Le Monday 02 February 2009 21:41:40 Stefano Zacchiroli, vous avez écrit :
> > Anyway, the (vast) majority has ruled out the decision. I only hope
> > I will still be able to maintain my packages with svn for the time
> > being...
>
> Nevertheless, I've never wanted to impose my preferences to anybo
On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 05:19:05PM +0100, Romain Beauxis wrote:
> I agree with you. Appart from the complexity that git induces, I
> still don't see at all the benefits of using a distributed CVS for
> simple source trees like packages. It really seems to me that the
> only motivation was a sort of
Hello,
On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 17:19, Romain Beauxis wrote:
> I agree with you. Appart from the complexity that git induces, I still don't
> see at all the benefits of using a distributed CVS for simple source trees
> like packages.
>From my own developer perspective on simple source trees (mainl
Le Monday 02 February 2009 09:33:44 Ralf Treinen, vous avez écrit :
> For relatively simple packages, like hevea, this is an overkill. I do not
> recall how much time I lost on my last attempt with git but it certainly
> was too much. I really appreciate it when I can rebuild the packages I care
>
Hi,
maybe I should say some words why I opposed against converting packages from
svn to git :
http://lists.debian.org/debian-ocaml-maint/2008/11/msg00060.html
Eric (thanks !) at that time helped me to solve that problem: git-buildpackage
just
does not use pristine-tar, despite having passed th
5 matches
Mail list logo
