> > Are you sure the man pages you are using were generated by ocaml 3.07 ?
> > Man pages extension for ocaml stdlib changed from .3 to .3o in ocaml 3.07,
> > and it seems you're using old .3 files.
>
> I still get :
>
> $ man -k StdLabels
> StdLabels (3o) - Standard labeled libraries.
> > Are you sure the man pages you are using were generated by ocaml 3.07 ?
> > Man pages extension for ocaml stdlib changed from .3 to .3o in ocaml 3.07,
> > and it seems you're using old .3 files.
>
> I still get :
>
> $ man -k StdLabels
> StdLabels (3o) - Standard labeled libraries.
On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 09:20:49AM +0200, Maxence Guesdon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 03:30:17PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> >
> > > It seems that of the 5 remaining ocaml bugs, 205391 (manpage conflict)
> > > is fixed, but 211190 (printer in ocamldebug) is not, nor is 183936
> > >
Hi,
> On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 03:30:17PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> > It seems that of the 5 remaining ocaml bugs, 205391 (manpage conflict)
> > is fixed, but 211190 (printer in ocamldebug) is not, nor is 183936
> > (whatis manpage stuff), nor are the 2 wishlist bugs.
> >
> > I remember some
On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 09:20:49AM +0200, Maxence Guesdon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 03:30:17PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> >
> > > It seems that of the 5 remaining ocaml bugs, 205391 (manpage conflict)
> > > is fixed, but 211190 (printer in ocamldebug) is not, nor is 183936
> > >
Hi,
> On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 03:30:17PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> > It seems that of the 5 remaining ocaml bugs, 205391 (manpage conflict)
> > is fixed, but 211190 (printer in ocamldebug) is not, nor is 183936
> > (whatis manpage stuff), nor are the 2 wishlist bugs.
> >
> > I remember some
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 09:48:41PM +0200, Ralf Treinen wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 03:30:17PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> > nor are the 2 wishlist bugs.
>
> Did you forward them to upstream? There is no mention about this in
> the BTS.
I think yes, i tagged them upstream, so i must have.
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 03:30:17PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> nor are the 2 wishlist bugs.
Did you forward them to upstream? There is no mention about this in
the BTS.
-Ralf.
--
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 03:30:17PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> It seems that of the 5 remaining ocaml bugs, 205391 (manpage conflict)
> is fixed, but 211190 (printer in ocamldebug) is not, nor is 183936
> (whatis manpage stuff), nor are the 2 wishlist bugs.
>
> I remember some discussion about th
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 09:48:41PM +0200, Ralf Treinen wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 03:30:17PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> > nor are the 2 wishlist bugs.
>
> Did you forward them to upstream? There is no mention about this in
> the BTS.
I think yes, i tagged them upstream, so i must have.
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 03:30:17PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> nor are the 2 wishlist bugs.
Did you forward them to upstream? There is no mention about this in
the BTS.
-Ralf.
--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 03:30:17PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> It seems that of the 5 remaining ocaml bugs, 205391 (manpage conflict)
> is fixed, but 211190 (printer in ocamldebug) is not, nor is 183936
> (whatis manpage stuff), nor are the 2 wishlist bugs.
>
> I remember some discussion about th
Hello,
It seems that of the 5 remaining ocaml bugs, 205391 (manpage conflict)
is fixed, but 211190 (printer in ocamldebug) is not, nor is 183936
(whatis manpage stuff), nor are the 2 wishlist bugs.
I remember some discussion about this whatis issue, but can't find it
back. Do anyone remember some
Hello,
It seems that of the 5 remaining ocaml bugs, 205391 (manpage conflict)
is fixed, but 211190 (printer in ocamldebug) is not, nor is 183936
(whatis manpage stuff), nor are the 2 wishlist bugs.
I remember some discussion about this whatis issue, but can't find it
back. Do anyone remember some
14 matches
Mail list logo