Oh, it seems [EMAIL PROTECTED] is the canonical address, CCing there.
Hi hppa buildd maintainers. We have a problem with the ocaml packages on hppa,
since the buildd infrastructure is broken and don't handles virtual packages
dependencies all to well. Could you retrigger the build of the below
On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 10:03:57AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
Oh, it seems [EMAIL PROTECTED] is the canonical address, CCing there.
Yeah - I'm not actively reading debian-hppa, if I'm even subscribed to
it.
Hi hppa buildd maintainers. We have a problem with the ocaml packages on hppa,
since
On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 08:00:56AM -0700, LaMont Jones wrote:
On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 10:03:57AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
Oh, it seems [EMAIL PROTECTED] is the canonical address, CCing there.
Yeah - I'm not actively reading debian-hppa, if I'm even subscribed to
it.
Hi hppa buildd
On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 02:16:53AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
CCing debian-release so they are aware of this, but don't think any particular
action they can do about this, not sure though.
If you're going to cc: debian-release to make us aware of something, it
would be useful if you would
On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 06:18:11PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 02:16:53AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
CCing debian-release so they are aware of this, but don't think any
particular
action they can do about this, not sure though.
If you're going to cc:
Hello,
I missed Samuel and Sylvain earlier on irc, but i have done some thinking
about the problematic cases of the hppa/ia64 buildds. I have written to both
debian-hppa and debian-ia64 a week or so ago, but received no reply, so i
would say let's just ignore those, and go ahead with the
6 matches
Mail list logo
