Package: openoffice.org-debian-files
Version: 1.0.3-2+1
Severity: normal
In the move of OpenOffice.org menu items from the Other menu to the
Office menu, the printer administration and setup menu items were left
behind. At first, I had thought that these were relics from previous
installs, but
Le lun 11/08/2003 à 17:43, Jérôme Warnier a écrit :
> Le lun 11/08/2003 à 16:39, Debian Openoffice CVS a écrit :
> > Repository: oo-deb/debian
> > who:rene
> > time: Mon Aug 11 14:39:37 UTC 2003
> > Log Message:
> > s/libarts/libart/
> >
> >
> > Files:
> > changed:changelog
Le lun 11/08/2003 à 16:39, Debian Openoffice CVS a écrit :
> Repository: oo-deb/debian
> who:rene
> time: Mon Aug 11 14:39:37 UTC 2003
> Log Message:
> s/libarts/libart/
>
>
> Files:
> changed:changelog
Why is it depending upon libart-2.0-dev (>= 2.3.13)? It is not in Woody
Le lun 11/08/2003 à 16:56, Chris Halls a écrit :
> On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 02:04:24PM +0200, Jérôme Warnier wrote:
> > Does it work with fakeroot (without being root) now?
> > That's yet another build problem I find important because I would be
> > forced to allow root access to other people if the
Repository: oo-deb/debian
who:halls
time: Mon Aug 11 15:13:08 UTC 2003
Log Message:
Change compiler Build-Depends to
g++-3.3 (>= 1:3.3.1-1) | g++-3.0 [!powerpc]
Files:
changed:changelog control control.in
On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 02:04:24PM +0200, Jérôme Warnier wrote:
> Does it work with fakeroot (without being root) now?
> That's yet another build problem I find important because I would be
> forced to allow root access to other people if they have to help me with
> the patches.
> I know I could us
Repository: oo-deb/debian
who:rene
time: Mon Aug 11 14:47:48 UTC 2003
Log Message:
we are OpenOffice.org, not XFree86 :)
Files:
changed:copyright
Repository: oo-deb/debian
who:rene
time: Mon Aug 11 14:41:27 UTC 2003
Log Message:
oops, accidentially checked it the openoffice.org-dev changelog entry
too, not ready yet..
Files:
changed:changelog
Repository: oo-deb/debian
who:rene
time: Mon Aug 11 14:39:37 UTC 2003
Log Message:
s/libarts/libart/
Files:
changed:changelog
Repository: oo-deb/debian/patches
who:halls
time: Mon Aug 11 13:28:30 UTC 2003
Log Message:
Remove patches integrated upstream in rc3
Files:
removed:023_jdk_kaffe.diff 040_newlangs.diff
Repository: oo-deb/debian/patches
who:halls
time: Mon Aug 11 13:26:26 UTC 2003
Log Message:
Patch was only for 1.0.x packages - remove
Files:
removed:020_remove_gpc.diff
Repository: oo-deb/debian/patches
who:haggai
time: Mon Aug 11 12:12:35 UTC 2003
Log Message:
Remove obsolete 1.0.x patches
Files:
removed:036_product_gcc323_libstdc33.diff
037_fix_build_with_new_stlport.diff 040_flex_2_5_31_fixes.diff
041_fix_quickstart_mode.diff 042_finni
Does it work with fakeroot (without being root) now?
That's yet another build problem I find important because I would be
forced to allow root access to other people if they have to help me with
the patches.
I know I could use sudo.
(Chris, could you update your download instructions for building
Repository: oo-deb/debian
who:halls
time: Mon Aug 11 12:04:16 UTC 2003
Log Message:
+ Tighten g++ Build-Depends to >= 3:3.3-2 on unstable because earlier
gcc-3.3 versions were too buggy
Files:
changed:changelog control control.in
Repository: oo-deb/debian/scripts
who:halls
time: Mon Aug 11 11:41:40 UTC 2003
Log Message:
openoffice.org (1.0.99+1.1rc2pre3-0pre1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream snapshot
+ Printing of 3D objects finally works! we now use libarts,
thanks to code contribu
Repository: oo-deb/debian
who:halls
time: Mon Aug 11 11:41:40 UTC 2003
Log Message:
openoffice.org (1.0.99+1.1rc2pre3-0pre1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream snapshot
+ Printing of 3D objects finally works! we now use libarts,
thanks to code contributed by X
Repository: oo-deb/debian/patches
who:halls
time: Mon Aug 11 11:41:40 UTC 2003
Log Message:
openoffice.org (1.0.99+1.1rc2pre3-0pre1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream snapshot
+ Printing of 3D objects finally works! we now use libarts,
thanks to code contribu
Repository: oo-deb/debian/scripts
who:haggai
time: Mon Aug 11 11:31:31 UTC 2003
Log Message:
Move changes from OPENOFFICE_ORG_1_1 branch, tag openoffice_org-1_0_99-1_1rc-1
to HEAD now that the packages are the current 'openoffice.org'
Files:
changed:patch.unapply vars vars
Repository: oo-deb/debian/po
who:haggai
time: Mon Aug 11 11:31:31 UTC 2003
Log Message:
Move changes from OPENOFFICE_ORG_1_1 branch, tag openoffice_org-1_0_99-1_1rc-1
to HEAD now that the packages are the current 'openoffice.org'
Files:
added: POTFILES.in de.po templates.
Repository: oo-deb/debian/patches
who:haggai
time: Mon Aug 11 11:31:31 UTC 2003
Log Message:
Move changes from OPENOFFICE_ORG_1_1 branch, tag openoffice_org-1_0_99-1_1rc-1
to HEAD now that the packages are the current 'openoffice.org'
Files:
changed:021_SAL_DEBUG.diff 032_
Repository: oo-deb/debian
who:haggai
time: Mon Aug 11 11:31:30 UTC 2003
Log Message:
Move changes from OPENOFFICE_ORG_1_1 branch, tag openoffice_org-1_0_99-1_1rc-1
to HEAD now that the packages are the current 'openoffice.org'
Files:
changed:.cvsignore MANIFEST.i386 MANIFE
Repository: oo-deb/debian/local
who:haggai
time: Mon Aug 11 11:31:31 UTC 2003
Log Message:
Move changes from OPENOFFICE_ORG_1_1 branch, tag openoffice_org-1_0_99-1_1rc-1
to HEAD now that the packages are the current 'openoffice.org'
Files:
changed:openoffice-dpack-lang ope
Le lun 11/08/2003 à 13:02, Chris Halls a écrit :
> Hi Jerome,
>
> Michael talked to me last week about his idea to use the same common
> patchset and packaging scripts. His suggestion is for us to use the same
> patch directory, with a mechanism to select which of the packages are
> actually appl
Hi Jerome,
Michael talked to me last week about his idea to use the same common
patchset and packaging scripts. His suggestion is for us to use the same
patch directory, with a mechanism to select which of the packages are
actually applied.
On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 12:27:57PM +0200, Jérôme Warnie
On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 11:17:08PM +0100, Peter Karlsson wrote:
> When opening a Word document (I think it's a Word 6 document, possibly Word
> 2, I can provide it upon request) in Writer, the "typographical" double
> quote marks are turned into question marks. The original document is written
> us
> Are you sure that the font that you are using has those quotes? You
> might like to try installing msttcorefonts if the document uses one
> of the standard MS fonts.
I have msttcorefonts installed, and the document is set to use Arial,
which does indeed have these characters. I can see them in
26 matches
Mail list logo
