Re: Buglet in ocaml-ldconf

2002-05-15 Thread Matt Armstrong
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > BTW, Xavier don't likes ocaml-ldconf :((( > > What do you all thing about it ? I basically buy Xavier's argument. I had quite a bit of problems with ocaml not finding .so files, etc. and had to go learn how ocaml-ldconf worked. :-) I have the impressio

Re: Buglet in ocaml-ldconf

2002-05-15 Thread Matt Armstrong
Claudio Sacerdoti Coen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > What I found very annoying of Sven solution is that if you install > a package by hand (Bad Thing TM), the next time you install an > ocaml debian package the entry for the hand-installed one > disappears. This means that you have to learn o

Re: Buglet in ocaml-ldconf

2002-05-15 Thread Matt Armstrong
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Denis Barbier) writes: > On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 07:47:20PM +0200, Claudio Sacerdoti Coen wrote: >> What I found very annoying of Sven solution is that if you >> install a package by hand (Bad Thing TM), >> the next time you install an ocaml debian package the entry >> for t

Re: Buglet in ocaml-ldconf

2002-05-16 Thread Matt Armstrong
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 12:29:46PM -0600, Matt Armstrong wrote: >> >> Yes, I ran into this myself. I'd be nice if hand installed >> packages were supported easily (through findlib or other ways), >> since we can

Re: Buglet in ocaml-ldconf

2002-05-17 Thread Matt Armstrong
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> This is exactly why installing modules under >> /usr/local/lib/ocaml/3.04/ makes sense: when you upgrade to 3.05, >> you can recompile only the modules you want now, and let less used >> modules survive in /usr/local/lib/ocaml/3.04/. If ocaml 3.05 also >

Re: Buglet in ocaml-ldconf

2002-05-15 Thread Matt Armstrong
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > BTW, Xavier don't likes ocaml-ldconf :((( > > What do you all thing about it ? I basically buy Xavier's argument. I had quite a bit of problems with ocaml not finding .so files, etc. and had to go learn how ocaml-ldconf worked. :-) I have the impressi

Re: Buglet in ocaml-ldconf

2002-05-15 Thread Matt Armstrong
Claudio Sacerdoti Coen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > What I found very annoying of Sven solution is that if you install > a package by hand (Bad Thing TM), the next time you install an > ocaml debian package the entry for the hand-installed one > disappears. This means that you have to learn

Re: Buglet in ocaml-ldconf

2002-05-15 Thread Matt Armstrong
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Denis Barbier) writes: > On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 07:47:20PM +0200, Claudio Sacerdoti Coen wrote: >> What I found very annoying of Sven solution is that if you >> install a package by hand (Bad Thing TM), >> the next time you install an ocaml debian package the entry >> for

Re: Buglet in ocaml-ldconf

2002-05-16 Thread Matt Armstrong
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 12:29:46PM -0600, Matt Armstrong wrote: >> >> Yes, I ran into this myself. I'd be nice if hand installed >> packages were supported easily (through findlib or other ways), >> since we c

Re: Buglet in ocaml-ldconf

2002-05-17 Thread Matt Armstrong
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> This is exactly why installing modules under >> /usr/local/lib/ocaml/3.04/ makes sense: when you upgrade to 3.05, >> you can recompile only the modules you want now, and let less used >> modules survive in /usr/local/lib/ocaml/3.04/. If ocaml 3.05 also