frama-c
Version: 20161101+silicon+dfsg-4
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Control: found -1 20161101+silicon+dfsg-2
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'jessie'.
It installed fine in 'jessie', then the upgrade
On Sun, 26 Jan 2014 16:12:12 +0100 Nicolas Patrois
wrote:
> Package: coq
> Version: 8.4pl3dfsg-1
> Severity: minor
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> The last coq update showed these messages in aptitude:
>
> Preparing to unpack .../coq_8.4pl3dfsg-1_i386.deb ...
> ERROR: coq is broken - called emacs-pack
Package: libvariantslib-ocaml,libvariantslib-ocaml-dev
Version: 113.33.03-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'sid' to 'experimental'.
It installed fine in 'sid', then the upgrade to '
Package: libsexplib-ocaml,libsexplib-ocaml-dev
Version: 113.33.03-2
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'sid' to 'experimental'.
It installed fine in 'sid', then the upgrade to 'experime
Package: libfieldslib-ocaml,libfieldslib-ocaml-dev
Version: 113.33.03-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'sid' to 'experimental'.
It installed fine in 'sid', then the upgrade to 'expe
Package: libbin-prot-ocaml,libbin-prot-ocaml-dev
Version: 113.33.03-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'sid' to 'experimental'.
It installed fine in 'sid', then the upgrade to 'experi
Package: dose-distcheck
Version: 5.0-1
Severity: important
Hi,
dose-distcheck 5.0 does not work any more :-(
testdose.sh
==
#!/bin/sh
echo "
Package: bash_dash
Version: 1
Architecture: all
Depends: bash, dash
" | \
dose-debcheck --successes --latest ${latestarg}
--bg=lists/sid/Packages
Package: dose-doc
Version: 4.3-2
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts replaces-without-breaks
Hi,
during a test with piuparts and DOSE tools I noticed your package causes
removal of files that also belong to another package.
This is caused by using Replaces withou
Control: retitle -1 RM: janest-core [mips mipsel s390x all] -- RoQA; new B-D
missing on some architectures
Control: severity -1 normal
Control: reassign -1 ftp.debian.org
On Mon, 04 Apr 2016 19:51:19 +0200 Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> If libcore-kernel-ocaml-dev cannot be fixed to build (nea
Version: 4.02.1-1
Followup-For: Bug #801447
Hi,
version 4.02.1-1 stopped shipping the ocamlbuild.1.gz manpage (commit
f8d80491ee3048aee2a6864c09d2b9bbd2f2fee9), so the symlinks should go
away, too.
Andreas
Followup-For: Bug #815493
Control: reassign -1 ftp.debian.org
Control: severity -1 normal
Control: retitle -1 RM: opam [hurd-i386] -- RoQA; FTBFS: testsuite failures
Hi,
please decruft the outdated opam binary package on hurd-i386.
It FTBFS there with testsuite failures and nobody seems to invest
Package: libcore-ocaml
Version: 113.00.00-4
Severity: serious
Hi,
there are old builds of libcore-ocaml on mips, mipsel, s390x, but the
new package cannot be built there since the new B-D: libcore-kernel-ocaml-dev
FTBFS on these architectures. This prevents migration to testing.
If libcore-kerne
Source: opam
Version: 1.2.2-4
Severity: important
Hi,
opam FTBFS on hurd-i386 (but an older version successfully built on that
platform):
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=opam&arch=hurd-i386&ver=1.2.2-4&stamp=1450786650
[...]
make[4]: Entering directory '/«PKGBUILDDIR»/tests'
cd p
Source: ben
Version: 0.7.3
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
Hi,
ben FTBFS on mips, mipsel (but not mips64el):
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=ben&arch=mips&ver=0.7.3%2Bb1&stamp=1453241661
https://buildd.debian.org/sta
Source: ocamlnet
Version: 4.0.4-1
Severity: important
Hi,
ocamlnet FTBFS on kfreebsd-i386:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=ocamlnet&arch=kfreebsd-i386&ver=4.0.4-1&stamp=1444990060
debian/rules override_dh_install
make[1]: Entering directory '/«PKGBUILDDIR»'
dh_install --fail-m
Package: coq-doc
Version: 8.4pl4-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid stretch
Justification: fails to build from source
Hi,
coq-doc FTBFS in sid and stretch. (It builds fine in jessie.)
[...]
OCAMLCkernel/univ.mli
OCAMLCkernel/univ.ml
File "kernel/univ.ml", line 229, characters 0-2:
Error: This
Package: otags
Version: 4.01.1-2
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install. As
per definition of the release team this makes the package too buggy for
a release, thus the severity.
>From the atta
Package: liblabltk-ocaml
Version: 1:1.05-2
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Control: affects -1 + liblablgl-ocaml-dev
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'testing'.
It installed fine in 'testing', then the upgrade to 's
Thanks for your analysis, I'll update my environment now :-)
Andreas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ocaml-maint-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/55af6a36.2050...@debian.org
On 2015-07-21 17:36, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
> Le 21/07/2015 17:21, Stéphane Glondu a écrit :
>>> ocaml-fdkaac fails to build in pbuilder. [...]
>>
>> Running:
>>
>> apt-get source -d ocaml-fdkaac
>> cowbuilder --build ocaml-fdkaac_0.2.0-1.dsc
>>
>> suceeds.
>
> Sorry, I read "cowbuilder" inste
Package: ocaml-fdkaac
Version: 0.2.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source
ocaml-fdkaac fails to build in pbuilder. I don't know if it fails in
sbuild as well, since I don't have a sbuild setup.
Since the package is in non-free and has Build-Depends from non-free
as well it
Followup-For: Bug #722559
Hi,
only one B+R was added, the second is still missing:
Selecting previously unselected package libestring-ocaml.
Unpacking libestring-ocaml (from .../libestring-ocaml_20130822-2_amd64.deb)
...
dpkg: error processing
/var/cache/apt/archives/libestring-ocaml_201
On 2013-11-10 15:13, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
> Le 10/11/2013 14:55, Andreas Beckmann a écrit :
>> looking at the transition tracker pages, I sometimes would like to know
>> about the state of a transition in testing, not unstable.
>> E.g. when I filed 729214 I had no clue w
Package: ben
Version: 0.6.6
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
looking at the transition tracker pages, I sometimes would like to know
about the state of a transition in testing, not unstable.
E.g. when I filed 729214 I had no clue whether the openmpi1.6 packages
had started migrating to testing ...
Not sur
Package: libestring-ocaml-dev,libestring-ocaml
Version: 20130822-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Control: affects -1 + libsqlexpr-ocaml-dev
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'testing'.
It installed fine in 'testing
Package: libalt-ergo-ocaml-dev
Version: 0.95.1-2
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'wheezy'.
It installed fine in 'wheezy', then the upgrade to 'jessie' fails
because it tries to overw
Package: libgd-gd2-noxpm-ocaml
Version: 1.0~alpha5-6
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'testing'.
It installed fine in 'testing', then the upgrade to 'sid' fails
because it tries to ov
Package: flexdll,ocaml-mingw-w64-i686
Version: 4.00.1~20130426-2
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Control: affects -1 + mingw-ocaml
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'jessie'.
It installed fine in 'jessie', then the u
Package: coccinelle-doc
Version: 1.0.0~rc12.deb-4
Severity: serious
User: trei...@debian.org
Usertags: edos-file-overwrite
Date:
Architecture: amd64
Distribution: squeeze->wheezy (partial) upgrade
Hi,
automatic installation tests of packages that share a file and at the
same time do not conflict
Package: ocaml-compiler-libs
Version: 4.00.0-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'sid' to 'experimental'.
It installed fine in 'sid', then the upgrade to 'experimental' fails
because i
Package: liquidsoap
Version: 1.0.0-4
Severity: important
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left unowned
directories on the system after purge, which is a violation of
policy 6.8:
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-m
Package: dose-distcheck
Version: 2.9.14-3
Severity: normal
Try to feed this "package" on stdin to the following dose-debcheck
command:
Package: testtesttest
Version: 1
Architecture: all
Depends: gnu-fdisk (= 1.2.4-3+b1), util-linux (= 2.20.1-4)
dose-debcheck --successes --quiet \
--bg lists/sq
Package: apt-cudf
Version: 2.9.14-2
Severity: important
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left unowned
directories on the system after purge, which is a violation of
policy 6.8:
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-ma
Package: mingw32-ocaml
Version: 3.12.1+debian2
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'squeeze'.
It installed fine in 'squeeze', then the upgrade to 'wheezy' fails.
>From the attached log
Package: apt-cudf
Version: 2.9.13-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install. As
per definition of the release team this makes the package too buggy for
a release, thus the severity.
>From the a
Package: unison2.32.52-gtk
Version: 2.32.52-4
Severity: important
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left unowned files on
the system after purge, which is a violation of policy 6.8 (or 10.8):
http://www.debian.org/doc/debia
75 matches
Mail list logo
