Hi,
Am 19.06.20 um 19:19 schrieb John Paul Adrian Glaubitz:
> On 6/19/20 7:12 PM, Rene Engelhard wrote:
>> Sorry, I don't believe I don't need to fix stuff here myself. ia64 and
>> m68k even didn't yet do a ICU rebuild or at least make stuff being
>> rebuildable.
>>
>>> Would it be okay if I send
On 6/19/20 7:12 PM, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Sorry, I don't believe I don't need to fix stuff here myself. ia64 and
> m68k even didn't yet do a ICU rebuild or at least make stuff being
> rebuildable.
>
>> Would it be okay if I send a pull request to make the necessary changes?
>
> I am perfectly
Am 19.06.20 um 17:46 schrieb John Paul Adrian Glaubitz:
> On 6/19/20 1:08 PM, r...@rene-engelhard.de wrote:
>> Am 19. Juni 2020 12:52:40 MESZ schrieb John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
>> :
>>> So nothing that keeps us from using GCC in cases where clang is not
>>> available.
>>
>> Correct. Except
On 6/19/20 1:08 PM, r...@rene-engelhard.de wrote:
> Am 19. Juni 2020 12:52:40 MESZ schrieb John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
> :
>> So nothing that keeps us from using GCC in cases where clang is not
>> available.
>
> Correct. Except staying as close as possible with upstream.
While at the same time,
Am 19. Juni 2020 12:52:40 MESZ schrieb John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
:
>So nothing that keeps us from using GCC in cases where clang is not
>available.
Correct. Except staying as close as possible with upstream.
>>> Not sure why you want to enforce architectures off libreoffice when
>>> it’s
On 6/19/20 10:08 AM, r...@rene-engelhard.de wrote:
> Am 19. Juni 2020 09:58:34 MESZ schrieb John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
> :
>
>> clang isn’t required to build libreoffice [1], it’s just recommend.
>
> I know. That is even documented:
>
>
Am 19. Juni 2020 09:58:34 MESZ schrieb John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
:
>
>Not sure why you want to enforce architectures off libreoffice when
>it’s technically not necessary.
And besides what I said earlier those architectures are already forcing them
off *themselves*.
alpha:
Hi,
Am 19. Juni 2020 09:58:34 MESZ schrieb John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
:
>clang isn’t required to build libreoffice [1], it’s just recommend.
I know. That is even documented:
https://salsa.debian.org/libreoffice-team/libreoffice/libreoffice/-/blob/debian-experimental-7.0/rules
Line 617ff.
> On Jun 19, 2020, at 9:53 AM, r...@rene-engelhard.de wrote:
>
> severity 963109 wishlist
> tag 963109 + wontfix
> thanks
>
> Am 19. Juni 2020 08:24:57 MESZ schrieb John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
> :
>> I just noticed that src:libreoffice 7.x has added a build dependency on
>> clang
>> for alpha
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 963109 wishlist
Bug #963109 [src:libreoffice] libreoffice: Please drop clang from
build-dependencies for alpha and ia64
Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'normal'
> tag 963109 + wontfix
Bug #963109 [src:libreoffice] libreoffice: Please
severity 963109 wishlist
tag 963109 + wontfix
thanks
Am 19. Juni 2020 08:24:57 MESZ schrieb John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
:
>I just noticed that src:libreoffice 7.x has added a build dependency on
>clang
>for alpha and ia64. However, clang is unfortunately no longer available
>on
>these targets
Source: libreoffice
Version: 1:7.0.0~beta2-1
Severity: normal
User: debian-al...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: alpha ia64
Hello!
I just noticed that src:libreoffice 7.x has added a build dependency on clang
for alpha and ia64. However, clang is unfortunately no longer available on
these targets
12 matches
Mail list logo
