Your message dated Thu, 19 Dec 2013 15:21:24 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#731732: fixed in ocamlrss 2.2.1-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #731732,
regarding ocamlrss: FTBFS on bytecode architectures
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt w
Le 17/12/2013 18:15, Prach Pongpanich a écrit :
>> You can simulate a bytecode architecture (weakly) by removing the
>> following files (you are strongly advised to use a chroot):
>> /usr/bin/ocaml*opt*
>> /usr/lib/ocaml/*.cmx*
>
> Thanks for the correct way for simulation.
> I updated it agai
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 4:25 PM, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
> Control: reopen -1
[..]
> No, it's still failing on e.g. ia64:
>> make[1]: Entering directory `/«PKGBUILDDIR»'
>> mkdir -p /«PKGBUILDDIR»/debian/tmp//usr/lib/ocaml
>> /usr/bin/make install
>> make[2]: Entering directory `/«PKGBUILDDIR»'
>>
Processing control commands:
> reopen -1
Bug #731732 {Done: Prach Pongpanich } [src:ocamlrss]
ocamlrss: FTBFS on bytecode architectures
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need to re-add them.
Bug reopened
No lon
Control: reopen -1
Le 17/12/2013 08:21, Debian Bug Tracking System a écrit :
> Your message dated Tue, 17 Dec 2013 07:19:55 +
> with message-id
> and subject line Bug#731732: fixed in ocamlrss 2.2.1-2
> has caused the Debian Bug report #731732,
> regarding ocamlrss: FTBFS on bytecode architec
Your message dated Tue, 17 Dec 2013 07:19:55 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#731732: fixed in ocamlrss 2.2.1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #731732,
regarding ocamlrss: FTBFS on bytecode architectures
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt w
6 matches
Mail list logo
