Package: ocaml
Version: 3.11.0-1a0.mrvn.1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Hi,
the unixsupport.h header provides functions to convert unix errno into
ocamls Unix.error, which is sufficient for most applications. The
attached patch adds a function for the reverse conversion.
See http://caml.inria.f
Package: ocaml-sha
Version: 1.4-5
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Hi,
I wanted to use ocaml-sha in a situation where I need to store and
load checksums but don't have a in/out_channel. So I've added a
to_binary function to sha1, sha256 and sha512. The resulting string
should be architecture indepe
Package: ocaml
Version: 3.10.2-3
Severity: normal
Hi,
I wrote some bindings for libaio using custom blocks for the C
structures I need to allocate for the internal state and buffer. I
also wrote *_finalize(value) functions for them so they get properly
cleaned up when no longer in use.
I assumed
Package: advi
Version: 1.5.2+cvs-2004.07.27
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
Hi,
attached the debuild log from advi. Don't know why it suddenly fails on
alpha when it worked everywhere else.
MfG
Goswin
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, Mar 09, 2003 at 11:28:14AM +0100, Goswin Brederlow wrote:
> > Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > Format: 1.7
> > > Date: Sat, 08 Mar 2003 11:10:20 +0100
> > > Source: lablgtk2
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, Mar 09, 2003 at 11:28:14AM +0100, Goswin Brederlow wrote:
> > Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > Format: 1.7
> > > Date: Sat, 08 Mar 2003 11:10:20 +0100
> > > Source: lablgtk2
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Format: 1.7
> Date: Sat, 08 Mar 2003 11:10:20 +0100
> Source: lablgtk2
> Binary: liblablgtk2-ocaml liblablgtk2-ocaml-dev
> Architecture: source i386
Why i386 only?
MfG
Goswin
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Format: 1.7
> Date: Sat, 08 Mar 2003 11:10:20 +0100
> Source: lablgtk2
> Binary: liblablgtk2-ocaml liblablgtk2-ocaml-dev
> Architecture: source i386
Why i386 only?
MfG
Goswin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "uns
Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi Goswin,
> have you any news regarding the debian package of mldonkey?
>
> I've just read on the debian ML that version 2 is out ...
>
> Do you need some kind of help?
>
> Cheers.
Gotta update my cvs then.
MfG
Goswin
PS: There is s
Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi Goswin,
> have you any news regarding the debian package of mldonkey?
>
> I've just read on the debian ML that version 2 is out ...
>
> Do you need some kind of help?
>
> Cheers.
Gotta update my cvs then.
MfG
Goswin
PS: There is s
Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 12:15:06PM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> > > For speed reasons I also want to provide a optimised version on archs
> > > that support it. The above tests find the right (best) ocamlopt. But
> > > how do I know that there is one
Sven LUTHER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 11:57:01AM +0200, Goswin Brederlow wrote:
> > Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Nice :)))
>
> Saddly, not all ocaml package are that clean.
autoconf. :)
> > > IMHO, this
Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 12:15:06PM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> > > For speed reasons I also want to provide a optimised version on archs
> > > that support it. The above tests find the right (best) ocamlopt. But
> > > how do I know that there is on
Sven LUTHER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 11:57:01AM +0200, Goswin Brederlow wrote:
> > Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Nice :)))
>
> Saddly, not all ocaml package are that clean.
autoconf. :)
> > > IMHO, this
Sven LUTHER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, Sep 08, 2002 at 03:13:19PM +0200, Goswin Brederlow wrote:
> > Sven LUTHER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > On Sun, Sep 08, 2002 at 02:34:45AM +0200, Goswin Brederlow wrote:
> >
Sven LUTHER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 09:59:02AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 08, 2002 at 06:45:37PM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> > > > Great. I will build a bytecode binary-all and a optimised with
> > > > arch=i386,alpha,
> > >
> > > Yes, you c
Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, Sep 08, 2002 at 06:45:37PM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> > > Great. I will build a bytecode binary-all and a optimised with
> > > arch=i386,alpha,
> >
> > Yes, you could also split the package in two binaries, the first one
> > being a by
Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Quoting Sven LUTHER ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> > > 2. mldonkey uses ocamlopt.opt but ocamlopt works as well. Which of the
> > > two should I use? Should I build-depend on eigther or conflict with
> > > one?
> >
> > You should build depend on ocaml-be
Sven LUTHER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, Sep 08, 2002 at 03:13:19PM +0200, Goswin Brederlow wrote:
> > Sven LUTHER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > On Sun, Sep 08, 2002 at 02:34:45AM +0200, Goswin Brederlow wrote:
> >
Sven LUTHER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 09:59:02AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 08, 2002 at 06:45:37PM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> > > > Great. I will build a bytecode binary-all and a optimised with
> > > > arch=i386,alpha,
> > >
> > > Yes, you
Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, Sep 08, 2002 at 06:45:37PM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> > > Great. I will build a bytecode binary-all and a optimised with
> > > arch=i386,alpha,
> >
> > Yes, you could also split the package in two binaries, the first one
> > being a b
Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Quoting Sven LUTHER ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> > > 2. mldonkey uses ocamlopt.opt but ocamlopt works as well. Which of the
> > > two should I use? Should I build-depend on eigther or conflict with
> > > one?
> >
> > You should build depend on ocaml-b
Sven LUTHER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, Sep 08, 2002 at 02:34:45AM +0200, Goswin Brederlow wrote:
> > Sven LUTHER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > Upstream choose to use rpath, and when i asked on d-m, a huge flameware
> > > about the
Sven LUTHER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, Sep 07, 2002 at 12:49:34PM +0200, Goswin Brederlow wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > after updating ocaml today I was again left without liblablgtk
> > libraries. They seem to get deleted out of /var/lib/ocaml/ld.conf
> &
Sven LUTHER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, Sep 08, 2002 at 02:34:45AM +0200, Goswin Brederlow wrote:
> > Sven LUTHER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > Upstream choose to use rpath, and when i asked on d-m, a huge flameware
> > > about the
Sven LUTHER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, Sep 07, 2002 at 12:49:34PM +0200, Goswin Brederlow wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > after updating ocaml today I was again left without liblablgtk
> > libraries. They seem to get deleted out of /var/lib/ocaml/ld.conf
&g
Sven LUTHER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, Sep 07, 2002 at 10:09:50AM +0200, Goswin Brederlow wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm packaging mldonkey and on debian-mentors it was suggested to join
> > this ML. So here I am.
> >
> > And of cause I h
Sven LUTHER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, Sep 07, 2002 at 10:09:50AM +0200, Goswin Brederlow wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm packaging mldonkey and on debian-mentors it was suggested to join
> > this ML. So here I am.
> >
> > And of cau
Hi,
after updating ocaml today I was again left without liblablgtk
libraries. They seem to get deleted out of /var/lib/ocaml/ld.conf
every time ocaml updates. Thats the second time now and this time I'm
sure it was the ocaml update causing it.
Am I the only one having that problem?
MfG
G
Hi,
after updating ocaml today I was again left without liblablgtk
libraries. They seem to get deleted out of /var/lib/ocaml/ld.conf
every time ocaml updates. Thats the second time now and this time I'm
sure it was the ocaml update causing it.
Am I the only one having that problem?
MfG
Hi,
I'm packaging mldonkey and on debian-mentors it was suggested to join
this ML. So here I am.
And of cause I have questions:
1. lintian complains about rpath being set. How do I tell ocamlopt to
not use rpath?
2. mldonkey uses ocamlopt.opt but ocamlopt works as well. Which of the
two should
Hi,
I'm packaging mldonkey and on debian-mentors it was suggested to join
this ML. So here I am.
And of cause I have questions:
1. lintian complains about rpath being set. How do I tell ocamlopt to
not use rpath?
2. mldonkey uses ocamlopt.opt but ocamlopt works as well. Which of the
two should
32 matches
Mail list logo
