On 15/03/2011 17:30, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
Hello,
I would like to apply to the ocaml package in Debian the patch I
submitted at [1], even though it has been rejected upstream.
+1. Thanks for your work.
I am planning to upload ocaml 3.12.0 with this patch unless there is
strong objection,
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 05:30:16PM +0100, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like to apply to the ocaml package in Debian the patch I
> submitted at [1], even though it has been rejected upstream.
Patch looks sensible, but I'm curious, I can't find why it was
rejected upstream. From a F
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 06:15:18PM +0100, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
> Le 15/03/2011 17:58, Richard W.M. Jones a écrit :
> >>I would like to apply to the ocaml package in Debian the patch I
> >>submitted at [1], even though it has been rejected upstream.
> >
> >Patch looks sensible, but I'm curious, I
Le 15/03/2011 17:58, Richard W.M. Jones a écrit :
I would like to apply to the ocaml package in Debian the patch I
submitted at [1], even though it has been rejected upstream.
Patch looks sensible, but I'm curious, I can't find why it was
rejected upstream. From a Fedora POV we'd much prefer s
Hello,
I would like to apply to the ocaml package in Debian the patch I
submitted at [1], even though it has been rejected upstream.
I still agree that -custom should be avoided when possible... but
contrarily to Xavier, I don't think it is always possible *and relevant*
in practice. I'm thi
5 matches
Mail list logo
