Hello,
I am very pleased to announce that transition to OCaml 3.11.1 in
Ubuntu Karmic is now completed!
http://bentobako.org/ubuntu-ocaml-status/transition_monitor/ocaml_transition_monitor.html
Many thanks to (in order of appearance):
* Ubuntu side:
James Wetsby
Andrea Gasparini
Hello,
For information, Ubuntu Karmic is transitioning to OCaml 3.11.1. The
whole plan is here:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel-discuss/2009-July/009088.html
We are currently in round 2.
Yours,
d.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ocaml-maint-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
Michael Bienia a écrit :
> What's the current plan for Ocaml in Karmic? Update to 3.11.1 or stay
> with 3.11.0?
David Mentré is the only one having expressed interest about OCaml in
Ubuntu, and he didn't want to commit to 3.11.1 before the transition is
over in Debian and was even against initiati
On 2009-06-12 22:06:20 +0200, David MENTRE wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 20:07, Sylvain Le Gall wrote:
> > I think we are too tigh regarding time. I prefer that Ubuntu ship a good
> > 3.11.0 release than to have to fight for months to get a 3.11.1.
>
> I need to think a bit more about this but
Stéphane Glondu wrote:
Hi releasers,
Hi
Sorry for the delay in replying.
A new upstream version of OCaml has been released, and our team is ready
to start the transition to this new version.
We plan to go ahead and upload ocaml 3.11.1 itself (the package) very
soon. As usual, this will bre
Romain Beauxis a écrit :
> Please do not binNMU ocaml-duppy, we will release a new upstream version and
> do a sourceful upload afterwards..
Noted in the TODO list:
http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/OCamlTaskForce/OCamlTransitions
If anyone has another no-go for the binNMU, please update the page
Le mercredi 17 juin 2009 13:49:19, Stéphane Glondu a écrit :
> Please let us know if you have any problem with such plan. An approval
> mail will also be welcome!
Approved !
Please do not binNMU ocaml-duppy, we will release a new upstream version and
do a sourceful upload afterwards..
Romain
[ please keep the Cc to d-o-m ]
Hi releasers,
A new upstream version of OCaml has been released, and our team is ready
to start the transition to this new version.
We plan to go ahead and upload ocaml 3.11.1 itself (the package) very
soon. As usual, this will break (almost) all OCaml-related pac
Stefano Zacchiroli a écrit :
>>> However, I'd like to propose an extra item to take care of during this
>>> transition. Namely: moving our standard library to /usr/lib/ocaml/.
>> I see no objection.
>
> Indeed, we can consider it approved then.
> I believe the changes needed are just in ocaml and
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 10:56:58PM +0200, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
> > However, I'd like to propose an extra item to take care of during this
> > transition. Namely: moving our standard library to /usr/lib/ocaml/.
> I see no objection.
Indeed, we can consider it approved then.
I believe the changes
On 16-06-2009, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
> Stefano Zacchiroli a écrit :
>> Eya, sorry for the delay. No problem with the transition, I agree with
>> the proposed plan.
>>
>> However, I'd like to propose an extra item to take care of during this
>> transition. Namely: moving our standard library to /
Stefano Zacchiroli a écrit :
> Eya, sorry for the delay. No problem with the transition, I agree with
> the proposed plan.
>
> However, I'd like to propose an extra item to take care of during this
> transition. Namely: moving our standard library to /usr/lib/ocaml/.
I see no objection.
> Finall
Hello,
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 02:15:00PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 03:28:25PM +0200, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
> > I've updated the previous transition page:
> > http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/OCamlTaskForce/OCamlTransitions
> However, I'd like to propose an extra ite
Hello Stefano,
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 18:35, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 04:45:22PM +0200, David MENTRE wrote:
>> This is possible. I have opened the proper bug and I am waiting for
>> the blocking to be done by ubuntu-archive people.
>
> Wonderful, thanks!
>
> Please let
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 04:45:22PM +0200, David MENTRE wrote:
> This is possible. I have opened the proper bug and I am waiting for
> the blocking to be done by ubuntu-archive people.
Wonderful, thanks!
Please let us know when the block is in place.
Cheers.
--
Stefano Zacchiroli -o- PhD in Comp
Hello Stefano,
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 15:22, David MENTRE wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 15:16, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
>> Note that this does not mean I don't respect your work to keep OCaml
>> in shape on Ubuntu; quite the contrary: I deeply respect it and I've
>> always thanked you for tha
Hello Stefano,
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 15:16, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> Note that this does not mean I don't respect your work to keep OCaml
> in shape on Ubuntu; quite the contrary: I deeply respect it and I've
> always thanked you for that. But I see needs like yours coming
> (hopefully!) more
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 02:25:55PM +0200, David MENTRE wrote:
> Would it be possible to delay the import of the new packages in
> unstable after the 25th of June in order to avoid its import in
> Ubuntu?
Sorry, but I don't consider this acceptable. Even if in this case the
delay would be minimal,
Hello,
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 14:15, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> Eya, sorry for the delay. No problem with the transition, I agree with
> the proposed plan.
Would it be possible to delay the import of the new packages in
unstable after the 25th of June in order to avoid its import in
Ubuntu?
Yo
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 03:28:25PM +0200, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
> I've updated the previous transition page:
> http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/OCamlTaskForce/OCamlTransitions
Eya, sorry for the delay. No problem with the transition, I agree with
the proposed plan.
However, I'd like to propose an ex
Hello Sylvain,
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 20:07, Sylvain Le Gall wrote:
> I think we are too tigh regarding time. I prefer that Ubuntu ship a good
> 3.11.0 release than to have to fight for months to get a 3.11.1.
I need to think a bit more about this but looking at the amount of
work I should do or
Hello,
On 12-06-2009, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
> David MENTRE a écrit :
>> Regarding Ubuntu, the Debian Import Freeze is set to the 25th of June.
>> After that date, packages can be synchronized upon request until the
>> 13th of August.
>> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KarmicReleaseSchedule
>>
>> Curr
Hello Stéphane,
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 16:37, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
> I don't know either how Ubuntu manages this
> kind of task
For the record, I've started a thread regarding those issues in Ubuntu:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel-discuss/2009-June/thread.html#8656
Yours,
d
David MENTRE a écrit :
> Regarding Ubuntu, the Debian Import Freeze is set to the 25th of June.
> After that date, packages can be synchronized upon request until the
> 13th of August.
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KarmicReleaseSchedule
>
> Currently, nearly all (i.e. except 3 packages) are on 3.11.
Hello Stéphane,
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 15:28, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
> I suggest to ask the release team and proceed with uploading of ocaml to
> unstable right away (after their approval), then wait one week or so to
> figure out what needs sourceful upload and upload whatever is relevant,
> and
Hello,
I've updated the previous transition page:
http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/OCamlTaskForce/OCamlTransitions
I've put there some packages that need sourceful upload, please add
yours if you have any (arch:all packages are not all there yet, and it's
the ideal time to push new versions of libra
26 matches
Mail list logo
