Updating extlib to 1.7.8

Hi Stéphane, I've pushed to the extlib salsa repo with an update to the latest upstream version 1.7.8. The upstream changelog mentioned 2 breaking changes: * breaking change: ExtList.find_map type updated to match stdlib (following deprecation in previous release) * breaking change: minimal (reco

[Git][ocaml-team/extlib] Pushed new tag upstream/1.7.8

Andy Li pushed new tag upstream/1.7.8 at Debian OCaml Maintainers / extlib -- View it on GitLab: https://salsa.debian.org/ocaml-team/extlib/-/tree/upstream/1.7.8 You're receiving this email because of your account on salsa.debian.org.

[Git][ocaml-team/extlib][pristine-tar] pristine-tar data for extlib_1.7.8.orig.tar.gz

Andy Li pushed to branch pristine-tar at Debian OCaml Maintainers / extlib Commits: 034b055e by Andy Li at 2021-02-13T22:22:34+08:00 pristine-tar data for extlib_1.7.8.orig.tar.gz - - - - - 2 changed files: - + extlib_1.7.8.orig.tar.gz.delta - + extlib_1.7.8.orig.tar.gz.id Changes

[Git][ocaml-team/headache] Pushed new tag debian/1.04-1

Andy Li pushed new tag debian/1.04-1 at Debian OCaml Maintainers / headache -- View it on GitLab: https://salsa.debian.org/ocaml-team/headache/-/tree/debian/1.04-1 You're receiving this email because of your account on salsa.debian.org.

Re: Updating extlib to 1.7.7 and build with minimal=1

On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 3:24 PM Ralf Treinen wrote: > > Hello, > > On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 09:46:44AM +0800, Andy Li wrote: > > On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 6:29 AM Andy Li wrote: > > > I've briefly looked at headache. It seems the Debian package has > > >

Re: Updating extlib to 1.7.7 and build with minimal=1

On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 6:29 AM Andy Li wrote: > I've briefly looked at headache. It seems the Debian package has > diverged from the OPAM one too. > The OPAM headache uses camomile instead of extlib to handle utf8. According to its old homepage, headache was indeed moved to Git

Re: Updating extlib to 1.7.7 and build with minimal=1

On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 11:24 PM Stéphane Glondu wrote: > I'm afraid we'll have to build again without minimal=1. Cannot the > incompatibility fixed in Haxe? Otherwise, I think we'll have to create > new binary packages libextlib-minimal-ocaml{,-dev}... Haxe can use a patch, but the readme of ext

Updating extlib to 1.7.7 and build with minimal=1

Hi, I've just pushed some commits to extlib's salsa repo. I changed d/rules to build it with minimal=1, which is also used by the OPAM extlib package. The flag excludes Unzip, UChar, and UTF8, which conflict with other OCaml code including the Haxe 4.1.0 code base, which I was about to package.

[Git][ocaml-team/ocaml-sedlex] Pushed new tag debian/2.1-3

Andy Li pushed new tag debian/2.1-3 at Debian OCaml Maintainers / ocaml-sedlex -- View it on GitLab: https://salsa.debian.org/ocaml-team/ocaml-sedlex/tree/debian/2.1-3 You're receiving this email because of your account on salsa.debian.org.

[Git][ocaml-team/ocaml-gen] Pushed new tag debian/0.5.2-2

Andy Li pushed new tag debian/0.5.2-2 at Debian OCaml Maintainers / ocaml-gen -- View it on GitLab: https://salsa.debian.org/ocaml-team/ocaml-gen/tree/debian/0.5.2-2 You're receiving this email because of your account on salsa.debian.org.

[Git][ocaml-team/ocaml-rope] Pushed new tag debian/0.6.2-2

Andy Li pushed new tag debian/0.6.2-2 at Debian OCaml Maintainers / ocaml-rope -- View it on GitLab: https://salsa.debian.org/ocaml-team/ocaml-rope/tree/debian/0.6.2-2 You're receiving this email because of your account on salsa.debian.org.

[Git][ocaml-team/ocaml-sedlex] Pushed new tag debian/2.1-2

Andy Li pushed new tag debian/2.1-2 at Debian OCaml Maintainers / ocaml-sedlex -- View it on GitLab: https://salsa.debian.org/ocaml-team/ocaml-sedlex/tree/debian/2.1-2 You're receiving this email because of your account on salsa.debian.org.

[Git][ocaml-team/ocaml-sedlex] Pushed new tag debian/2.1-1

Andy Li pushed new tag debian/2.1-1 at Debian OCaml Maintainers / ocaml-sedlex -- View it on GitLab: https://salsa.debian.org/ocaml-team/ocaml-sedlex/tree/debian/2.1-1 You're receiving this email because of your account on salsa.debian.org.

Bug#944404: libsedlex-ocaml: sedlex should depend on ocaml-uchar

Hi Kyle, On Sat, Nov 9, 2019 at 5:15 PM Kyle Robbertze wrote: > It seems that sedlex should depend on ocaml-uchar[1], which needs to be > packaged for Debian. According to sedlex opam file, this is already done > for opam builds of sedlex [2]. > > [1] https://github.com/ocaml/uchar > [2] https://

[Git][ocaml-team/ocaml-gen] Pushed new tag debian/0.5.2-1

Andy Li pushed new tag debian/0.5.2-1 at Debian OCaml Maintainers / ocaml-gen -- View it on GitLab: https://salsa.debian.org/ocaml-team/ocaml-gen/tree/debian/0.5.2-1 You're receiving this email because of your account on salsa.debian.org.

[Git][ocaml-team/ocaml-gen][pristine-tar] pristine-tar data for ocaml-gen_0.5.2.orig.tar.gz

Andy Li pushed to branch pristine-tar at Debian OCaml Maintainers / ocaml-gen Commits: d6a16604 by Andy Li at 2019-11-05T05:50:30Z pristine-tar data for ocaml-gen_0.5.2.orig.tar.gz - - - - - 2 changed files: - + ocaml-gen_0.5.2.orig.tar.gz.delta - + ocaml-gen_0.5.2.orig.tar.gz.id Changes

[Git][ocaml-team/ocaml-gen] Pushed new tag upstream/0.5.2

Andy Li pushed new tag upstream/0.5.2 at Debian OCaml Maintainers / ocaml-gen -- View it on GitLab: https://salsa.debian.org/ocaml-team/ocaml-gen/tree/upstream/0.5.2 You're receiving this email because of your account on salsa.debian.org.

[Git][ocaml-team/ocaml-sedlex][pristine-tar] pristine-tar data for ocaml-sedlex_2.1.orig.tar.gz

Andy Li pushed to branch pristine-tar at Debian OCaml Maintainers / ocaml-sedlex Commits: 83eb4993 by Andy Li at 2019-10-26T23:37:37Z pristine-tar data for ocaml-sedlex_2.1.orig.tar.gz - - - - - 2 changed files: - + ocaml-sedlex_2.1.orig.tar.gz.delta - + ocaml-sedlex_2.1.orig.tar.gz.id

[Git][ocaml-team/ocaml-sedlex] Pushed new tag upstream/2.1

Andy Li pushed new tag upstream/2.1 at Debian OCaml Maintainers / ocaml-sedlex -- View it on GitLab: https://salsa.debian.org/ocaml-team/ocaml-sedlex/tree/upstream/2.1 You're receiving this email because of your account on salsa.debian.org.

[Git][ocaml-team/ocaml-sedlex][master] 3 commits: New upstream version 2.1

Andy Li pushed to branch master at Debian OCaml Maintainers / ocaml-sedlex Commits: 4e8df2fe by Andy Li at 2019-10-26T23:37:35Z New upstream version 2.1 - - - - - 5b1c8c9e by Andy Li at 2019-10-26T23:37:37Z Update upstream source from tag 'upstream/2.1' Update to upstream version

Re: Problem with generating sedlex doc with ocamldoc

Hi Stéphane, Thanks for the tip. Do you have any good way to let dh_ocamldoc exclude "sedlex_ppx.ml"? I tried -X, but looks like it's only used when generating the -I flags. I also asked this in the OCaml forum, and someone suggested to use a new ocamldoc flag "-lib": https://discuss.ocaml.org/t/

Problem with generating sedlex doc with ocamldoc

Hi, I'm updating the sedlex package and got stuck with an error with dh_ocamldoc. I'm not familiar with ocamldoc + the ppx system (which is adopted by sedlex in the recent version), so I would like to have some help. I tried to call ocamldoc manually with an existing sedlex 2.1 installation (inst

Bug#878983: cduce FTBFS with OCaml 4.05.0

Hi, On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 8:18 PM Stéphane Glondu wrote: > > The upstream cduce-next branch can be built with Debian's OCaml 4.05. > > I've asked upstream (Giuseppe Castagna) to make a new release and I > > was told that they will do it soon. > > Any news on that? > I haven't heard anything y

Re: Comments regarding ocaml-qcheck_0.9-1_amd64.changes

On Sun, 24 Mar 2019, 19:15 Ralf Treinen, wrote: > Hi, > > On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 05:19:53PM +, Joerg Jaspert wrote: > > Sorry for the processing delay, but do you still want this in > > unstable, given the hard freeze? > > since there is already ocaml-qcheck 0.8-1 in testing, 0.9-1 should >

Bug#878983:

For the record, I've briefly looked into this. The initially reported build error can be fixed by applying https://gitlab.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr/cduce/cduce/commit/020feca404095bcc08ebfa6deebaecbbc7399852. There are, however, some other build errors due to the reference to OCaml source files in

[Git][ocaml-team/ocaml-rope] Pushed new tag upstream/0.6.2

Andy Li pushed new tag upstream/0.6.2 at Debian OCaml Maintainers / ocaml-rope -- View it on GitLab: https://salsa.debian.org/ocaml-team/ocaml-rope/tree/upstream/0.6.2 You're receiving this email because of your account on salsa.debian.org.

[Git][ocaml-team/ocaml-rope] Pushed new tag debian/0.6.2-1

Andy Li pushed new tag debian/0.6.2-1 at Debian OCaml Maintainers / ocaml-rope -- View it on GitLab: https://salsa.debian.org/ocaml-team/ocaml-rope/tree/debian/0.6.2-1 You're receiving this email because of your account on salsa.debian.org.

[Git][ocaml-team/ocaml-rope][pristine-tar] pristine-tar data for ocaml-rope_0.6.2.orig.tar.bz2

Andy Li pushed to branch pristine-tar at Debian OCaml Maintainers / ocaml-rope Commits: 727435b3 by Andy Li at 2019-03-20T09:43:20Z pristine-tar data for ocaml-rope_0.6.2.orig.tar.bz2 - - - - - 2 changed files: - + ocaml-rope_0.6.2.orig.tar.bz2.delta - + ocaml-rope_0.6.2.orig.tar.bz2.id

[Git][ocaml-team/ocaml-migrate-parsetree] Pushed new tag debian/1.2.0-2

Andy Li pushed new tag debian/1.2.0-2 at Debian OCaml Maintainers / ocaml-migrate-parsetree -- View it on GitLab: https://salsa.debian.org/ocaml-team/ocaml-migrate-parsetree/tree/debian/1.2.0-2 You're receiving this email because of your account on salsa.debian.org.

Bug#918769: ocaml-migrate-parsetree FTBFS:dh_install fails

Hi Ralf, > In fact, when I build ocaml-migrate-parsetree using pbuilder it builds > fine. However If I build it with gbp buildpackage I get the error as > described in the bug report. I've just tried to reproduce it again, this time with gbp buildpackage, in a clean debian:unstable docker image,

Bug#918769: ocaml-migrate-parsetree FTBFS:dh_install fails

Hi Ralf, On Tue, Jan 8, 2019 at 11:18 PM Ralf Treinen wrote: > ocaml-migrate-parsetree fails to build on sid using debhelper version 12 > (12 is the version of the debhelper package, I haven't touched the DH > compat level) : > > dh_install: libmigrate-parsetree-ocamlbuild-ocaml missing files: >

[Git][ocaml-team/ocaml-rope] Pushed new tag debian/0.6.1-2

Andy Li pushed new tag debian/0.6.1-2 at Debian OCaml Maintainers / ocaml-rope -- View it on GitLab: https://salsa.debian.org/ocaml-team/ocaml-rope/tree/debian/0.6.1-2 You're receiving this email because of your account on salsa.debian.org.

[Git][ocaml-team/ocaml-sedlex] Pushed new tag debian/1.99.4-2

Andy Li pushed new tag debian/1.99.4-2 at Debian OCaml Maintainers / ocaml-sedlex -- View it on GitLab: https://salsa.debian.org/ocaml-team/ocaml-sedlex/tree/debian/1.99.4-2 You're receiving this email because of your account on salsa.debian.org.

[Git][ocaml-team/ocaml-migrate-parsetree] Pushed new tag debian/1.2.0-1

Andy Li pushed new tag debian/1.2.0-1 at Debian OCaml Maintainers / ocaml-migrate-parsetree -- View it on GitLab: https://salsa.debian.org/ocaml-team/ocaml-migrate-parsetree/tree/debian/1.2.0-1 You're receiving this email because of your account on salsa.debian.org.

Bug#917058: ocaml-migrate-parsetree FTBFS:

Hi Ralf, I've just pushed to salsa for a fix and update to the latest upstream version. I tested the update with autopkgtests against unstable-amd64 and unstable-mips, both passed. Would you review and upload? Best, Andy On Sat, Dec 22, 2018 at 9:00 AM Adrian Bunk wrote: > Source: ocaml-migrat

[Git][ocaml-team/ocaml-migrate-parsetree] Pushed new tag upstream/1.2.0

Andy Li pushed new tag upstream/1.2.0 at Debian OCaml Maintainers / ocaml-migrate-parsetree -- View it on GitLab: https://salsa.debian.org/ocaml-team/ocaml-migrate-parsetree/tree/upstream/1.2.0 You're receiving this email because of your account on salsa.debian.org.

[Git][ocaml-team/ocaml-migrate-parsetree][pristine-tar] pristine-tar data for ocaml-migrate-parsetree_1.2.0.orig.tar.gz

Andy Li pushed to branch pristine-tar at Debian OCaml Maintainers / ocaml-migrate-parsetree Commits: 9d0abdc4 by Andy Li at 2018-12-23T13:15:13Z pristine-tar data for ocaml-migrate-parsetree_1.2.0.orig.tar.gz - - - - - 2 changed files: - + ocaml-migrate-parsetree_1.2.0.orig.tar.gz.delta

[Git][ocaml-team/ocaml-migrate-parsetree][master] 3 commits: New upstream version 1.2.0

Andy Li pushed to branch master at Debian OCaml Maintainers / ocaml-migrate-parsetree Commits: b57e68fc by Andy Li at 2018-12-23T13:15:12Z New upstream version 1.2.0 - - - - - b46e3eca by Andy Li at 2018-12-23T13:15:13Z Update upstream source from tag 'upstream/1.2.0' Update t

RFS: ocaml-ptmap/2.0.4-1

ld for both amd64 and mips. Autopkgtests are also ran successfully for amd64 and mips. Regards, Andy Li

RFS: ocaml-qtest/2.9-1

ts are also ran successfully for amd64 and mips. Please review and let me know if there is any problem. Regards, Andy Li

RFS: ocaml-sedlex/1.99.4-1

ontrary to ocamllex, lexer specifications for sedlex are embedded in regular OCaml source files. This is a dependency of the next version of Haxe (v4.0.0). Regards, Andy Li

RFS: ocaml-qcheck/0.8-1

Hi, I'm looking for a sponsor for my package ocaml-qcheck. The ITP bug: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=903371 * Package name: ocaml-qcheck Version : 0.8 Upstream Author : Simon Cruanes Rudi Grinberg Jacques-Pascal Deplai

Re: RFS: ocaml-obuild/0.1.8-1

Hi Ralf, On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 2:05 PM, Ralf Treinen wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun, May 13, 2018 at 10:40:40PM +0800, Andy Li wrote: > > > I have just updated ocaml-migrate-parsetree to latest upstream release > in > > salsa. > > However, when I test bui

Bug#900018: FTBFS with latest cmdliner

Hi Mehdi, Just saw that you've fixed that in the new upload. Thanks for taking care of it! Best regards, Andy On Sun, Jun 3, 2018 at 7:08 PM, Mehdi Dogguy wrote: > Hi Andy, > > On 2018-05-25 08:40, Andy Li wrote: > >> I've a patch: >> https://github.com/ocaml

Bug#900018: FTBFS with latest cmdliner

On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 3:02 PM, Mehdi Dogguy wrote: > > I have the feeling that OPAM team is not willing to support OPAM 1.2.2 > for a long time. So it doesn't make sense, at least for me, to > include it in Buster. > > Yesterday, I've uploaded opam-file-format to NEW. As soon as it gets > accept

Bug#900018: FTBFS with latest cmdliner

I've a patch: https://github.com/ocaml/opam/compare/1.2.2...andyli:1.2.2-fix.patch It's based on the discussion with upstream at https://discuss.ocaml.org/t/the-forever-beta-issue/1779/6 Best regards, Andy

Re: RFS: ocaml-obuild/0.1.8-1

On Sat, May 12, 2018 at 5:44 PM, Ralf Treinen wrote: > > done. > > However, there are some things that could be improved in future > releases. In particular, there is no real documentation. It would > already help to install README.md into /usr/share/doc, more if there > were real manpages. > > Al

Re: alioth -> salsa migration

On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 4:11 AM, Ralf Treinen wrote: > On Tue, May 08, 2018 at 11:25:46AM +0800, Andy Li wrote: > > I found that I can no longer push to the package repos that I created and > > maintained. Possibly because I am only a DM, and using a guest account. > > Wo

Re: RFS: ocaml-obuild/0.1.8-1

I'm still looking for a sponsor for ocaml-obuild, which I've just updated it to the latest upstream release. The deb in mentors: https://mentors.debian.net/package/ocaml-obuild Package source in salsa: https://salsa.debian.org/ocaml-team/ocaml-obuild Best regards, Andy

Re: alioth -> salsa migration

I found that I can no longer push to the package repos that I created and maintained. Possibly because I am only a DM, and using a guest account. Would you add me to the ocaml-team? My alioth account is "andyli-guest". I've registered the salsa guest account with the same name. I'm maintaining oca

Accepted jbuilder 1.0~beta19-1 (source) into unstable

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2018 15:21:27 +0800 Source: jbuilder Binary: jbuilder Architecture: source Version: 1.0~beta19-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian OCaml Maintainers Changed-By: Andy Li Description: jbuilder

Accepted jbuilder 1.0~beta18-1 (source) into unstable

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2018 16:36:09 +0800 Source: jbuilder Binary: jbuilder Architecture: source Version: 1.0~beta18-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian OCaml Maintainers Changed-By: Andy Li Description: jbuilder

Re: jbuilder

Hi Ralf, On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 5:23 AM, Ralf Treinen wrote: > > I somehow missed your original mail about jbuilder 1.0~beta18. Is there > already someone from the team looking at your updated package? Otherwise > I can look at it over the weekend. > No, I haven't got any response other than y

Updating jbuilder to 1.0~beta18

Hi Stéphane, There was a new jbuilder release that fixes #881770 . I've updated the package in alioth for the new release. FYI, jbuilder is being renamed to dune, but the actually rename (e.g. the command name) has not happened yet

Updating extlib to 1.7.2

Team upload. * New upstream release. - Update ocamldoc generation. * standards-version 4.1.1 (no change) * Add dh_missing --fail-missing. * Add autopkgtest support. -- Andy Li Tue, 28 Nov 2017 14:30:15 +0800 Best regards, Andy

Re: RFS: ocaml-obuild/0.1.8-1

Upstream has just released 0.1.9, so I've just updated the package. Would anyone review and sponsor it? Best regards, Andy

Bug#881770: jbuilder: library builds fail on byte-code-only architectures

Just forwarded to upstream: https://github.com/janestreet/jbuilder/issues/330

Re: RFS: ocaml-rope/0.5-1

Thanks for the review! > The files bench/tinyRope.* have a different copyright holder and > slightly different license, they must be mentionend in debian/copyright > (otherwise ftp master will reject the package). Good catch. Updated d/copyright. Also reported to upstream: https://github.com/Chri

RFS: ocaml-rope/0.5-1

Hi, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ocaml-rope" * Package name: ocaml-rope Version : 0.5-1 Upstream Author : Christophe Troestler * URL : http://rope.forge.ocamlcore.org/ * License : LGPL-2.1+ with linking exception Section : oca

RFS: ocaml-obuild/0.1.8-1

Hi, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ocaml-obuild" * Package name: ocaml-obuild Version : 0.1.8-1 Upstream Author : Vincent Hanquez and Jerome Maloberti * URL : https://github.com/ocaml-obuild/obuild * License : BSD-2-clause Section

RFS: ocaml-gen 0.5-1

Hi, I've just updated ocaml-gen for the latest upstream release (0.5) in alioth. The upstream changelog can be found at https://github.com/c-cube/gen/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md#05 Would you review and upload it? Best regards, Andy

Re: RFS: ocaml-migrate-parsetree

Thanks for the check! I've updated the package to put the docs into libmigrate-parsetree-ocaml-doc. Let me know if there is anything missing. Best regards, Andy On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 8:19 PM, Ximin Luo wrote: > Ximin Luo: >> Andy Li: >>> Hi Ximin, >>> >>&

Re: RFS: ocaml-migrate-parsetree

Hi Ximin, I've updated the package according to your suggestions, and pushed the changes to alioth. Please review. Thank you and best regards, Andy

Re: RFS: ocaml-migrate-parsetree

Thanks for the review! On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 4:10 PM, Ximin Luo wrote: > It creates a script to do the actual preprocessing so we get a complete set > of docs. (Yes I know PP is deprecated, but ocamldoc still supports it..) > > More generally, it looks like jbuilder expects to use odoc instead

RFS: ocaml-migrate-parsetree

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ocaml-migrate-parsetree" * Package name: ocaml-migrate-parsetree Version : 1.0.6-1 Upstream Author : Frédéric Bour and Jérémie Dimino * URL : https://github.com/ocaml-ppx/ocaml-migrate-parsetree * License : LGP

How to package a lib that use jbuilder?

Hi, I am going to package ocaml-migrate-parsetree (ITP ), and it uses jbuilder for building. >From what I saw, `jbuilder install` calls `ocaml-install` from opam and will install the lib into the opam repo. I suppose we don't want to do th

Bug#876530: ocaml-gen FTBFS with OCaml 4.05.0: E: Cannot find external tool 'ocamlbuild'

I've just pushed a fix to Alioth. Stéphane: Would you help upload it? Best regards, Andy

Bug#873781: ocaml-gen: FTBFS without ocamlopt: /usr/lib/ocaml/gen/*.a missing

The *.a files should be marked as optional install items. I've just pushed a fix to alioth. My test build log of mips using sbuild can be found at https://gist.github.com/andyli/c53ebf60246bd8078c272d530bb7e1ce Stéphane: Would you review and upload, please? Best regards, Andy

Re: Update xml-light to 2.4

On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 12:08 AM, Stéphane Glondu wrote: > > On 06/07/2017 07:01, Andy Li wrote: > > The current Debian package of xml-light is at 2.2, which is quite outdated. > > Upstream also moved the main development repo to GitHub. > > I've updated the p

Re: Update xml-light to 2.4

Ping. Mehdi?

Update xml-light to 2.4

Hi, The current Debian package of xml-light is at 2.2, which is quite outdated. Upstream also moved the main development repo to GitHub. I've updated the packaged and pushed my work to https://github.com/andyli/xml-light-debian Should I push my commits to Alioth or would you integrate it somehow?

RFS: ocaml-sedlex/1.99.3-1

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ocaml-sedlex" * Package name: ocaml-sedlex Version : 1.99.3-1 Upstream Author : Alain Frisch * URL : https://github.com/alainfrisch/sedlex * License : MIT Section : ocaml It builds those binary pac

Re: RFS: gen/0.4.0.1-1

On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 5:04 PM, Stéphane Glondu wrote: > > It looks like something changed in debhelper recently, and the package > FTBFS. I fixed that by editing libgen-ocaml-dev.install.in (I pushed the > fix). > > Oh, I forgot to check: your package installs some .cmxs files. Please > consider

Re: RFS: gen/0.4.0.1-1

On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 4:12 PM, Stéphane Glondu wrote: > > If you always keep the genuine .orig.tar.gz file in the parent of your > working directory, I think there is no need to change your workflow. But if > the file is missing (e.g. after a fresh `git clone`), `gbp buildpackage` > will recreat

Re: RFS: gen/0.4.0.1-1

Thanks, Stéphane. On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 8:08 PM, Stéphane Glondu wrote: > > - I've created branches upstream and pristine-tar to better match our > gbp-based workflow - I've added debian/gbp.conf > I've never used pristine-tar. Is it only for backing up the original source tar file? I only us

Re: RFS: gen/0.4.0.1-1

Thanks, Stéphane. I've created the repo at https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-ocaml-maint/packages/ocaml-gen.git/. The control vcs fields were updated, and I reuploaded the package to mentors: https://mentors.debian.net/package/ocaml-gen Please review :) Best regards, Andy

Re: RFS: gen/0.4.0.1-1

I created an Alioth account and requested to join pkg-ocaml-maint last week. But I haven't got any approval message yet. Can anyone approve me there? My id is andyli-guest. Best regards, Andy

Re: RFS: gen/0.4.0.1-1

On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 6:42 PM, Ximin Luo wrote: > > One thing though is that the source package should probably be renamed > "ocaml-gen", I think "gen" is too generic and can potentially conflict with > other things. > Thanks for the comments! Renamed and reuploaded to https://mentors.debian.net

RFS: gen/0.4.0.1-1

ckage with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gen/gen_0.4.0.1-1.dsc This is a dependency of sedlex, which in turn is a new dependency of the next version of Haxe (v4.0.0). Regards, Andy Li

opam package dependency

Hi, This is Andy, the maintainer of the haxe Debian package , also a member of the Haxe Foundation, which is the upstream organization. We are considering to make use of more existing OPAM packages for building the Haxe compiler, but some of them do not have a