Re: binNMU requests for the OCaml 3.10.1 transition

2008-03-08 Thread Luk Claes
Julien Cristau wrote: Hi, Hi the following packages, involved in the current ocaml transition, should be given back (they failed on the first attempt because of missing dep-waits): First a general note: please include version numbers (pkg_version). cameleon: alpha arm armel hppa ia64 mips

Re: binNMU requests for the OCaml 3.10.1 transition

2008-03-07 Thread Julien Cristau
Hi, the following packages, involved in the current ocaml transition, should be given back (they failed on the first attempt because of missing dep-waits): cameleon: alpha arm armel hppa ia64 mips mipsel powerpc sparc Dep-Wait libpcre-ocaml-dev ( 5.12.2-3), libxml-light-ocaml-dev ( 2.2-8)

Re: binNMU requests for the OCaml 3.10.1 transition

2008-02-26 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 12:26:25PM +0100, Stéphane Glondu wrote: Rebuilding of ocamlnet failed. As far a I can tell, the reason is ocamlnet depends on lablgtk2 and pcre-ocaml, but these dependencies do not appear in http://pkg-ocaml-maint.alioth.debian.org/build_order.txt. But they do appear

Re: binNMU requests for the OCaml 3.10.1 transition

2008-02-25 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Steve Langasek a écrit : BinNMUs scheduled [...] Rebuilding of ocamlnet failed. As far a I can tell, the reason is ocamlnet depends on lablgtk2 and pcre-ocaml, but these dependencies do not appear in http://pkg-ocaml-maint.alioth.debian.org/build_order.txt. This seems to be the main blocker so

Re: binNMU requests for the OCaml 3.10.1 transition

2008-02-25 Thread Julien Cristau
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 12:26:25 +0100, Stéphane Glondu wrote: We could either ask again to binNMU ocamlnet, or just do a sourceful upload... Better just wait, it'll be retried at some point anyway. Cheers, Julien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of

Re: binNMU requests for the OCaml 3.10.1 transition

2008-02-22 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Stefano Zacchiroli a écrit : - Stephane, can you please fix the script? Done. -- Stéphane

Re: binNMU requests for the OCaml 3.10.1 transition

2008-02-22 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 01:25:16AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: BinNMUs scheduled, Many thanks Steve! \o/ however a number of these packages appear to be arch: all bytecode and therefore cannot be binNMUed: headache, ocamlwc, planets, polygen, ledit, cmigrep Yep, we spotted this as a

Re: binNMU requests for the OCaml 3.10.1 transition

2008-02-22 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 03:42:19PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: Hi releasers, below you can find the binNMU requests for the transition to OCaml 3.10.1. They are intermixed with the needed dep-waits; the latter are assuming that +b1 is the binNMU obtained fulfilling our requests. Can

Re: binNMU requests for the OCaml 3.10.1 transition

2008-02-21 Thread Samuel Mimram
Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 03:42:19PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: Can someone please schedule them? Any news? Apparently not... It would be very nice if the binNMUs could be scheduled soon since all the packages depending (directly or indirectly) on ocaml are

Re: binNMU requests for the OCaml 3.10.1 transition

2008-02-19 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 03:42:19PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: Can someone please schedule them? Any news? -- Stefano Zacchiroli -*- PhD in Computer Science ... now what? [EMAIL PROTECTED],cs.unibo.it,debian.org} -%- http://upsilon.cc/zack/ (15:56:48) Zack: e la demo dema ?

binNMU requests for the OCaml 3.10.1 transition

2008-02-15 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
Hi releasers, below you can find the binNMU requests for the transition to OCaml 3.10.1. They are intermixed with the needed dep-waits; the latter are assuming that +b1 is the binNMU obtained fulfilling our requests. Can someone please schedule them? The whole list is also available at http