Le Tuesday 16 December 2008 13:15:43 Stefano Zacchiroli, vous avez écrit :
> > More precisely, the autobuilder resolution algorithm doesn't do any
> > backward check. Once a resolution has been done, it is never rolled back.
>
> Out of curiosity: do you know who is the responsible for that?
>
> Doe
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 02:06:58PM -0500, Eric Cooper wrote:
> Is there a script driving the rebuild, or are people individually
> uploading their rebuilt packages?
The former, but you can easily automate a rebuild. In fact, if you use
{git,svn}-buildpackage is really just a single command, to be
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 11:48:34PM +0100, Romain Beauxis wrote:
> More precisely, the autobuilder resolution algorithm doesn't do any backward
> check. Once a resolution has been done, it is never rolled back.
Out of curiosity: do you know who is the responsible for that?
Does it boil down to an
Le Monday 15 December 2008 21:02:43 Stéphane Glondu, vous avez écrit :
> > Also, can someone remind me whether library control files should have
> > a versioned build-dep on, say, ocaml-nox (>= 3.11), even if there are
> > no 3.11-specific features in use? I guess it's better for
> > autobuilders,
Eric Cooper a écrit :
> Is there a script driving the rebuild, or are people individually
> uploading their rebuilt packages?
I think toots manually uploads the packages.
> If it's a script, I wanted to check that it will prefer git repos to
> svn, since a couple of my packages are still in both
Is there a script driving the rebuild, or are people individually
uploading their rebuilt packages?
If it's a script, I wanted to check that it will prefer git repos to
svn, since a couple of my packages are still in both places (since the
Lenny package corresponds to what's in svn).
Also, can so
6 matches
Mail list logo
