Evgeni Golov a écrit :
>> BTW, there are many things that shouldn't be in the .orig.tar.gz (such
>> as CVS directories, for a start)... For future releases, it might be
>> relevant to repackage the upstream tarball.
>
> Yupp, but thats a different issue, not relevant here and now :)
Sorry for the
On Thu, 08 Jan 2009 02:05:02 +0100 Stéphane Glondu wrote:
> Evgeni Golov a écrit :
> > Did you also remove the binary from the .orig.tar.gz? We don't have the
> > source for it...
>
> No, I didn't. Even though the source is not technically available (in
> the archive, today), there is an advertis
Evgeni Golov a écrit :
> Did you also remove the binary from the .orig.tar.gz? We don't have the
> source for it...
No, I didn't. Even though the source is not technically available (in
the archive, today), there is an advertised way to rebuild it with only
free tools... IMHO, it is not the same i
On Thu, 08 Jan 2009 01:29:49 +0100 Stéphane Glondu wrote:
> As said in git commit bfd1cebf64a424759df083c1fc15276cc9ea3fff:
> > Do not install ocamldep-omake (Closes: #510919)
> >
> > The build system of omake detects by itself that standard ocamldep
> > supports -modules (starting from OCaml 3.1
I wrote in <4964c23c.7020...@glondu.net>:
>> 1. apply the above mentioned patch against ocamldep as brought with
>> ocaml-nox
>> package. That would be pretty dangerous, since ocaml-nox rdeps are exposed
>> at
>> risk. Unlikely to be approved by the release team.
>
> It seems the patch has alr
5 matches
Mail list logo
