Bug#819341: Ping and updated patches

2019-11-16 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Hello, Le 15/11/2019 à 18:02, Anton Avramov a écrit : > Will this get added to debian packages, so we can use unison-fsmonitor? Sorry for not being responsive. I will update unison and try to add unison-fsmonitor after the ocaml transition [1] is done. [1]

Bug#819341: Ping and updated patches

2019-11-15 Thread Anton Avramov
Dear maintainer, Will this get added to debian packages, so we can use unison-fsmonitor? Thank you for all your work.

Bug#819341: Ping and updated patches

2019-02-19 Thread Benjamin Riefenstahl
Stéphane Glondu writes: > Isn't python-foo (here, python-unison-fsmonitor) the naming convention > for stuff implemented in Python? No idea, is it? ;-) > Also, why provide both versions? How, as a user, do I choose between > them? The descriptions are not very explanatory... In theory both

Bug#819341: Ping and updated patches

2019-02-19 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Le 19/02/2019 à 12:24, Benjamin Riefenstahl a écrit : > I'm interested in getting this integrated. The Python version of > fsmonitor does seem to be flaky, the OCaml version seems better. I > prefer it to be packaged in Debian. > > I have updated John's patch above and based it on the current

Bug#819341: Ping and updated patches

2019-02-19 Thread Benjamin Riefenstahl
I'm interested in getting this integrated. The Python version of fsmonitor does seem to be flaky, the OCaml version seems better. I prefer it to be packaged in Debian. I have updated John's patch above and based it on the current Git in https://salsa.debian.org/ocaml-team/unison.git . What