Your message dated Sat, 04 Jan 2020 09:24:35 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#947909: fixed in libreoffice 1:6.4.0~rc1-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #947909,
regarding ure is trying to overwrite '/usr/share/java/juh.jar', which is also
in package libjuh-java 1:6.4.0~rc1-5
to be mar
Your message dated Sat, 04 Jan 2020 09:24:35 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#947909: fixed in libreoffice 1:6.4.0~rc1-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #947909,
regarding trying to overwrite '/usr/share/java/juh.jar', which is also in
package libjuh-java
to be marked as done.
This me
Your message dated Sat, 04 Jan 2020 09:24:35 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#947909: fixed in libreoffice 1:6.4.0~rc1-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #947909,
regarding ure uninstallable because of file conflict with libjuh-java
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that t
libreoffice_6.4.0~rc1-6_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
libreoffice_6.4.0~rc1-6.dsc
libreoffice_6.4.0~rc1-6.debian.tar.xz
libreoffice_6.4.0~rc1-6_source.buildinfo
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)
Source: libreoffice
Severity: normal
User: debian-powe...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ppc64
Hi!
The build on ppc64 currently fails because debian/rules tries to execute some
script code on ppc64 which is relevant for the OOO_NOGUI_ARCHS in debian/rules.
Specifically, the build fails with:
# remo
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2020 19:34:21 +0100
Source: libreoffice
Architecture: source
Version: 1:6.4.0~rc1-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian LibreOffice Maintainers
Changed-By: Rene Engelhard
Closes: 947
On Sat, Jan 04, 2020 at 10:19:13AM +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> The build on ppc64 currently fails because debian/rules tries to execute some
> script code on ppc64 which is relevant for the OOO_NOGUI_ARCHS in
> debian/rules.
Yes.
> # remove lib*uilo.so in --nogui
> find debian/libr
On 1/4/20 10:19 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> I haven't verified it, but my suspicion is that the following conditional
> test is
> incorrect as the function findstring will match "ppc64" in OOO_NOGUI_ARCHS if
> it contains "ppc64el":
>
> ifeq "$(ENABLE_GUI)" "y"
> ifneq (,$(findstring
Hi,
On Sat, Jan 04, 2020 at 02:07:36PM +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> On 1/4/20 10:19 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> > I haven't verified it, but my suspicion is that the following conditional
> > test is
> > incorrect as the function findstring will match "ppc64" in OOO_NOGUI_
On 1/4/20 2:28 PM, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> That just means that BUILD_NOGUI_PACKAGES=n is set and the nogui part is not
> even tried.
> ppc64 is fast and has server uses, so should definitel get -nogui.
That might be the case. But ppc64 is currently *not* in the list
of OOO_NOGUI_ARCH. Yet your r
Hi,
On Sat, Jan 04, 2020 at 02:33:51PM +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> On 1/4/20 2:28 PM, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > That just means that BUILD_NOGUI_PACKAGES=n is set and the nogui part is
> > not even tried.
> > ppc64 is fast and has server uses, so should definitel get -nogui.
>
> Th
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #948120 [src:libreoffice] libreoffice: Incorrect conditional test to enable
BUILD_NOGUI_PACKAGES
Added tag(s) pending.
--
948120: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=948120
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org w
On 1/4/20 2:57 PM, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Yes, because BUILD_NOGUI_PACKAGES=y is set because of findstring vs. filter.
>
> There you *are* right, I didn't say anything else.
This bug report was just about this particular issue
of using the wrong keyword.
>> What? I'm not sure why this would be
On Sat, Jan 04, 2020 at 03:15:02PM +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> Feel free to do the same for powerpc as the build machine
> for ppc64 and powerpc is the same and the new one for
> both architectures will be even faster.
No, powerpc in 32bits is dead.
And I even enabled i386 there onl
On 1/4/20 3:25 PM, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 04, 2020 at 03:15:02PM +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
>> Feel free to do the same for powerpc as the build machine
>> for ppc64 and powerpc is the same and the new one for
>> both architectures will be even faster.
>
> No, powerpc in
15 matches
Mail list logo
