Well, response from Xavier, i don't see any quick solution, but the fact
that the rights are at HP may be a good thing. Let's ask Bdale about
this :))
Splitting bignum out of ocaml is not nice, lot of work, and i don't feel
upto it, not in the short time that is.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
-
Quoting Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Well, response from Xavier, i don't see any quick solution, but the fact
that the rights are at HP may be a good thing. Let's ask Bdale about
this :))
Splitting bignum out of ocaml is not nice, lot of work, and i don't feel
upto it, not in the short
On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 11:35:53AM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
Quoting Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Well, response from Xavier, i don't see any quick solution, but the fact
that the rights are at HP may be a good thing. Let's ask Bdale about
this :))
Splitting bignum out of ocaml
On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 11:35:53AM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
You don't need to split it: just remove it entirely and add a comment
in README.Debian.
Calm down :)
Yes, you're right, we can't ship ocaml as it is right now. OTOH BigNum
is really an important library and IMO we should do our
On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 11:42:56AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 11:35:53AM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
You don't need to split it: just remove it entirely and add a comment
in README.Debian.
Calm down :)
Yes, you're right, we can't ship ocaml as it is right
On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 01:21:54PM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
Quoting Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
But, this will happen only after the testing migration is completed, so,
as said, business as usual, there will still be time to make high
priority cleanup later on, if it is needed.
On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 01:21:54PM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
Err, no, we must not allow ocaml 3.07 to enter testing if it violates
policy. Either we get a new license from HP or we repackage ocaml.
Debian policy is not secondary.
Actually ocaml 3.06 have exactly the same problem (cfr
Quoting Stefano Zacchiroli [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 01:21:54PM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
Err, no, we must not allow ocaml 3.07 to enter testing if it violates
policy. Either we get a new license from HP or we repackage ocaml.
Debian policy is not secondary.
Actually
Jérôme Marant [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Quoting Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
But, this will happen only after the testing migration is completed, so,
as said, business as usual, there will still be time to make high
priority cleanup later on, if it is needed.
Err, no, we must not allow
On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 11:00:19AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
Well, response from Xavier, i don't see any quick solution, but the fact
that the rights are at HP may be a good thing. Let's ask Bdale about
this :))
For info, Bdale forwarded my mail to the people who can handle this at
HP, so
Well, response from Xavier, i don't see any quick solution, but the fact
that the rights are at HP may be a good thing. Let's ask Bdale about
this :))
Splitting bignum out of ocaml is not nice, lot of work, and i don't feel
upto it, not in the short time that is.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
-
Quoting Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Well, response from Xavier, i don't see any quick solution, but the fact
that the rights are at HP may be a good thing. Let's ask Bdale about
this :))
Splitting bignum out of ocaml is not nice, lot of work, and i don't feel
upto it, not in the short
On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 11:35:53AM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
Quoting Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Well, response from Xavier, i don't see any quick solution, but the fact
that the rights are at HP may be a good thing. Let's ask Bdale about
this :))
Splitting bignum out of ocaml
On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 11:35:53AM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
You don't need to split it: just remove it entirely and add a comment
in README.Debian.
Calm down :)
Yes, you're right, we can't ship ocaml as it is right now. OTOH BigNum
is really an important library and IMO we should do our
On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 11:42:56AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 11:35:53AM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
You don't need to split it: just remove it entirely and add a comment
in README.Debian.
Calm down :)
Yes, you're right, we can't ship ocaml as it is right
Quoting Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
But, this will happen only after the testing migration is completed, so,
as said, business as usual, there will still be time to make high
priority cleanup later on, if it is needed.
Err, no, we must not allow ocaml 3.07 to enter testing if it violates
On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 11:00:19AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
Well, response from Xavier, i don't see any quick solution, but the fact
that the rights are at HP may be a good thing. Let's ask Bdale about
this :))
For info, Bdale forwarded my mail to the people who can handle this at
HP, so
17 matches
Mail list logo
