Control: tag -1 confirmed
Control: severity -1 serious
On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 13:10:11 +, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Package: src:gmetadom
> Version: 0.2.6-6.1
> Severity: important
> Tags: sid stretch
> User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: libstdc++-cxx11
>
> Background [1]: libstdc+
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 17:45:55 +0200, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 10:05:09PM +0100, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> > Le 2014-03-27 20:08, Niels Thykier a écrit :
> > >
> > >I noticed that the fix for gtkmathview is sadly incomplete (see
> > >#638761). AFAICT lablgtkmathview does n
Package: ben
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
If a source package builds "Multi-Arch: same" binaries, it should get
binNMUs on all archs at the same time to remain co-installable. It
would be nice if ben's overview pages gave some indication for such
packages.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description:
Control: reopen -1
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 17:18:01 +, Romain Beauxis wrote:
>* Added debian/tmp/usr/lib/ocaml to libgd-ocaml.dirs
>Closes: #709853
Oh come the fuck on...
$ dpkg -c
/srv/ftp-master.debian.org/ftp/pool/main/g/gd4o/libgd-ocaml_1.0~alpha5-7_amd64.deb
|grep debian
drwx
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 20:21:28 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Am 08.05.2013 12:47, schrieb Stéphane Glondu:
> > During the freeze, a new major version of OCaml has been released. The
> > current version is 4.00.1 (already in experimental, the one in sid is
> > 3.12.1). It breaks some packages, a
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 13:46:50 +0200, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
> Le 23/05/2013 13:13, Arno Töll a écrit :
> > we are ready to upload Apache2 2.4 to Debian Sid now. This means the
> > transition is effectively starting now, and going to break your modules.
>
> There are currently ~20 source entang
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 10:27:48 +0200, Ralf Treinen wrote:
> Hello release team,
>
> tuareg-mode makes installation of emacs24 fail (#681823). This is tagged sid
> as emacs24 is not in wheezy, but OTOH this bug will bite users who will
> want to install emacs24 on top of wheezy. Would you unbloc
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 17:38:22 +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> On 0, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> >
> >during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade
> >from 'squeeze'. It installed fine in 'squeeze', then the upgrade to
> >'wheezy' fails.
> >
> >[snip]
> >
> >Ouch! apt shouldn'
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 21:33:06 +0100, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
> Le 05/03/2012 04:23, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu a écrit :
> > Please change Build-Depends of the package from libpng12-dev to libpng-dev.
>
> PTS says that camlimages is part of libtiff4-symbols transition. Can I
> upload it anyway?
>
You c
On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 18:20:09 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Package: libapron-dev
> Version:0.9.10-5
> Severity: serious
>
> libapron-dev depends on libppl0.10-dev, which doesn't exist anymore in
> unstable, now removed by ftp-master. Please depend on libppl0.11-dev
> instead.
>
Well. Or li
Hi Steve,
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 13:02:06 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> After applying this patch, I unfortunately still get a build failure in
> natty, but this appears to be unrelated to multiarch so may be
> Ubuntu-specific:
>
> ../boot/ocamlrun ../ocamlopt -warn-error A -nostdlib -g `./Com
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 22:06:47 +0100, Ralf Treinen wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 09:58:03PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
>
> > There are cases where some build-essential package is not installable if
> > you only look at the Packages file, but where this should be ignored
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 19:42:37 +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> the function dep_for_me() in the Python code checks, for each build-dep,
> if it is part of that list. If a build-dep is, it gets "simplified
> away". In your example it is trivially the case for 'libc6-dev', which
> gets removed.
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 08:54:19 +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> Practically, this can work two ways: we can have edos-builddebcheck
> query the dpkg database for installed packages (and their relationships,
> since they are not granted to be in sync with the APT database), or we
> can add an o
On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 19:04:11 +0200, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
> Another trick: the build is not (yet) clean enough for git-buildpackage,
> so it has to be called with --git-cleaner=3D"git reset --hard && git clea=
> n
> -dxf" (I know, how hugly...).
>
Ugh. What does "not clean enough" mean? Wh
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 15:51:16 +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> diff -urNad trunk~/matita/help/C/matita.xml trunk/matita/help/C/matita.xml
> --- trunk~/matita/help/C/matita.xml 2008-06-20 18:39:32.0 +0200
> +++ trunk/matita/help/C/matita.xml2009-06-08 15:32:42.0 +0200
> @@ -1,6
On Fri, 2009-01-30 at 19:08 +, Sylvain Le Gall wrote:
> I am not sure that every patches I have done are compliant with upstream
> LICENSE... However, I think that "few lines" patches are mostly
> irrelevent WRT license in general -- i.e. it is ok to provide a few line
> patches without copyrig
On Fri, 2009-01-30 at 17:07 +0100, Florent Monnier wrote:
> should I care in some way when leeching pathes or other pieces ?
> (pathes contain name for attribution but not license information)
In general, i think it's fair to consider that patches are under the
same license as the software, or at
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 01:12:05 +0100, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
> forwarded 504348 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=504348
> thanks
>
> [NOTE: bug cloned, reopened and reassigned to ocaml]
>
> Julien Cristau wrote:
> > Why do we care? The proper fix is e
On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 23:38:26 +0100, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
> Dave Benjamin wrote:
> >> Maybe your system is not up-to-date w.r.t other (non-OCaml-related)
> >> packages? Or there is some bad interaction with another Apache module?
> >
> > I upgraded all of my Apache 2 packages to the latest v
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 16:37:28 +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> The second part fixes also the "sqrt" problem, given that .cma files
> contain (once found) all the references needed to load additional
> libraries.
>
Why isn't libcamlrun_shared.so linked with -lm directly? Relying on the
.cma
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 13:35:10 +0200, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
> Julien Cristau a écrit :
> >> - I am not sure about call_ld_with_proper_flags.dpatch;
> >
> > Meaning? [...]
>
> I meant: I am not sure to have updated this patch properly.
>
OK. I thought you
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 01:32:03 +0200, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
> - I am not sure about call_ld_with_proper_flags.dpatch;
Meaning? The idea here is that you can't pass the same flags to ld and
gcc, and ocamlopt sometimes uses one and sometimes the other, using the
same variable, so we have to tr
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 12:05:55 +0200, David MENTRE wrote:
> Sure:
> = New version in Intrepid Ibex compared to Lenny, unmodified Intrepid package
> =
>
> facile intrepid 3.10.2 1.1-6.2
> facile lenny 3.10.2 1.1-6.1+b2
>
Loïc uploaded the new version to sid, and then synced it to intrepid.
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 17:39:09 +0200, Tobias Klauser wrote:
> I still see a problem with the liquidsoap logfile being written to /tmp
> [1]. The filename there is only depended on the PID of the liquidsoap
> process. Unfortunately I lack OCaml hacking skills so I didn't patch
> this one.
>
>
On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 10:46:18 -0700, Ross Boylan wrote:
> Should the bug be closed? The changelog doesn't mention anything about
> fixing it, as far as I can see.
> Ross
> On Tue, 2008-10-07 at 09:57 +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> > >* Provide examples/*.ml and examples/*.dat
On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 10:15:53 +0200, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
> ocsigen_1.1.0-1, Rebuild against ocaml-ssl/0.4.2-4, 1, alpha amd64 arm
> armel hppa i386 ia64 m68k mips mipsel powerpc s390 sparc
> ocsigen dep-wait ocaml-ssl (>= 0.4.2-4)
>
the dep-wait needs to be set on libssl-ocaml-dev (ocaml-ss
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 22:13:06 +0200, Loïc Minier wrote:
> If you're happy with the changes, I can NMU this debdiff at your
> earliest convenience; woudln't hurt for lenny, but could as well be
> experimental or sit in usntable.
>
Looks good to me. If nobody objects in the next days, I thin
Package: ocamlweb
Version: 1.37-8
Severity: normal
ocamlweb pulls in tetex-extra, which depends on texlive-lang-*. Please
update the dependencies to a reasonable level (maybe simply removing the
tetex-extra alternative would be enough, I haven't tried).
Thanks!
Julien
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 17:33:24 +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> Timo Juhani Lindfors a écrit :
> > Mehdi Dogguy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> Ok. It was corrected in why ≥ 2.14.
> >
> > Ok, it is probably too late to correct this for debian lenny? At the
> > moment it is not possible to launch a
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 14:52:59 -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Modified: trunk/packages/why/trunk/debian/changelog
> URL:
> http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/pkg-ocaml-maint/trunk/packages/why/trunk/debian/changelog?rev=5982&op=diff
> =
On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 09:45:11 +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Hi Julien,
>
> Julien Cristau [2008-09-07 0:48 +0200]:
> > I'm not sure this change is correct, for what it's worth. lintian is
> > buggy there, and the ocaml interpreter needs to be the same version as
On Sat, Sep 6, 2008 at 09:21:20 +, Martin Pitt wrote:
>* debian/control: Add dependency ocaml-base | ocaml, to provide a real
> package alternative to ocaml-base-$ABI, and satisfy lintian.
Hi Martin,
I'm not sure this change is correct, for what it's worth. lintian is
buggy there
reopen 496360
severity 496360 important
kthxbye
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 11:21:24 +0200, Romain Beauxis wrote:
> Hi !
>
> Indeed, liguidsoap uses files under /tmp to write logs and dump audio data
> during the live show.
>
> We don't consider this as a bug, but as feature (tm).
This is b
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 00:00:51 +0200, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
> Isn't this a NMU?
>
$ apt-cache showsrc camlpdf|grep @
Maintainer: Debian OCaml Maintainers
Uploaders: Romain Beauxis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
$ who-uploads camlpdf
Uploads for camlpdf:
0.3-3 to unstable: Romain Beauxis <[EMAIL PROTECTE
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 01:33:36 +0200, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
> Julien Cristau wrote:
> >> Another reason would be because it is somehow
> >> an unannounced (i.e. not in debian/patches) patch to upstream sources.
> >>
> > I don't understand that.
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 15:16:20 +0200, Romain Beauxis wrote:
> Le Wednesday 09 July 2008 14:46:25 Christoph Martin, vous avez écrit :
> > Hi,
>
> Hi !
>
> > For your information: I intent to make a backport of cryptokit for
> > etch-backports to support a backport of sks.
>
> Backporting
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 14:11:19 +0200, Rémi Vanicat wrote:
> One difficulties with this if evolving patch: git format-patch
> generate one patch by git commit, when some of the commit are new
> patches when other are modification of old patches. At least to use
> topic branch render this clearer
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 09:34:05 +0200, Rémi Vanicat wrote:
> 2008/7/9 Sylvain Le Gall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > I am probably a bit old school, but i really like having only debian/ in
> > .diff.gz.
> >
> > Having patches in quilt/dpatch/'whatever you want' but in debian/patches
> > is a good p
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 21:47:04 +0200, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
> Julien Cristau a écrit :
>>> The following commit has been merged in the master branch:
>>> commit c8bdd9e0fc12634749a2d0c7c5f678c49f7747dc
>>> Author: Stephane Glondu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>&
reassign 489085 libcamlimages-ocaml-dev 1:2.2.0-3
retitle 489085 missing dependencies
kthxbye
On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 09:59:02 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > ocamlopt.opt -warn-error A -inline 1 -I
> > /usr/lib/ocaml/3.10.2/camlimages events.o grwm.o grY11.o graphics.cmxa
> > unix.cmxa st
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 16:22:53 +0200, Christoph Martin wrote:
> When I try to compile sks with ocamlc instead of ocamlopt I get the
> following error:
>
> ocamlc -o ocextr ocextr.ml
> ./ocextr bdb_stubs.c > bdb.ml
> ocamlc-inline 40 -c bdb.ml
> /usr/bin/ocamlc: unknown option `-inline'.
>
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 15:59:23 +0200, Christoph Martin wrote:
> Dear Ocaml maintainers,
>
> I (co)maintain the Debian sks package which is build with ocaml. The
> build process extensively uses ocamlopt which is not availlable on all
> Debian architectures. As ocamlc is not a drop in replacemen
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 14:17:14 +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> Are you sure that the encountred bug is related to freetennis ?
> 1) In your mail, you say that "Freerunner FTBFS".
> 2) Freetennis has only one source file which is freetennis.ml. So, there
> is only *one* job to be executed by make.
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 11:11:32 +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> So, even assuming that the buildd have been invoked on the two packages
> for some weird buildd reason, I don't get why binary-arch was invoked.
Because that's what dpkg-buildpackage -B does, and what buildds use.
> But even adm
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 00:40:27 +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> If the package should not be built there it should be declared as such.
> If it can be built in some other way just make the package do that.
>
'This package should not be built on this architecture' is declared in
P-a-s, not in
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 22:28:04 +0300, George Danchev wrote:
> What we are supposed to do with FTBFS like #483280, #483307, and similar
> where
> ocamlopt binary is just not available on these particular architectures, in
> that case IA-64 ? Should we just set the severity to important as Luk
On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 19:43:40 -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Author: glondu-guest
> Date: Sat May 24 19:43:39 2008
> New Revision: 5688
>
> URL: http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/pkg-ocaml-maint/?sc=1&rev=5688
> Log:
> * Fix dependencies and location of dllpycaml_stubs.so (thanks to
>Michael
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 09:10:24 +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> IIRC this happened also during the last transition, and anyhow is not a
> bug in ocaml since everywhere else docbook2html worked properly. What I
> did not remember is how it was solved, was it just "luck" with the next
> arm buil
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 14:32:37 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> Anyway, I'll get the build-deps installed on agnesi and start a build.
>
It passed the failure point now.
aurel32 will try a build using a compiler with #476460 fixed. If that
doesn't help, I think the best we can d
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 14:25:17 +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 01:28:14PM +0200, Romain Beauxis wrote:
> > Isn't it possible to contraint gcc to 4.2 on arm in ocaml's build-deps ?
>
> No, because via deps only you can't change the default compiler which
> will respond
On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 14:00:03 +0200, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
> Things would be far more convenient if it were possible to specify
> dep-waits while uploading (as in binNMU requests). In this case,
> everyone could upload his package with dep-waits so that it is built
> only after all its depende
On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 18:04:38 +, Sylvain Le Gall wrote:
> I would better recommend beginning with "darcs" rather than "git". They
> share almost all principle, but "darcs" is more user friendly. Once you
> have get the basic principle of DSCM (get/pull/push/...), you should go
> to git.
>
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 10:28:01 -0400, Eric Cooper wrote:
> What is the Right Thing to do here? I shouldn't have to know how a
> library is implemented (whether or not it uses C stubs) in order to
> build a correct application, but it seems I do (or else always blindly
> turn on -custom). And e
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.25
#
# ocaml-mad (0.3.2-5) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
#
# * Fix FTBFS with new dpkg-dev by setting CFLAGS correctly in debian/rules
#(closes: 476038).
#
package libmad-ocaml libmad-ocaml-dev ocaml-mad
tags 476038 + pending
--
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.25
#
# ocaml-shout (0.2.5-2) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
#
# * Fix FTBFS with new dpkg-dev by setting CFLAGS correctly in debian/rules
#(closes: 476027).
#
package ocaml-shout libshout-ocaml libshout-ocaml-dev
tags 476027 + pending
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 12:32:36 +0100, Romain Beauxis wrote:
> > ./configure --host=i486-linux-gnu --build=i486-linux-gnu --prefix=/usr
> > --mandir=\${prefix}/share/man --infodir=\${prefix}/share/info configuring
> > ocaml-shout 0.2.5
> > checking for ocamlc... /usr/bin/ocamlc
> > ocaml version
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 00:20:32 +0100, Romain Beauxis wrote:
> Anyway, thanks for the explaination, now come the time to find a fix..
> Should we change deps for ocaml in backports.org ? To me, it seems that:
> >Depends: ocaml-base (= 3.10.1-1~bpo40+1), ocaml-base-3.10.1, ocaml-nox-3.10.1
> Could
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 23:48:45 +0100, Romain Beauxis wrote:
> Hi all !
>
> Seems like there is another issue with ocaml builds on backports.org.
> Apparently, the build-dep for findlib fail to resolve under the buildd...
>
> Does anyone understand the report ?
> http://experimental.debia
On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 11:07:20 +0100, Romain Beauxis wrote:
> Le Wednesday 02 April 2008 11:04:20 Julien Cristau, vous avez écrit :
> > On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 11:02:14 +0100, Romain Beauxis wrote:
> > > In particular, some binary uploads from i386 could be nice, I fail to
&
On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 11:02:14 +0100, Romain Beauxis wrote:
> In particular, some binary uploads from i386 could be nice, I fail to
> setup an i386 cowbuilder on my amd64 system..
>
bpo is autobuilt...
Cheers,
Julien
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscri
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 18:20:53 -0400, Eric Cooper wrote:
> This seems to do the trick:
>
> ifneq ($(OCAML_HAVE_OCAMLOPT),yes)
> export DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS += nostrip
> endif
>
> The question remains whether this should be done automatically by ocaml.mk.
>
If you're using cdbs, I b
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 12:52:22 +0100, Romain Beauxis wrote:
> By the way, running ocamlobjinfo on a cmxa file doesn't give anything:
> 12:47 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/sources/svn/savonet/trunk/ocaml-jack/src%
> ocamlobjinfo ./jack.cmxa
> File ./jack.cmxa
> Not an object file
>
> But it works on a .c
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 01:36:54 +0100, Romain Beauxis wrote:
> Le Sunday 30 March 2008 21:06:13 Stefano Zacchiroli, vous avez écrit :
> > 1) (automatically) file bugs against currently bugged packages
> >
> > 2) finally start implementing a (set of) lintian test(s) specifically
> > for OCaml so t
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 23:08:53 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm looking for a library that can compute sha1 sums for ocaml.
> I currently need the following interface:
>
apt-get install libsha-ocaml-dev?
Cheers,
Julien
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a su
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 22:53:17 +0800, LI Daobing wrote:
> Package: mldonkey-server
> Version: 2.9.4-1
> Severity: normal
>
> --- Please enter the report below this line. ---
> Hello,
>
> if mldonkey is started when boot up, the default locale is C, so all the
> non-ascii charater in the new d
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 02:52:15 +0100, Romain Beauxis wrote:
> Le Friday 28 March 2008 02:36:12 Julien Cristau, vous avez écrit :
> > > ocaml-nox: usr/lib/ocaml/3.10.1/bigarray.cmx
> >
> > This one is actually shipped in ocaml-nox. I didn't look further, so
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 02:26:51 +0100, Romain Beauxis wrote:
> A quick and dirty script looked for package which ships a .cmxa file without
> corresponding .cmx.
Seems buggy.
>
> Now, the question is: is it relevant for all of them ?
>
> Here's the list ($PACKAGE: $MISSING_CMX):
>
> ocaml-no
Hi,
the following packages, involved in the current ocaml transition, should
be given back (they failed on the first attempt because of missing
dep-waits):
cameleon: alpha arm armel hppa ia64 mips mipsel powerpc sparc
Dep-Wait libpcre-ocaml-dev (>> 5.12.2-3), libxml-light-ocaml-dev (>> 2.2-8)
ca
Package: spamoracle
Version: 1.4-10
Severity: serious
See
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=spamoracle;ver=1.4-10;arch=arm;stamp=1204571603
chroot-unstable/build/buildd/spamoracle_1.4-10_arm.deb:
drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2008-03-03 12:11 ./
drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2008-03-03 12
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 13:48:03 +0100, Romain Beauxis wrote:
> > [This may actually not be an issue for liquidsoap, as it seems to be
> > statically linked against its ocaml dependencies, so apparently doesn't
> > need to wait for or delay the ocaml transition.]
>
> That's the point indeed. Also
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 13:27:41 +0100, Romain Beauxis wrote:
> My question now: what can we do to have a working package into
> testing, upload to testing security updates ?
>
No. Coordinate uploads and transitions with your dependencies, and be
patient. That's exactly the point of zack's mail
On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 18:04:37 -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Author: munga-guest
> Date: Mon Mar 3 18:04:36 2008
> New Revision: 5283
>
> URL: http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/pkg-ocaml-maint/?sc=1&rev=5283
> Log:
> fix double compilation problem
can you be more specific?
> Modified:
> tru
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 13:01:42 +0100, Marco Righi wrote:
> Can you insert two different packages: a transitional and a strict
> compiled one?
>
I have no idea what you mean. What would the purpose of adding new
packages be?
Cheers,
Julien
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wit
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 12:26:25 +0100, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
> We could either ask again to binNMU ocamlnet, or just do a sourceful
> upload...
>
Better just wait, it'll be retried at some point anyway.
Cheers,
Julien
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscr
On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 21:29:31 +0100, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
> Julien Cristau a écrit :
> > arch-independant packages are not rebuilt by binary NMUs, so you should
> > ignore those packages in the script.
>
> Is this correct? It doesn't seem to me: a package contai
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.16
# let's unmerge these two unrelated bugs
unmerge 339061
retitle 347270 ocamlopt produces buggy arm programs
tags 339061 - fixed-upstream
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
On Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 17:46:12 +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> The automatic generation of the ocamldoc API reference for -dev packages
> looks into the installation directory of a given package. Then it
> generates the ocamldoc API reference and installs it in the *very same*
> package on w
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 15:26:28 +0100, Stephane Glondu wrote:
> Note that all architectures are not listed for each package: I took
> archs where at least one binary package exists (or all if one
> arch-independant binary package exists).
>
arch-independant packages are not rebuilt by binary
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 09:00:15 -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Author: smimram
> Date: Fri Feb 15 09:00:14 2008
> New Revision: 5174
>
> URL: http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/pkg-ocaml-maint/?sc=1&rev=5174
> Log:
> Add a dependency from ocaml-base to libx11-dev.
>
That's wrong afaict, the dependen
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 13:02:44 +0100, Stephane Glondu wrote:
> BTW, is there a way to get pending binNMUs?
>
Most scheduled binNMUs are listed at
http://ftp-master.debian.org/~vorlon/transition-binnmus.txt.
However, now other people are able to schedule them, there's also
http://ftp-master.debia
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 20:32:14 +0100, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
> It seems that libx11-6 provides the binary libX11.so.6.2.0, but
> libX11.so (which is a symbolic link to this file) is in libx11-dev.
>
> Maybe the dependency libx11-6 should be changed to libx11-dev?
>
No, that dependency is creat
reassign 465241 aptitude
kthxbye
On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 17:12:09 +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> reopen 465241
> thanks
>
> On 2008-02-11 15:41:43 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 12:29:36 +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > > Note: I'm n
Thanks for working on that, Stéphane!
On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 23:20:06 +0100, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
> lablgl_1.03-1, Rebuild with ocaml 3.10.1, 1, alpha amd64 arm armel hppa i386
> ia64 m68k mips mipsel powerpc s390 sparc
> lablgtk2_2.10.0-4, Rebuild with ocaml 3.10.1, 1, alpha amd64 arm armel
FWIW, there seems to be a patch for the arm ocamlopt bug (attached).
On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 16:28:53 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> --
> bacam - 2008-02-10 16:28
> -
On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 11:44:11 +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> Then, out of curiosity, why you have long "Architecture:" line for
> ocamlgsl?
>
According to Packages-arch-specific:
%ocamlgsl: !hppa !sparc # [ANAIS] upstream and alignment issues
Cheers,
Julien
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, e
On Wed, Jan 9, 2008 at 22:39:20 +0100, Ralf Treinen wrote:
> I just see hat ocaml depends on ocaml-base-nox. however we do not
> seem to have a versionend ocaml package, so one would still need
> a dependency on ocaml-base-nox.N.NN.N to specify the version.
>
eh? the ocaml package is versioned l
On Wed, Jan 9, 2008 at 22:20:34 +0100, Ralf Treinen wrote:
> My package depends on ocaml-base-nox-3.10.0. The lintian check is
> obviously wrong since it does not allow for a versionend
> ocaml-base-nox package. I wonder what the right check would be:
>
> - if I undestand correctly the dependen
On Tue, Jan 8, 2008 at 02:06:50 -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Author: glondu-guest
> Date: Tue Jan 8 02:06:49 2008
> New Revision: 5035
>
> URL: http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/pkg-ocaml-maint/?sc=1&rev=5035
> Log:
> * New upstream release.
> * Compatibility with dash in debian/rules.
> * Put
On Fri, Jan 4, 2008 at 13:37:45 +0100, David MENTRE wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to compile my OCaml program under Ubuntu Gutsy. The program
> was compiling fine under Ubuntu Feisty.
>
> Apparently, ocamlrpcgen no longer recognises command line options:
>
> $ ocamlrpcgen -cpp none -int unbo
On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 20:24:47 +0100, Ralf Treinen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 09:11:35AM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 08:59:50AM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> > > > I just tried on my home box (amd64/sid), and cannot reproduce the error
> > > >
On Mon, Dec 10, 2007 at 15:02:13 +0100, Enrico Tassi wrote:
> I heard that there was intention to drop native compilers on many
> architecture like ia64 cause it is buggy... I don't remember if alpha
> was one scheduled for removal. If it is not schedule for removal, please
> take a look at this l
On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 21:25:17 +0200, George Danchev wrote:
> * ara build depends on camlp4 (for a long time), which is a virtual
> package
well no, it isn't.
camlp4 | 3.10.0-8 | testing | alpha, amd64, arm, hppa, i386, ia64,
mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc
camlp4 | 3.10.0
On Sat, Nov 3, 2007 at 15:22:51 +0100, Romain Beauxis wrote:
> Hi ocaml maintainers !
>
> I have published two ocaml modules that I'd like to team maintain.
>
> The ITPs are #448886 and #44.
>
> I'll be glad if you could add me to the alioth project (login toots).
>
> Thanks by adva
Package: ocaml-syck
Version: 0.1.1-1
Severity: serious
See
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=ocaml-syck&arch=hppa&ver=0.1.1-1&stamp=1192820955&file=log&as=raw
*.a files aren't built on architectures lacking a native compiler, so
shouldn't be installed.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Descript
On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 09:06:01 +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp$ git clone
> 'http://git.debian.org/?p=collab-maint/graphviz.git;a=summary'
> Initialized empty Git repository in /tmp/graphviz.git;a=summary/.git/
> Cannot get remote repository information.
> Perh
On Mon, Oct 1, 2007 at 11:15:48 +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> John,
> do you have any explanation for the felix test failure on arm? Here is
> some logs you can look at:
> http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?&pkg=felix&ver=1.1.3-2&arch=arm&stamp=1190987953&file=log
>
> I actually don't rem
On Sun, Sep 30, 2007 at 17:04:03 +0200, spiral voice wrote:
> Hi,
>
> it seems you are the first person using MLDonkey on Alpha for a long
> time;-)
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] doesn't go to the bug submitter.
> I need some informations about your system:
>
> In /home/sacha-utf/.mldonkey/downloads.ini p
On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 13:40:27 +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> You mean, I guess, that all that other 50 packages are ocaml-related and
> can't be installed for the same reason above, right? If you have the
> list at hand can you please let me (or [EMAIL PROTECTED]) nows
> which packages you
On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 08:57:06 +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> That's interesting, are you thinking at something like the "3pm" manual
> section for Perl modules? Do we have example in our packages of a "3o"
> manpage or something (I remember something like that, but I can't find
> examples r
1 - 100 of 259 matches
Mail list logo
