On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 06:14:57PM -0400, Eric Cooper wrote:
> Now, can someone explain the benefit to using pristine-tar in this
> situation? The repo has the upstream source, and git-buildpackage can
> build the orig.tar.gz from it, so where does pristine-tar come in?
It depends on your release
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 12:37:55AM +0200, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
> The proper course of action would be to remove approx.git from /git/...,
> and in a freshly cloned repo, do a "new-d-o-m-git-repo approx".
OK, I've now done this.
The new-d-o-m-git-repo script didn't quite work because the cloned
Eric Cooper wrote:
>> So I did this using my tool, and I got this: [...]
>
> I forgot to mention, your tool did a much better job than git-svn --
> does it make sense to make it more widely available, or offer it as an
> improvement to the git-svn maintainers?
My tool is very specific to our setu
Eric Cooper wrote:
> Thank you very much, Stéphane. That looks much better than my
> attempt, so I've copied it to the official (pkg-ocaml-maint/packages)
> location and will push further development there. Feel free to remove
> your test/ copy.
What do you mean by "copy"? Did you use the new-d-
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 12:34:00PM +0200, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
> So I did this using my tool, and I got this: [...]
I forgot to mention, your tool did a much better job than git-svn --
does it make sense to make it more widely available, or offer it as an
improvement to the git-svn maintainers?
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 12:34:00PM +0200, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
> So I did this using my tool, and I got this:
>
> http://git.debian.org/?p=users/glondu-guest/test/approx.git
>
> Please check it out (and have a look with gitk). Basically, there is an
> "upstream" branch with all changes to any
Stéphane Glondu a écrit :
> [...] IIUC, you want to
> de-debian-nativify it, and in the process, you want to remove all
> history concerning debian/? How do you plan to keep a meaningful history
> of debian packaging? It doesn't sound easy to me to plug the debian/
> history into the upstream histo
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 10:11:37PM +0200, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
> IIUC, you want to de-debian-nativify it, and in the process, you
> want to remove all history concerning debian/? How do you plan to
> keep a meaningful history of debian packaging? It doesn't sound easy
> to me to plug the debian/
Eric Cooper wrote:
> But when I try to run git-buildpackage, it doesn't check out the
> upstream (master) source; it just runs "debuild" in a directory with
> only debian/ in it, which of course fails. What am I missing?
git-buildpackage expects a branch with upstream and debian/ merged. It
uses
I've moved approx from svn to git, but am having trouble now that I've
taken the next step of splitting the debian part from the "upstream"
part.
I have removed all the debian/ stuff from the "master" branch (and set
upstream-branch = "master" in gbp.conf). And I have removed
everything *but* deb
10 matches
Mail list logo
