[ silent lurking as usual ]
(in particular I could do that for the coq package which is quite big
and takes a long time to build).
Notice that it will only work if there are no C bindings in the package,
There is no C in the current version of Coq and there will be no C
in the next
On Wed, Oct 27, 2004 at 02:53:00PM +0200, Berke Durak wrote:
On Wed, Oct 27, 2004 at 03:47:15PM +0300, George Danchev wrote:
Err, make builds bytecode versions ; make opt builds native versions named
.opt. Have you checked this ?
Ah, sorry ;-)
I've corrected this in the same
On Wednesday 27 October 2004 15:53, Berke Durak wrote:
On Wed, Oct 27, 2004 at 03:47:15PM +0300, George Danchev wrote:
Err, make builds bytecode versions ; make opt builds native versions
named .opt. Have you checked this ?
Ah, sorry ;-)
I've corrected this in the same version 1.0.1,
I'd suggest:
make builds the native code - ara xara
make bt builds the bytecode - ara.bt xara.bt
Sounds reasonable, just keep in mind that some arches do not have a native
code compiler, and that the package should fall back on building bytecode in
this case.
Friendly,
Sven
On Wed, Oct 27, 2004 at 07:32:00PM +0300, George Danchev wrote:
On Wednesday 27 October 2004 16:17, Berke Durak wrote:
I'd suggest:
make builds the native code - ara xara
make bt builds the bytecode - ara.bt xara.bt
Sounds reasonable, just keep in mind that some arches do not
Hello,
I have a few comments on your control file, I might be wrong since I
don't really know ara :
* if you don't need the Graphics or Tk modules, you should depend on the
-nox versions of the packages (in particular for ara which does not
require X, I guess). Anyway you don't need to depend
On Wed, Oct 27, 2004 at 07:21:45PM +0200, Samuel Mimram wrote:
Hello,
I have a few comments on your control file, I might be wrong since I
don't really know ara :
* if you don't need the Graphics or Tk modules, you should depend on the
-nox versions of the packages (in particular for ara
On Wed, Oct 27, 2004 at 09:13:25PM +0200, Berke Durak wrote:
Hello all,
On Wed, Oct 27, 2004 at 09:06:33PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Wed, Oct 27, 2004 at 07:21:45PM +0200, Samuel Mimram wrote:
Hello,
I have a few comments on your control file, I might be wrong since I
don't
Hello all,
On Wed, Oct 27, 2004 at 09:06:33PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Wed, Oct 27, 2004 at 07:21:45PM +0200, Samuel Mimram wrote:
Hello,
I have a few comments on your control file, I might be wrong since I
don't really know ara :
* if you don't need the Graphics or Tk modules,
On Wed, Oct 27, 2004 at 10:20:36PM +0300, George Danchev wrote:
I've commited my changes to SVN, basically we first check if we can make a
native build, else fallback to bytecode...
if [ -x /usr/bin/ocamlopt ]; then \
$(MAKE); \
else
$(MAKE) bt ; \
Hi,
* You should not build-depend on ocaml-native-compilers since it is not
available on some non-native archs. You could depend on
ocaml-best-compilers but anyway your app is, I guess, small enough not
to require native compilers when available.
I thought so at first, but had second thought
On Wednesday 27 October 2004 20:21, Samuel Mimram wrote:
Hello,
Hello,
I have a few comments on your control file, I might be wrong since I
don't really know ara :
* if you don't need the Graphics or Tk modules, you should depend on the
-nox versions of the packages (in particular for ara
On Wednesday 27 October 2004 22:06, Sven Luther wrote:
On Wed, Oct 27, 2004 at 07:21:45PM +0200, Samuel Mimram wrote:
Hello,
I have a few comments on your control file, I might be wrong since I
don't really know ara :
* if you don't need the Graphics or Tk modules, you should depend on
On Wednesday 27 October 2004 22:13, Berke Durak wrote:
Hello all,
On Wed, Oct 27, 2004 at 09:06:33PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Wed, Oct 27, 2004 at 07:21:45PM +0200, Samuel Mimram wrote:
Hello,
I have a few comments on your control file, I might be wrong since I
don't really
On Wed, Oct 27, 2004 at 09:58:10PM +0300, George Danchev wrote:
* I don't really see the point in providing both ara and ara-byte (and
idem for xara-gtk). You could simply provide an ara package which
contains native ara on archs which support that and bytecode else.
Right. Agreed.
On Wed, Oct 27, 2004 at 10:25:29PM +0200, Samuel Mimram wrote:
Hi,
* You should not build-depend on ocaml-native-compilers since it is not
available on some non-native archs. You could depend on
ocaml-best-compilers but anyway your app is, I guess, small enough not
to require native
16 matches
Mail list logo
