On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 07:54:33PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> No problem, i read the testing FAQ, and it seems my guesses would be ok.
> I think we can ask for the removal (it is even documented in the FAQ) as
> soon as we have Stefano's approval.
Approved!
> How do we best go about this ? Do yo
On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 09:11:54PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> If it is all the same to you, i can do this, and sign the mail as both
> of you, and cc you to ?
Ok, go for it.
Cheers.
--
Stefano Zacchiroli - Undergraduate Student of CS @ Uni. Bologna, Italy
[EMAIL PROTECTED],debian.org,bononia
On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 07:54:33PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> No problem, i read the testing FAQ, and it seems my guesses would be ok.
> I think we can ask for the removal (it is even documented in the FAQ) as
> soon as we have Stefano's approval.
Approved!
> How do we best go about this ? Do yo
On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 09:11:54PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> If it is all the same to you, i can do this, and sign the mail as both
> of you, and cc you to ?
Ok, go for it.
Cheers.
--
Stefano Zacchiroli - Undergraduate Student of CS @ Uni. Bologna, Italy
[EMAIL PROTECTED],debian.org,bononia
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I guess we have to file bug reports again ftp.debian.org.
>
> A yes, altough it is the same as writing to ftp-masters, and
>
> http://www.debian.org/devel/testing#faq
>
> says (sorry for the french, if you want it in your local, just follow
> the above
On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 08:41:56PM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
> >> Sorry, I don't have access to IRC currently. And last time I asked about
> >> testing scripts, I've been bashed.
> >
> > No problem, i read the testing FAQ, and it seems my guesses w
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Sorry, I don't have access to IRC currently. And last time I asked about
>> testing scripts, I've been bashed.
>
> No problem, i read the testing FAQ, and it seems my guesses would be ok.
> I think we can ask for the removal (it is even documented in th
On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 05:28:10PM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> En réponse à Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
> > > OK. Let's go for it.
> >
> > Let's wait for Stefano's response too, and let's check first that
> > there
> > are no missing problems. Could you ask on irc about the testing
>
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I guess we have to file bug reports again ftp.debian.org.
>
> A yes, altough it is the same as writing to ftp-masters, and
>
> http://www.debian.org/devel/testing#faq
>
> says (sorry for the french, if you want it in your local, just follow
> the above
On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 08:41:56PM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
> >> Sorry, I don't have access to IRC currently. And last time I asked about
> >> testing scripts, I've been bashed.
> >
> > No problem, i read the testing FAQ, and it seems my guesses w
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Sorry, I don't have access to IRC currently. And last time I asked about
>> testing scripts, I've been bashed.
>
> No problem, i read the testing FAQ, and it seems my guesses would be ok.
> I think we can ask for the removal (it is even documented in th
On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 05:28:10PM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> En réponse à Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
> > > OK. Let's go for it.
> >
> > Let's wait for Stefano's response too, and let's check first that
> > there
> > are no missing problems. Could you ask on irc about the testing
>
En réponse à Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > OK. Let's go for it.
>
> Let's wait for Stefano's response too, and let's check first that
> there
> are no missing problems. Could you ask on irc about the testing
> scripts,
> and if it is true that it does only check the dependencies and not t
On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 04:35:15PM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> En réponse à Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > > How would removing ocamsdl from testing solve problem?
> > > (if it solves problem, then I'm OK from removing it)
> >
> > If ocamlsdl is no more in testing, then ocaml 3.06 will
En réponse à Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > How would removing ocamsdl from testing solve problem?
> > (if it solves problem, then I'm OK from removing it)
>
> If ocamlsdl is no more in testing, then ocaml 3.06 will not break the
> version of ocamlsdl that is in testing, and will thus enter
En réponse à Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 11:19:57AM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have the pleasure to announced that cameleon has been finaly
> > built on ARM, after months of pain.
>
> Note that i did ask on debian-arm last friday or so, and got a
On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 03:26:59PM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> En réponse à Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > > ocamlsdl : sdl-mixer1.2 is not ready to enter testing because of
> > the
> > > libvorbis mess. The problem seems to have been solved, but other
> > > packages may hinder eit
En réponse à Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > ocamlsdl : sdl-mixer1.2 is not ready to enter testing because of
> the
> > libvorbis mess. The problem seems to have been solved, but other
> > packages may hinder either sdl-mixer1.2 or libvorbis to enter
> testing.
> >
> > libpgsql-ocaml
En réponse à Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > OK. Let's go for it.
>
> Let's wait for Stefano's response too, and let's check first that
> there
> are no missing problems. Could you ask on irc about the testing
> scripts,
> and if it is true that it does only check the dependencies and not t
On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 04:35:15PM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> En réponse à Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > > How would removing ocamsdl from testing solve problem?
> > > (if it solves problem, then I'm OK from removing it)
> >
> > If ocamlsdl is no more in testing, then ocaml 3.06 will
En réponse à Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > How would removing ocamsdl from testing solve problem?
> > (if it solves problem, then I'm OK from removing it)
>
> If ocamlsdl is no more in testing, then ocaml 3.06 will not break the
> version of ocamlsdl that is in testing, and will thus enter
En réponse à Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 11:19:57AM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have the pleasure to announced that cameleon has been finaly
> > built on ARM, after months of pain.
>
> Note that i did ask on debian-arm last friday or so, and got a
On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 03:26:59PM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> En réponse à Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > > ocamlsdl : sdl-mixer1.2 is not ready to enter testing because of
> > the
> > > libvorbis mess. The problem seems to have been solved, but other
> > > packages may hinder eit
En réponse à Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > ocamlsdl : sdl-mixer1.2 is not ready to enter testing because of
> the
> > libvorbis mess. The problem seems to have been solved, but other
> > packages may hinder either sdl-mixer1.2 or libvorbis to enter
> testing.
> >
> > libpgsql-ocaml
On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 11:19:57AM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have the pleasure to announced that cameleon has been finaly
> built on ARM, after months of pain.
Note that i did ask on debian-arm last friday or so, and got a response
there, i thought you did also, didn't you ?
Ok, Th
On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 11:19:57AM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have the pleasure to announced that cameleon has been finaly
> built on ARM, after months of pain.
Note that i did ask on debian-arm last friday or so, and got a response
there, i thought you did also, didn't you ?
Ok, Th
26 matches
Mail list logo